Literature DB >> 4051065

Using computers to identify complications after surgery.

L L Roos, S M Cageorge, E Austen, K N Lohr.   

Abstract

We used the Health Services Commission data from Manitoba, Canada to identify complications resulting from hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, and prostatectomy which led to hospital readmissions. For each procedure, two specialists independently judged whether the readmissions were for surgery-related complications on the basis of liberally interpreted literature guidelines. Then, each pair of physicians met to resolve differences; only complications agreed upon by physicians were retained in our computer-based analysis. The analysis was done in three steps: algorithms were developed using guidelines from the literature, physician input, and 1974 hospital claims; these were then modified using 1975 data; finally, the algorithms were tested with 1976 data. The computerized algorithms developed were compared with the clinical decisions of physician panels. The results showed high specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value. Given the increasing availability of routinely collected data bases, the possibilities for inexpensively monitoring the outcomes of different providers and institutions are appealing. More extensive validation and application of the methodology to a greater number of procedures are necessary to implement such a program.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4051065      PMCID: PMC1646712          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.75.11.1288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  Unnecessary-elective-indicated? Audit criteria of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to assess abdominal hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma.

Authors:  V R Jenkins
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1977-05

2.  A critical evaluation of the results of transurethral resection of the prostate.

Authors:  C P Chilton; R J Morgan; H R England; A M Paris; J P Blandy
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1978-12

3.  DRGs and hospital case records: implications for Medicare case mix accuracy.

Authors:  A N Johnson; G L Appel
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  DRGs and the future of surgical practice.

Authors:  H L Smits; R E Watson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Dealing with medical practice variations: a proposal for action.

Authors:  J E Wennberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Hysterectomies in one Canadian Province: a new look at risks and benefits.

Authors:  N P Roos
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Institutional responses to prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups. Implications for cost, quality, and access.

Authors:  R S Stern; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Quality of care in the New Mexico Medicaid program (1971-1975): the effect of the New Mexico Experimental Medical Care Review Organization on the use of antibiotics for common infectious diseases.

Authors:  K N Lohr; R H Brook; M A Kaufman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  DRG creep: a new hospital-acquired disease.

Authors:  D W Simborg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-06-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Improving hospital discharge data: lessons from the National Hospital Discharge Survey.

Authors:  L K Demlo; P M Campbell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Detecting adverse events using information technology.

Authors:  David W Bates; R Scott Evans; Harvey Murff; Peter D Stetson; Lisa Pizziferri; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Routine data: a resource for clinical audit?

Authors:  M McKee
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

3.  Coding for quality measurement: the relationship between hospital structural characteristics and coding accuracy from the perspective of quality measurement.

Authors:  Pavani Rangachari
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2007-04-16

4.  Measuring outcomes of hospital care using multiple risk-adjusted indexes.

Authors:  S DesHarnais; L F McMahon; R Wroblewski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough?

Authors:  E L Hannan; M J Racz; J G Jollis; E D Peterson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Ethnic variation in cholecystectomy rates and outcomes, Manitoba, Canada, 1972-84.

Authors:  M M Cohen; T K Young; K M Hammarstrand
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Software for health care analysts: a modular approach.

Authors:  L L Roos; A Wajda; S M Sharp; J P Nicol
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Medical audit by claims data?

Authors:  J P Bunker; J Fowles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Development of a computerized database for the study of anaesthesia care.

Authors:  D K Rose; M M Cohen; D F Wigglesworth; D A Yee
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Potential identifiability and preventability of adverse events using information systems.

Authors:  D W Bates; A C O'Neil; D Boyle; J Teich; G M Chertow; A L Komaroff; T A Brennan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.