Literature DB >> 12600732

Improvement of a porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer technique by optimizing donor cell and recipient oocyte preparations.

Gab-sang Lee1, Sang-hwan Hyun, Hye-soo Kim, Dae-young Kim, So-hyun Lee, Jeong-mook Lim, Eun-song Lee, Sung-keun Kang, Byeong-chun Lee, Woo-suk Hwang.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to improve a porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) technique by optimizing donor cell and recipient oocyte preparations. Adult and fetal fibroblasts, and cumulus and oviduct cells were used as donor cells, and in vivo- and in vitro-matured oocytes were employed as recipient oocytes. The percentages of fusion and development to the blastocyst stage, the ratio of blastocysts to 2-cell embryos, and cell number of blastocysts were monitored as experimental parameters. In Experiment 1, donor cells of four different types were transferred to enucleated oocytes matured in vitro, and more (P < 0.05) blastocysts were derived from SCNT of fetal fibroblasts than from that of other cells (15.9% versus 3.1-7.9%). For SCNT using fetal fibroblasts, increasing the number of subcultures up to 15 times did not improve developmental competence to the blastocyst stage (12.2-16.7%). In Experiment 2, fetal fibroblasts were transferred to enucleated oocytes that matured in vivo or in vitro. When parthenogenetic activation of both types of oocytes was conducted as a preliminary control treatment, a significant increase in blastocyst formation was found for in vivo-matured compared with in vitro-matured oocytes (36.4% versus 29.5%). However, no improvement was achieved in SCNT using in vivo-matured oocytes. In conclusion, the type of donor somatic cell is important for improving development after porcine SCNT, and fetal fibroblasts were the most effective among examined cells. A system with good reproducibility has been established using fetal fibroblasts as the donor karyoplast after subculturing 1-10 times, and using both in vivo and in vitro-matured oocytes as the recipient cytoplast. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12600732     DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01294-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  16 in total

1.  Screening somatic cell nuclear transfer parameters for generation of transgenic cloned cattle with intragenomic integration of additional gene copies that encode bovine adipocyte-type fatty acid-binding protein (A-FABP).

Authors:  Yong Guo; Hejuan Li; Ying Wang; Xingrong Yan; Xihui Sheng; Di Chang; Xiaolong Qi; Xiangguo Wang; Yunhai Liu; Junya Li; Hemin Ni
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 2.  Cloned human embryonic stem cells for tissue repair and transplantation.

Authors:  Woo Suk Hwang; Byeong Chun Lee; Chang Kyu Lee; Sung Keun Kang
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming?

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Heterogeneous nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed by bovine oocytes and camel (Camelus bactrianus) skin fibroblasts and their subsequent development.

Authors:  Huanmin Zhou; Zhenhua Guo
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.416

5.  Factors Determining the Efficiency of Porcine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer: Data Analysis with Over 200,000 Reconstructed Embryos.

Authors:  Tianbin Liu; Hongwei Dou; Xi Xiang; Lin Li; Yong Li; Lin Lin; Xinzhi Pang; Yijie Zhang; Yu Chen; Jing Luan; Ying Xu; Zhenzhen Yang; Wenxian Yang; Huan Liu; Feida Li; Hui Wang; Huanming Yang; Lars Bolund; Gabor Vajta; Yutao Du
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.987

6.  Nucleus transfer efficiency of ear fibroblast cells isolated from Bama miniature pigs at various ages.

Authors:  Qing-Hua Wang; Yun Peng; Xin-Yong Cai; Meng Wan; Yu Liu; Hong Wei
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-31

7.  In vitro development of porcine transgenic nuclear-transferred embryos derived from newborn Guangxi Bama mini-pig kidney fibroblasts.

Authors:  Hongbo Liu; Peiru Lv; Xiangxing Zhu; Xianwei Wang; Xiaogan Yang; Erwei Zuo; Yangqing Lu; Shengsheng Lu; Kehuan Lu
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 8.  A New Toolbox in Experimental Embryology-Alternative Model Organisms for Studying Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Claudia Springer; Eckhard Wolf; Kilian Simmet
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-02

9.  Autologous somatic cell nuclear transfer in pigs using recipient oocytes and donor cells from the same animal.

Authors:  Eunsong Lee; Kilyoung Song
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.672

10.  Comparison of the efficiency of Banna miniature inbred pig somatic cell nuclear transfer among different donor cells.

Authors:  Hongjiang Wei; Yubo Qing; Weirong Pan; Hongye Zhao; Honghui Li; Wenmin Cheng; Lu Zhao; Chengsheng Xu; Hong Li; Si Li; Lei Ye; Taiyun Wei; Xiaobing Li; Guowen Fu; Wengui Li; Jige Xin; Yangzhi Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.