Literature DB >> 12605973

Improved conformality and decreased toxicity with intraoperative computer-optimized transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy.

Michael J Zelefsky1, Yoshiya Yamada, Christine Marion, Sang Sim, Gilad Cohen, Leah Ben-Porat, David Silvern, Marco Zaider.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have developed an intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment planning system for permanent prostate implantation in an effort to reduce toxicity further and improve the accuracy of this procedure. We report the preliminary outcome of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with this approach. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred forty-eight patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with transperineal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate implantation using a real-time intraoperative 3D conformal technique (I-3D) between 1997 and 2001. A genetic algorithm optimization program intraoperatively evaluated the dose deposited throughout the entire 3D volume for multiple seed configurations to identify which seed-loading pattern adhered best to the predetermined target, urethral and rectal dose constraints. The median follow-up time in these patients was 27 months (range 12-51). The dosimetric outcome and acute toxicity profile of these 248 patients were compared with those of patients who were treated between 1988 and 1996 at our institution with a preplanned transperineal implantation technique (PP).
RESULTS: Postimplantation dosimetric analysis of the I-3D group demonstrated that the median value of the percentage of the target volume treated to at least the prescription dose (V(100)) was 96%, and the target coverage with the prescription dose (PD) was </=90% in only 3% of these patients. In contrast, among patients treated with the PP method, the median V(100) was 88% and the target coverage with the PD was </=90% in 60% of these patients (p < 0.001). For the I-3D patients, the median and maximal dose to the urethra was 140% and 170% of the PD, respectively, compared with 263% and 532%, respectively, for patients treated with the PP technique. The percentage of urinary symptom resolution at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months for the I-3D cohort was 39%, 72%, 90%, and 97%, respectively. In contrast, the percentage of symptom resolution at the same intervals for patients treated with the PP technique was 12%, 20%, 31%, and 42% (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the I-3D technique was an independent predictor of improved target coverage, reduced urethral dose, and more rapid resolution of urinary-related symptoms. The improved dosimetric conformity with the I-3D technique did not compromise the biochemical outcome, as the 4-year actuarial prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival rate for this group was 97%.
CONCLUSION: The integration of an intraoperative optimization program with 3D dose evaluation throughout the target volume for prostate brachytherapy has consistently achieved excellent target coverage with the PD, and the dose levels to normal tissues were effectively restricted to tolerance ranges. These changes have led to a more favorable acute toxicity profile for patients treated with this technique without compromising biochemical control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12605973     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04142-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  20 in total

1.  Robotic needle guide for prostate brachytherapy: clinical testing of feasibility and performance.

Authors:  Danny Y Song; Everette C Burdette; Jonathan Fiene; Elwood Armour; Gernot Kronreif; Anton Deguet; Zhe Zhang; Iulian Iordachita; Gabor Fichtinger; Peter Kazanzides
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Comparison of urethral diameters for calculating the urethral dose after permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Osamu Tanaka; Shinya Hayashi; Masayuki Matsuo; Masahiro Nakano; Yasuaki Kubota; Sunaho Maeda; Kazuhiro Ohtakara; Takashi Deguchi; Hiroaki Hoshi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-08-27

3.  Robotic assistance for ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Gabor Fichtinger; Jonathan P Fiene; Christopher W Kennedy; Gernot Kronreif; Iulian Iordachita; Danny Y Song; Everette C Burdette; Peter Kazanzides
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Real-time intraoperative computed tomography assessment of quality of permanent interstitial seed implantation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Mick Worman; Gilad N Cohen; Xin Pei; Marisa Kollmeier; Josh Yamada; Brett Cox; Zhigang Zhang; Eva Bieniek; Lawrence Dauer; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Advantage of robotic needle placement on a prostate model in HDR brachytherapy.

Authors:  Gerd Strassmann; Peter Olbert; Axel Hegele; Detlev Richter; Emmanouil Fokas; Nina Timmesfeld; Rainer Hofmann; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Z Jay Chen; Jun Deng; Kenneth Roberts; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Regarding the focal treatment of prostate cancer: inference of the Gleason grade from magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Ryan S Brame; Marco Zaider; Kristen L Zakian; Jason A Koutcher; Amita Shukla-Dave; Victor E Reuter; Michael J Zelefsky; Peter T Scardino; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  MR imaging-guided interventions in the genitourinary tract: an evolving concept.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Kemal Tuncali; Paul R Morrison; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.266

9.  Radiation safety of receptive anal intercourse with prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Nicola J Nasser; Gil'ad N Cohen; Lawrence T Dauer; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Does radical treatment have a role in the management of low-risk prostate cancer? The place for brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Scott G Williams; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.