Literature DB >> 12615724

Hormone dependence in premalignant mammary progression.

Daniel Medina1, Frances S Kittrell, Anne Shepard, Alejandro Contreras, Jeffrey M Rosen, John Lydon.   

Abstract

Human breast cancers that are estrogen receptor (ER) negative convey a poor prognosis for patient survival. A mouse model that mimics essential biological and genetic attributes of a subset of human breast cancer is the BALB/c p53-null mammary epithelium, in which deletion of the tumor suppressor gene p53 results in enhanced tumorigenic risk. The experiments reported herein examine the hormone dependence of premalignant mammary progression in this model. The p53-null normal mammary epithelium exhibits the same dependence as p53 wild-type mammary epithelium on ovarian hormones for growth. However, in contrast to p53 wild-type epithelium, estrogen and progesterone, singly or in combination, strongly enhance tumorigenesis in p53-null mammary epithelium. The removal of progesterone signaling by deletion of the progesterone receptor eliminates progesterone enhancement of tumorigenesis. The immortalized premalignant outgrowth lines, termed PN, possess different tumorigenic capabilities, but the majority of these lines showed a strong dependence on ovarian hormones for growth and tumorigenesis. Although these lines are highly ER positive, a large number of tumors arising from these lines were ER negative and grew when implanted in ovariectomized mice. As was the case for p53-null normal mammary cells, hormonal stimulation was a strong promoter for tumorigenesis in the premalignant outgrowth lines and, surprisingly, was much stronger than the chemical carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene. In summary, these results demonstrate that p53-null mammary cells, which generate a significant percentage of ER-negative tumors, are highly responsive to the absence or presence of ovarian hormones during the normal and premalignant stages. This model would appear an excellent one to test the effects of chemopreventive agents on the development of both ER-negative and ER-positive mammary tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12615724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  36 in total

1.  Abrogation of p53 function leads to metastatic transcriptome networks that typify tumor progression in human breast cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Antonino B D'Assoro; Alexey Leontovich; Angela Amato; Jennifer R Ayers-Ringler; Cosima Quatraro; Kari Hafner; Robert B Jenkins; Massimo Libra; James Ingle; Franca Stivala; Evanthia Galanis; Jeffrey L Salisbury
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.650

2.  Finally! A model for progesterone receptor action in normal human breast.

Authors:  John P Lydon; Dean P Edwards
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  The chemopreventive effect of mifepristone on mammary tumorigenesis is associated with an anti-invasive and anti-inflammatory gene signature.

Authors:  Hongyan Yuan; Geeta Upadhyay; Jin Lu; Levy Kopelovich; Robert I Glazer
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2012-03-16

Review 4.  Genetically engineered ERα-positive breast cancer mouse models.

Authors:  Sarah A Dabydeen; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 5.678

5.  Radiation acts on the microenvironment to affect breast carcinogenesis by distinct mechanisms that decrease cancer latency and affect tumor type.

Authors:  David H Nguyen; Hellen A Oketch-Rabah; Irineu Illa-Bochaca; Felipe C Geyer; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Jian-Hua Mao; Shraddha A Ravani; Jiri Zavadil; Alexander D Borowsky; D Joseph Jerry; Karen A Dunphy; Jae Hong Seo; Sandra Haslam; Daniel Medina; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  Focus on the glycerophosphocholine pathway in choline phospholipid metabolism of cancer.

Authors:  Kanchan Sonkar; Vinay Ayyappan; Caitlin M Tressler; Oluwatobi Adelaja; Ruoqing Cai; Menglin Cheng; Kristine Glunde
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Prolactin-growth factor crosstalk reduces mammary estrogen responsiveness despite elevated ERalpha expression.

Authors:  Lisa M Arendt; Tara L Grafwallner-Huseth; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Targeting Obesity-Induced Macrophages during Preneoplastic Growth Promotes Mammary Epithelial Stem/Progenitor Activity, DNA Damage, and Tumor Formation.

Authors:  Tamara Chamberlin; Megan Clack; Caylee Silvers; Genevra Kuziel; Victoria Thompson; Haley Johnson; Lisa M Arendt
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Scaffold Attachment Factor B1 (SAFB1) heterozygosity does not influence Wnt-1 or DMBA-induced tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Benny Abraham Kaipparettu; Klaudia M Dobrzycka; Ora Britton; Adrian V Lee; Alan J Herron; Yi Li; Michael T Lewis; Daniel Medina; Steffi Oesterreich
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Progesterone receptor A-regulated gene expression in mammary organoid cultures.

Authors:  Sarah J Santos; Mark D Aupperlee; Jianwei Xie; Srinivasan Durairaj; Richard Miksicek; Susan E Conrad; Jeffrey R Leipprandt; Ying S Tan; Richard C Schwartz; Sandra Z Haslam
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 4.292

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.