Literature DB >> 12601559

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a pilot study of a new computer version of the self-report scale.

J Truman1, K Robinson, A L Evans, D Smith, L Cunningham, R Millward, H Minnis.   

Abstract

A computer-based version of the self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was developed with colourful graphics illustrating each question. One hundred and two children referred to child and adolescent mental health services were recruited and randomly allocated to complete either the new computer-based version or the paper original. A further 112 children from local schools were recruited and completed the computer-based version of the scale. All children who took part in the study were aged between 8 and 15 years. The paper version of the SDQ is recommended for use in children aged 11 and over and, in this age group, the computer-based questionnaire was able to discriminate between the clinical and community sample (ROC = 0.761, 95 % CI 0.676-0.846). Comparison of the paper-based SDQ and computer-based SDQ within the clinic sample found trends towards better test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability and significantly better user satisfaction in the computer version compared to the paper-based version. The computer-based SDQ has the added advantage of results being automatically added to a spreadsheet out of view from the user reducing the chance of operator error in coding and entering the data. These preliminary results suggest that the computer-based version of the SDQ may represent a further improvement on the paper SDQ. All versions of the SDQ, including the computer-based version, can be downloaded from the Strengths and Difficulties website address www.sdqinfo.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12601559     DOI: 10.1007/s00787-003-0303-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 1018-8827            Impact factor:   4.785


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of Clinical Diagnoses, NIMH-DISC-IV Diagnoses and SCL-90-R Ratings in an Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Unit: A Brief Report.

Authors:  Nasreen Roberts; Kevin C H Parker; Marla Dagnone
Journal:  Can Child Adolesc Psychiatr Rev       Date:  2005-11

2.  Comparison of web-based versus paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire: effects on health indicators in Dutch adolescents.

Authors:  Petra M Van De Looij-Jansen; Erik Jan De Wilde
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The Computerized MacArthur Story Stem Battery--a pilot study of a novel medium for assessing children's representations of relationships.

Authors:  Helen Minnis; Reuben Millward; Claire Sinclair; Eilis Kennedy; Anne Greig; Kate Towlson; Warren Read; Jonathan Hill
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 4.  Conceptual and methodological advances in child-reported outcomes measurement.

Authors:  Katherine B Bevans; Anne W Riley; JeanHee Moon; Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Acceptability and utility of an electronic psychosocial assessment (myAssessment) to increase self-disclosure in youth mental healthcare: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Sally Bradford; Debra Rickwood
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Young People's Views on Electronic Mental Health Assessment: Prefer to Type than Talk?

Authors:  Sally Bradford; Debra Rickwood
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2015

Review 7.  Psychosocial assessments for young people: a systematic review examining acceptability, disclosure and engagement, and predictive utility.

Authors:  Sally Bradford; Debra Rickwood
Journal:  Adolesc Health Med Ther       Date:  2012-12-21

8.  The use of routine outcome measures in two child and adolescent mental health services: a completed audit cycle.

Authors:  Charlotte L Hall; Maria Moldavsky; Laurence Baldwin; Michael Marriott; Karen Newell; John Taylor; Kapil Sayal; Chris Hollis
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services.

Authors:  Charlotte L Hall; John Taylor; Maria Moldavsky; Michael Marriott; Sarah Pass; Karen Newell; Robert Goodman; Kapil Sayal; Chris Hollis
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 10.  Measuring mental health and wellbeing outcomes for children and adolescents to inform practice and policy: a review of child self-report measures.

Authors:  Jessica Deighton; Tim Croudace; Peter Fonagy; Jeb Brown; Praveetha Patalay; Miranda Wolpert
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.