Literature DB >> 11575820

Safety observations in phase I clinical evaluation of the Excorp Medical Bioartificial Liver Support System after the first four patients.

G V Mazariegos1, D J Kramer, R C Lopez, A O Shakil, A J Rosenbloom, M DeVera, M Giraldo, T A Grogan, Y Zhu, M L Fulmer, B P Amiot, J F Patzer.   

Abstract

A Phase I clinical safety evaluation of the Excorp Medical, Inc, Bioartificial Liver Support System (BLSS) is in progress. Inclusion criteria are patients with acute liver failure of any etiology, presenting with encephalopathy deteriorating beyond Parson's Grade 2. The BLSS consists of a blood pump, heat exchanger to control blood temperature, oxygenator to control oxygenation and pH, bioreactor, and associated pressure and flow alarm systems. Patient liver support is provided by 70-100 g of porcine liver cells housed in the hollow fiber bioreactor. A single support period evaluation consists of 12 hour extracorporeal perfusion with the BLSS sandwiched between 12 hours of pre (baseline) and 12 hours of post support monitoring. Blood chemistries and hematologies are obtained every 6 hours during monitoring periods and every 4 hours during perfusion. Physiologic parameters are monitored continuously. The patient may receive a second treatment at the discretion of the clinical physician. Preliminary evaluation of safety considerations after enrollment of the first four patients (F, 41, acetaminophen induced, two support periods; M, 50, Wilson's disease, one support period; F, 53, acute alcoholic hepatitis, two support periods; F, 24, chemotherapy induced, one support period) is presented. All patients tolerated the extracorporeal perfusion well. All patients presented with hypoglycemia at the start of perfusion, treatable by IV dextrose. Transient hypotension at the start of perfusion responded to an IV fluid bolus. Only the second patient required heparin anticoagulation. No serious or unexpected adverse events were noted. Moderate biochemical response to support was noted in all patients. Completion of the Phase I safety evaluation is required to fully characterize the safety of the BLSS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11575820     DOI: 10.1097/00002480-200109000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  14 in total

1.  Fluidized-bed bioartificial liver assist devices (BLADs) based on microencapsulated primary porcine hepatocytes have risk of porcine endogenous retroviruses transmission.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Fei Liu; Xiao Ping Pan; Guoliang Lv; Anye Zhang; Chen Bo Yu; Lanjuan Li
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  Cell therapeutic options in liver diseases: cell types, medical devices and regulatory issues.

Authors:  Andreas K Nussler; Katrin Zeilinger; Lilianna Schyschka; Sabrina Ehnert; Jörg C Gerlach; Xueying Yan; Serene M L Lee; Maren Ilowski; Wolfgang E Thasler; Thomas S Weiss
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Changes in peripheral CD4+CD25(high) regulatory T cells in the acute-on-chronic liver failure patients with plasma exchange treatment.

Authors:  Wei-lin Mao; Yu-Feng Lou; Bo Ye; Sha Lin; Yue-mei Chen; Yu Chen
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.092

4.  A bioartificial liver device secreting interleukin-1 receptor antagonist for the treatment of hepatic failure in rats.

Authors:  Masahiro Shinoda; Arno W Tilles; Naoya Kobayashi; Go Wakabayashi; Atsushi Takayanagi; Toshinori Totsugawa; Hirohisa Harada; Hideaki Obara; Kazuhiro Suganuma; François Berthiaume; Motohide Shimazu; Nobuyoshi Shimizu; Noriaki Tanaka; Masaki Kitajima; Ronald G Tompkins; Mehmet Toner; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 5.  Bioartificial liver support anno 2001.

Authors:  Robert A F M Chamuleau
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.584

Review 6.  Clinical application of bioartificial liver support systems.

Authors:  Maarten Paul van de Kerkhove; Ruurdtje Hoekstra; Robert A F M Chamuleau; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Long-term superior performance of a stem cell/hepatocyte device for the treatment of acute liver failure.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yagi; Biju Parekkadan; Kazuhiro Suganuma; Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez; Ronald G Tompkins; Arno W Tilles; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to hepatocyte-like cells on a new developed xeno-free extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Zahra Farzaneh; Mohammad Pakzad; Massoud Vosough; Behshad Pournasr; Hossein Baharvand
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.304

9.  Present and Future Developments in Hepatic Tissue Engineering for Liver Support Systems : State of the art and future developments of hepatic cell culture techniques for the use in liver support systems.

Authors:  Sonja Diekmann; Augustinus Bader; Stephanie Schmitmeier
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 2.058

10.  Similarities in the immunoglobulin response and VH gene usage in rhesus monkeys and humans exposed to porcine hepatocytes.

Authors:  Joanne L Zahorsky-Reeves; Clare R Gregory; Donald V Cramer; Insiyyah Y Patanwala; Andrew E Kyles; Dominic C Borie; Mary K Kearns-Jonker
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.