Literature DB >> 12602524

Bioartificial liver support anno 2001.

Robert A F M Chamuleau1.   

Abstract

Despite maximal intensive care, mortality of acute fulminant hepatic failure is high: 60%-75% in several studies. In addition patients with chronic liver insufficiency suffer from a bad quality of life: all patients suffer from fatigue; symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy, jaundice, and itching are often present. Analogous to artificial kidney treatment in patients with renal failure, an artificial liver assist device is needed not only to bridge patients with fulminant hepatic failure to liver transplantation or own liver regeneration, but also to improve the quality of life of patients with chronic liver insufficiency. Several modalities of artificial liver support are under investigation, like plasma exchange, haemodialysis, haemadsorption, albumin dialysis, liver cell transplantation, and the bioartificial liver. Artificial livers based on only supportive detoxification function do not show significant improvement of survival in controlled studies. Bioartificial liver support systems have also the potential to support hepatic synthetic functions. Bioreactors can be charged with freshly isolated or cryopreserved porcine hepatocytes, but also by human hepatoma cell lines. Several uncontrolled studies in humans show safety of such a treatment, even by using porcine cells. Transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus to recipients has not been found. Furthermore, beneficial effects have been reported on symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy, on the height of intracranial pressure and on hemodynamic parameters. By using porcine cells immunological problems (e.g., serum sickness) can be expected during treatments longer than one week. However, "proof of the pudding" in the sense of improvement of survival is not yet available. The creation of a "liver dialysis unit" in the near future depends mainly on the development of well-differentiated immortalized human hepatocytes. Some progress in this field has already been obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12602524     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021990725508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metab Brain Dis        ISSN: 0885-7490            Impact factor:   3.584


  34 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy.

Authors:  R A Chamuleau
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Pilot-controlled trial of the extracorporeal liver assist device in acute liver failure.

Authors:  A J Ellis; R D Hughes; J A Wendon; J Dunne; P G Langley; J H Kelly; G T Gislason; N L Sussman; R Williams
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Assessment of the AMC-bioartificial liver in the anhepatic pig.

Authors:  Meindert N Sosef; Leo S L Abrahamse; Maarten-Paul van de Kerkhove; Robin Hartman; Rob A F M Chamuleau; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2002-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Clinical experience with a bioartificial liver in the treatment of severe liver failure. A phase I clinical trial.

Authors:  F D Watanabe; C J Mullon; W R Hewitt; N Arkadopoulos; E Kahaku; S Eguchi; T Khalili; W Arnaout; C R Shackleton; J Rozga; B Solomon; A A Demetriou
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Safety observations in phase I clinical evaluation of the Excorp Medical Bioartificial Liver Support System after the first four patients.

Authors:  G V Mazariegos; D J Kramer; R C Lopez; A O Shakil; A J Rosenbloom; M DeVera; M Giraldo; T A Grogan; Y Zhu; M L Fulmer; B P Amiot; J F Patzer
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.872

6.  Prevention of acute liver failure in rats with reversibly immortalized human hepatocytes.

Authors:  N Kobayashi; T Fujiwara; K A Westerman; Y Inoue; M Sakaguchi; H Noguchi; M Miyazaki; J Cai; N Tanaka; I J Fox; P Leboulch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Evaluation of a novel bioartificial liver in rats with complete liver ischemia: treatment efficacy and species-specific alpha-GST detection to monitor hepatocyte viability.

Authors:  L M Flendrig; R A Chamuleau; M A Maas; J Daalhuisen; B Hasset; C G Kilty; S Doyle; N C Ladiges; G G Jörning; J W la Soe; D Sommeijer; A A te Velde
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  Controlled trials of charcoal hemoperfusion and prognostic factors in fulminant hepatic failure.

Authors:  J G O'Grady; A E Gimson; C J O'Brien; A Pucknell; R D Hughes; R Williams
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  In vivo evaluation of a hollow fiber liver assist device.

Authors:  H O Jauregui; C J Mullon; D Trenkler; S Naik; H Santangini; P Press; T E Muller; B A Solomon
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  A hybrid bioartificial liver composed of multiplated hepatocyte monolayers.

Authors:  J Uchino; T Tsuburaya; F Kumagai; T Hase; T Hamada; T Komai; A Funatsu; E Hashimura; K Nakamura; T Kon
Journal:  ASAIO Trans       Date:  1988 Oct-Dec
View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of hemoperfusion adsorption and/or plasma exchange in treatment of severe viral hepatitis: a comparative study.

Authors:  Nian-Hai He; Ying-Jie Wang; Ze-Wen Wang; Jun Liu; Jia-Jia Li; Guo-Dong Liu; Yu-Ming Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Cellular Transplantation for Liver Diseases.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jameson
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2008-11-20

3.  Modified model for end-stage liver disease improves short-term prognosis of hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Jia You; Jing Chen; Qi Zheng; Jia-Ji Jiang; Yue-Yong Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.