Literature DB >> 16311755

Relationship between Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire and cervical spine MR imaging findings.

Estanislao Arana1, Luis Martí-Bonmatí, Ruben Montijano, Daniel Bautista, Enrique Molla, Salvador Costa.   

Abstract

The study was aimed at determining the association between the self-report of pain and disability by means of Northwick neck pain questionnaire (NPQ) and cervical spine MR imaging findings. A random sample of 251 patients, 132 men and 119 women aged 43+/-13 years, submitted with neck pain were investigated. Patients with previous discitis, surgery, neoplasm or hospitalized for cervical spine trauma were excluded. All patients completed the NPQ and were studied with sagittal gradient-echo T1 and turbo spin-echo T2, axial gradient-echo T2* and heavily T2 weighted MR myelographic weighted images. MR images of the two most affected disc levels were read, offering an MR imaging score from 0 to 30. There was no statistically significant correlation between NPQ and MR imaging scores. From the NPQ items, only difficulty in sleeping and numbness were related to the MR imaging score. Disc extrusion was the only MR finding almost significantly associated with NPQ (P=0.054). Neck injury did not increase NPQ scores. In patients with neck pain, NPQ scores do not correlate with MR imaging findings. NPQ and cervical spine MR imaging show different facets of the multidimensional complex of neck pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311755      PMCID: PMC3233950          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0001-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  32 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of degenerative diseases in the cervical spine.

Authors:  R D Boutin; L S Steinbach; K Finnesey
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Spanish version of the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire: reliability and validity.

Authors:  T González; A Balsa; J Sáinz de Murieta; E Zamorano; I González; E Martin-Mola
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.473

3.  New evaluation method using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Y Kasai; A Uchida
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  The relationship between facet joint osteoarthritis and disc degeneration of the lumbar spine: an MRI study.

Authors:  A Fujiwara; K Tamai; M Yamato; H S An; H Yoshida; K Saotome; A Kurihashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  The degenerative cervical spine: pathogenesis and rehabilitation concepts.

Authors:  P McClure
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

6.  The value of MR imaging in differentiating between hard and soft cervical disc disease: a comparison with intraoperative findings.

Authors:  D K Sengupta; R Kirollos; G F Findlay; E T Smith; J C Pearson; T Pigott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Comparison of computed tomography myelography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  F F Shafaie; F J Wippold; M Gado; T K Pilgram; K D Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Genetic influences on cervical and lumbar disc degeneration: a magnetic resonance imaging study in twins.

Authors:  P N Sambrook; A J MacGregor; T D Spector
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-02

9.  The classification of outcome following whiplash injury--a comparison of methods.

Authors:  B J A Lankester; N Garneti; G C Bannister
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Self reported health status and magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  W Hollingworth; A K Dixon; C J Todd; M I Bell; N M Antoun; Q Arafat; S Girling; K R Karia; R J Laing
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cervical spine intervertebral kinematics with respect to the head are different during flexion and extension motions.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.712

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.