Literature DB >> 24481326

Genetically engineered ERα-positive breast cancer mouse models.

Sarah A Dabydeen1, Priscilla A Furth.   

Abstract

The majority of human breast cancers are estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), but this has proven challenging to model in genetically engineered mice. This review summarizes information on 21 mouse models that develop ER+ mammary cancer. Where available, information on cancer pathology and gene expression profiles is referenced to assist in understanding which histological subtype of ER+ human cancer each model might represent. ESR1, CCDN1, prolactin, TGFα, AIB1, ESPL1, and WNT1 overexpression, PIK3CA gain of function, as well as loss of P53 (Trp53) or STAT1 are associated with ER+ mammary cancer. Treatment with the PPARγ agonist efatutazone in a mouse with Brca1 and p53 deficiency and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene exposure in combination with an activated myristoylated form of AKT1 also induce ER+ mammary cancer. A spontaneous mutant in nude mice that develops metastatic ER+ mammary cancer is included. Age of cancer development ranges from 3 to 26 months and the percentage of cancers that are ER+ vary from 21 to 100%. Not all models are characterized as to their estrogen dependency and/or response to anti-hormonal therapy. Strain backgrounds include C57Bl/6, FVB, BALB/c, 129S6/SvEv, CB6F1, and NIH nude. Most models have only been studied on one strain background. In summary, while a range of models are available for studies of pathogenesis and therapy of ER+ breast cancers, many could benefit from further characterization, and opportunity for development of new models remains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast; carcinoma; estrogen receptor; mammary gland; pathogenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481326      PMCID: PMC4013173          DOI: 10.1530/ERC-13-0512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer        ISSN: 1351-0088            Impact factor:   5.678


  103 in total

Review 1.  Estrogen responsiveness and control of normal human breast proliferation.

Authors:  E Anderson; R B Clarke; A Howell
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  The development, application and limitations of breast cancer cell lines to study tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor resistance.

Authors:  Cynthie Wong; Shiuan Chen
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 3.  Killing the second messenger: targeting loss of cell cycle control in endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol A Lange; Douglas Yee
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 4.  Transgenic mouse models of hormonal mammary carcinogenesis: advantages and limitations.

Authors:  Nameer B Kirma; Rajeshwar R Tekmal
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  The role of prolactin in mammary carcinoma.

Authors:  Charles V Clevenger; Priscilla A Furth; Susan E Hankinson; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  Selective binding of steroid hormone receptors to octamer transcription factors determines transcriptional synergism at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter.

Authors:  G G Préfontaine; R Walther; W Giffin; M E Lemieux; L Pope; R J Haché
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Minireview: Cyclin D1: normal and abnormal functions.

Authors:  Maofu Fu; Chenguang Wang; Zhiping Li; Toshiyuki Sakamaki; Richard G Pestell
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.736

9.  Dysregulated STAT1-SOCS1 control of JAK2 promotes mammary luminal progenitor cell survival and drives ERα(+) tumorigenesis.

Authors:  S R Chan; C G Rickert; W Vermi; K C F Sheehan; C Arthur; J A Allen; J M White; J Archambault; S Lonardi; T M McDevitt; D Bhattacharya; M V Lorenzi; D C Allred; R D Schreiber
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 15.828

10.  Association of Over-Expressed Estrogen Receptor Alpha with Development of Tamoxifen Resistant Hyperplasia and Adenocarcinomas in Genetically Engineered Mice.

Authors:  Anne M Miermont; Marina Carla Cabrera; Silvina M Frech; Rebecca E Nakles; Edgar S Diaz-Cruz; Maddalena Tilli Shiffert; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Anat Physiol       Date:  2012-06-25
View more
  18 in total

1.  Homology models of mouse and rat estrogen receptor-α ligand-binding domain created by in silico mutagenesis of a human template: molecular docking with 17ß-estradiol, diethylstilbestrol, and paraben analogs.

Authors:  Thomas L Gonzalez; James M Rae; Justin A Colacino; Rudy J Richardson
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-28

Review 2.  Effects of isoflavones on breast tissue and the thyroid hormone system in humans: a comprehensive safety evaluation.

Authors:  S Hüser; S Guth; H G Joost; S T Soukup; J Köhrle; L Kreienbrock; P Diel; D W Lachenmeier; G Eisenbrand; G Vollmer; U Nöthlings; D Marko; A Mally; T Grune; L Lehmann; P Steinberg; S E Kulling
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Intraductal Injection of Lentivirus Vectors for Stably Introducing Genes into Rat Mammary Epithelial Cells in Vivo.

Authors:  Wen Bu; Yi Li
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Antiestrogen Therapy Increases Plasticity and Cancer Stemness of Prolactin-Induced ERα+ Mammary Carcinomas.

Authors:  Michael P Shea; Kathleen A O'Leary; Saja A Fakhraldeen; Vincent Goffin; Andreas Friedl; Kari B Wisinski; Caroline M Alexander; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Exogenous ERα Expression in the Mammary Epithelium Decreases Over Time and Does Not Contribute to p53-Deficient Mammary Tumor Formation in Mice.

Authors:  Lisette M Cornelissen; Linda Henneman; Anne Paulien Drenth; Eva Schut; Roebi de Bruijn; Sjoerd Klarenbeek; Wilbert Zwart; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 2.673

6.  SRC Increases MYC mRNA Expression in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer via mRNA Stabilization and Inhibition of p53 Function.

Authors:  Christopher Abdullah; Hasan Korkaya; Shinji Iizuka; Sara A Courtneidge
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Conditional expression of Ki-RasG12V in the mammary epithelium of transgenic mice induces estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  S Andò; R Malivindi; S Catalano; P Rizza; I Barone; S Panza; D Rovito; C Emprou; J-M Bornert; G Laverny; D Metzger
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  GATA3 Truncating Mutations Promote Cistromic Re-Programming In Vitro, but Not Mammary Tumor Formation in Mice.

Authors:  Lisette M Cornelissen; Roebi de Bruijn; Linda Henneman; Yongsoo Kim; Wilbert Zwart; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Modeling prolactin actions in breast cancer in vivo: insights from the NRL-PRL mouse.

Authors:  Kathleen A O'Leary; Michael P Shea; Linda A Schuler
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Mouse Models of Overexpression Reveal Distinct Oncogenic Roles for Different Type I Protein Arginine Methyltransferases.

Authors:  Jianqiang Bao; Alessandra Di Lorenzo; Kevin Lin; Yue Lu; Yi Zhong; Manu M Sebastian; William J Muller; Yanzhong Yang; Mark T Bedford
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.