Literature DB >> 3280388

Controlled trials of charcoal hemoperfusion and prognostic factors in fulminant hepatic failure.

J G O'Grady1, A E Gimson, C J O'Brien, A Pucknell, R D Hughes, R Williams.   

Abstract

One hundred thirty-seven patients with fulminant hepatic failure were entered into two controlled trials of charcoal hemoperfusion carried out concurrently. In trial A, 75 patients with grade 3 encephalopathy were randomized to receive 5 or 10 h of hemoperfusion daily. Overall survival rates for the two groups were similar (51.3% vs. 50.0%) as was the frequency of major complications including cerebral edema and renal failure. In trial B, in which 62 patients with established grade 4 encephalopathy on admission were randomized to a no-perfusion group or to have 10 h of hemoperfusion daily, overall survival rates for the two groups were again similar (39.3% and 34.5%, respectively). There was in both trials a significant relationship between survival and etiology quite independent of the use or duration of hemoperfusion. Thus, percentage survival for the acetaminophen-overdose cases was 52.9%, for hepatitis A 66.7%, for hepatitis B 38.9%, for presumed non-A, non-B hepatitis 20%, and for halothane or drug reaction 12.5%. Within the etiologic subgroups survival was also influenced by the three major complications that developed, being inversely related to their frequency and combination, except in the non-A, non-B hepatitis and halothane or drug reaction subgroups, which had a high mortality throughout. In the latter cases particularly, orthotopic liver transplantation merits early consideration and in the group with better "intrinsic" survival (acetaminophen, hepatitis A and B) intensive management of complications (rather than charcoal hemoperfusion) would appear to be of major importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3280388     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90011-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  69 in total

Review 1.  Extracorporeal perfusion for the treatment of acute liver failure.

Authors:  H B Stockmann; C A Hiemstra; R L Marquet; J N IJzermans
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Cell therapies for liver diseases.

Authors:  Yue Yu; James E Fisher; Joseph B Lillegard; Brian Rodysill; Bruce Amiot; Scott L Nyberg
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 3.  [Liver replacement therapy. Reliable indications in acute liver failure].

Authors:  K Rifai; M Ott; M M Bahr; A Schneider; M P Manns
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Liver support in acute liver failure.

Authors:  Robin D Hughes
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 5.  Prospects for extracorporeal liver support.

Authors:  R Jalan; S Sen; R Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Artificial and bioartificial support systems for liver failure.

Authors:  J P Liu; L L Gluud; B Als-Nielsen; C Gluud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

Review 7.  Fulminant hepatic failure. Clinical features, etiology, epidemiology, and current management.

Authors:  L Capocaccia; M Angelico
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients treated with artificial liver support system.

Authors:  Pi-Qi Zhou; Shao-Ping Zheng; Min Yu; Sheng-Song He; Zhi-Hong Weng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Acute liver failure.

Authors:  J G O'Grady
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 10.  Hepatic disorders. Features and appropriate management.

Authors:  M A Aldersley; J G O'Grady
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.