Literature DB >> 27500092

Noninvasive imaging modalities to visualize atherosclerotic plaques.

Daisuke Shishikura1.   

Abstract

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is becoming a major cause of death in the world due to global epidemic of diabetes and obesity. For the prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, it is necessary to detect high-risk atherosclerotic plaques prior to events. Recent technological advances enable to visualize atherosclerotic plaques noninvasively. This ability of noninvasive imaging helps to refine cardiovascular risk assessment in various individuals, select optimal therapeutic strategy and evaluate the efficacy of medical therapies. In this review, we discuss the role of the currently available imaging modalities including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography. Advantages and disadvantages of each noninvasive imaging modality will be also summarized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Noninvasive imaging; atherosclerotic plaque; computed tomography (CT); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); positron emission tomography

Year:  2016        PMID: 27500092      PMCID: PMC4960065          DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2015.11.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  86 in total

1.  Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT.

Authors:  C R Becker; T Kleffel; A Crispin; A Knez; J Young; U J Schoepf; R Haberl; M F Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  MR imaging for the noninvasive assessment of atherothrombotic plaques.

Authors:  Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A S Agatston; W R Janowitz; F J Hildner; N R Zusmer; M Viamonte; R Detrano
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  In vivo imaging of mineral deposition in carotid plaque using 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT: correlation with atherogenic risk factors.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Christian Wisotzki; Ulrich Richter; Ivayla Apostolova; Peter Bannas; Christoph Weber; Janos Mester; Susanne Klutmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Reproducibility of carotid atherosclerotic lesion type characterization using high resolution multicontrast weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Baocheng Chu; Binh An P Phan; Niranjan Balu; Chun Yuan; B Greg Brown; Xue-Qiao Zhao
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Correlation of inflammation assessed by 18F-FDG PET, active mineral deposition assessed by 18F-fluoride PET, and vascular calcification in atherosclerotic plaque: a dual-tracer PET/CT study.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Zoltán Tóth; László Papp; Christian Wisotzki; Ivayla Apostolova; Christian R Habermann; Janos Mester; Susanne Klutmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Carotid artery atherosclerosis: in vivo morphologic characterization with gadolinium-enhanced double-oblique MR imaging initial results.

Authors:  Bruce A Wasserman; William I Smith; Hugh H Trout; Richard O Cannon; Robert S Balaban; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  FDG PET imaging and cardiovascular inflammation.

Authors:  Nadine Hiari; James H F Rudd
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  18F-FDG PET/CT identifies patients at risk for future vascular events in an otherwise asymptomatic cohort with neoplastic disease.

Authors:  Axel Rominger; Tobias Saam; Sarah Wolpers; Clemens C Cyran; Michael Schmidt; Stefan Foerster; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Peter Bartenstein; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Matthias Renker; U Joseph Schoepf; Rui Wang; Felix G Meinel; Jeremy D Rier; Richard R Bayer; Helge Möllmann; Christian W Hamm; Daniel H Steinberg; Stefan Baumann
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Atherosclerosis: Making a U Turn.

Authors:  Ira J Goldberg; Gaurav Sharma; Edward A Fisher
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 2.  Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes by imaging coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Faraz Pathan; Kazuaki Negishi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-08

Review 3.  Coronary Atherosclerosis Imaging.

Authors:  Michael Y Henein; Sergio Vancheri; Gani Bajraktari; Federico Vancheri
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.