Literature DB >> 12424273

Encoding of sound localization cues by an identified auditory interneuron: effects of stimulus temporal pattern.

Annie-Hélène Samson1, Gerald S Pollack.   

Abstract

An important cue for sound localization is binaural comparison of stimulus intensity. Two features of neuronal responses, response strength, i.e., spike count and/or rate, and response latency, vary with stimulus intensity, and binaural comparison of either or both might underlie localization. Previous studies at the receptor-neuron level showed that these response features are affected by the stimulus temporal pattern. When sounds are repeated rapidly, as occurs in many natural sounds, response strength decreases and latency increases, resulting in altered coding of localization cues. In this study we analyze binaural cues for sound localization at the level of an identified pair of interneurons (the left and right AN2) in the cricket auditory system, with emphasis on the effects of stimulus temporal pattern on binaural response differences. AN2 spike count decreases with rapidly repeated stimulation and latency increases. Both effects depend on stimulus intensity. Because of the difference in intensity at the two ears, binaural differences in spike count and latency change as stimulation continues. The binaural difference in spike count decreases, whereas the difference in latency increases. The proportional changes in response strength and in latency are greater at the interneuron level than at the receptor level, suggesting that factors in addition to decrement of receptor responses are involved. Intracellular recordings reveal that a slowly building, long-lasting hyperpolarization is established in AN2. At the same time, the level of depolarization reached during the excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) resulting from each sound stimulus decreases. Neither these effects on membrane potential nor the changes in spiking response are accounted for by contralateral inhibition. Based on comparison of our results with earlier behavioral experiments, it is unlikely that crickets use the binaural difference in latency of AN2 responses as the main cue for determining sound direction, leaving the difference in response strength, i.e., spike count and/or rate, as the most likely candidate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12424273     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00119.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Sensory cues for sound localization in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus: interaural difference in response strength versus interaural latency difference.

Authors:  G S Pollack
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear.

Authors:  Matthew E Jackson; Navdeep S Asi; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 3.  Corollary discharge inhibition and audition in the stridulating cricket.

Authors:  J F A Poulet
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Effect of the temporal pattern of contralateral inhibition on sound localization cues.

Authors:  Gary Marsat; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A behavioral role for feature detection by sensory bursts.

Authors:  Gary Marsat; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Phonotactic steering and representation of directional information in the ascending auditory pathway of a cricket.

Authors:  M Lv; X Zhang; B Hedwig
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Cassandra Guignion
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Temporal and directional processing by an identified interneuron, ON1, compared in cricket species that sing with different tempos.

Authors:  D Nicole Tunstall; Gerald S Pollack
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Spatial orientation in the bushcricket Leptophyes punctatissima (Phaneropterinae; Orthoptera): III. Peripheral directionality and central nervous processing of spatial cues.

Authors:  Konstantinos Kostarakos; Jürgen Rheinlaender; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Adaptation and selective information transmission in the cricket auditory neuron AN2.

Authors:  Klaus Wimmer; K Jannis Hildebrandt; R Matthias Hennig; Klaus Obermayer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.