Literature DB >> 12601209

Coronary artery imaging with real-time navigator three-dimensional turbo-field-echo MR coronary angiography: initial experience.

Jan Bogaert1, Ronald Kuzo, Steven Dymarkowski, Roel Beckers, Jan Piessens, Frank E Rademakers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the value of a commercially available three-dimensional (3D) real-time navigator magnetic resonance (MR) coronary angiographic examination for detection of significant coronary artery stenoses, with conventional coronary angiography as the standard of reference.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent 3D navigator MR coronary angiography immediately before catheterization. Two observers independently graded image quality on a scale from 1 (unreadable) to 5 (excellent), quantified coronary artery visualization, and evaluated the presence of significant (ie, >50% narrowing) stenoses. kappa statistics were used to assess interobserver agreement, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess stenosis detection.
RESULTS: For two of 21 patients, MR coronary angiogram quality was insufficient for analysis (mean score < 2). For the remaining 19 patients, the mean image quality scores assigned by observers 1 and 2 were 3.3 +/- 1.0 (SD) and 3.2 +/- 0.9, respectively. A mean of 71% of all coronary artery segments were visible at MR coronary angiography, and there was 91% agreement between the observers (kappa = 0.78). Observers 1 and 2 detected significant stenoses (n = 29) at MR coronary angiography with sensitivities of 44.4% and 55.5%, respectively; specificities of 95.1% and 83.7%, respectively; and 80% agreement (kappa = 0.35). Areas under the ROC curve were 0.817 and 0.795 for observers 1 and 2, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Large portions of the coronary arteries can be visualized with MR coronary angiography. Imaging results are not consistently reliable, however. The examination is premature for routine clinical assessment of significant coronary artery stenosis owing to low sensitivity and large observer variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12601209     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2263011750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  19 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Left main coronary artery disease: A review of the spectrum of noninvasive diagnostic modalities.

Authors:  Nishtha Sareen; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  MRI versus CT for the detection of coronary artery disease: current state and future promises.

Authors:  Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Comparison between the image quality of multisegment and halfscan reconstructions of non-invasive CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  D Schnapauff; F Teige; B Hamm; M Dewey
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Contribution of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of coronary arteries.

Authors:  Sophie Mavrogeni; George Markousis-Mavrogenis; Genovefa Kolovou
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-26

7.  Visibility of the origin and proximal course of coronary arteries on non-ECG-gated heart CT in patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Goo; In-Sook Park; Jae Kon Ko; Young Hwee Kim; Dong-Man Seo; Tae-Jin Yun; Jeong-Jun Park
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2005-05-11

8.  Three-dimensional breathhold magnetization-prepared TrueFISP: a pilot study for magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Richard M McCarthy; Vibhas S Deshpande; Nirat Beohar; Sheridan N Meyers; Steven M Shea; Jordin D Green; Xin Liu; Xiaoming Bi; F Scott Pereles; John Paul Finn; Charles J Davidson; James C Carr; Debiao Li
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Functional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of myocardial viability and perfusion: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-11-01

Review 10.  Noninvasive imaging modalities to visualize atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Daisuke Shishikura
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.