Literature DB >> 17998112

Identifying modifiable barriers to medication error reporting in the nursing home setting.

Steven M Handler1, Subashan Perera, Ellen F Olshansky, Stephanie A Studenski, David A Nace, Douglas B Fridsma, Joseph T Hanlon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To have health care professionals in nursing homes identify organizational-level and individual-level modifiable barriers to medication error reporting.
DESIGN: Nominal group technique sessions to identify potential barriers, followed by development and administration of a 20-item cross-sectional mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: Representatives of 4 professions (physicians, pharmacists, advanced practitioners, and nurses) from 4 independently owned, nonprofit nursing homes that had an average bed size of 150, were affiliated with an academic medical center, and were located in urban and suburban areas. MEASUREMENTS: Barriers identified in the nominal group technique sessions were used to design a 20-item survey. Survey respondents used 5-point Likert scales to score factors in terms of their likelihood of posing a barrier ("very unlikely" to "very likely") and their modifiability ("not modifiable" to "very modifiable"). Immediate action factors were identified as factors with mean scores of <3.0 on the likelihood and modifiability scales, and represent barriers that should be addressed to increase medication error reporting frequency.
RESULTS: In 4 nominal group technique sessions, 28 professionals identified factors to include in the survey. The survey was mailed to all 154 professionals in the 4 nursing homes, and 104 (67.5%) responded. Response rates by facility ranged from 55.8% to 92.9%, and rates by profession ranged from 52.0% for physicians to 100.0% for pharmacists. Most respondents (75.0%) were women. Respondents had worked for a mean of 9.8 years in nursing homes and 5.4 years in their current facility. Of 20 survey items, 14 (70%) had scores that categorized them as immediate action factors, 9 (64%) of which were organizational barriers. Of these factors, the 3 considered most modifiable were (1) lack of a readily available medication error reporting system or forms, (2) lack of information on how to report a medication error, and (3) lack of feedback to the reporter or rest of the facility on medication errors that have been reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The study results provide a broad-based perspective of the barriers to medication error reporting in the nursing home setting. Efforts to improve medication error reporting frequency should focus on organizational-level rather than individual-level interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17998112      PMCID: PMC2151929          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  36 in total

Review 1.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review.

Authors:  Phil Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike Clarke; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Sarah Pratap; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-18

2.  Reporting of adverse events.

Authors:  Lucian L Leape
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Pittsburgh Regional Healthcare Initiative: a systems approach for achieving perfect patient care.

Authors:  Carl A Sirio; Kenneth T Segel; Donna J Keyser; Edward I Harrison; Jon C Lloyd; Robert J Weber; Carlene A Muto; D Geoffrey Webster; Vickie Pisowicz; Karen Wolk Feinstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Medication errors and adverse drug events in nursing homes: problems, causes, regulations, and proposed solutions.

Authors:  J Dimant
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.669

5.  Using a modified nominal group technique to elicit director of nursing input for an osteoporosis intervention.

Authors:  Deborah A Levine; Kenneth G Saag; Linda L Casebeer; Cathleen Colon-Emeric; Kenneth W Lyles; Richard M Shewchuk
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  A real-time medical event reporting and prevention system in long-term care.

Authors:  Pamela A Carroll-Solomon; Diane S Denny
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.095

7.  Patient safety culture assessment in the nursing home.

Authors:  S M Handler; N G Castle; S A Studenski; S Perera; D B Fridsma; D A Nace; J T Hanlon
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-12

Review 8.  Detecting adverse events for patient safety research: a review of current methodologies.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Vimla L Patel; George Hripcsak; David W Bates
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 6.317

9.  Using focus groups to understand physicians' and nurses' perspectives on error reporting in hospitals.

Authors:  Donna B Jeffe; William Claiborne Dunagan; Jane Garbutt; Thomas E Burroughs; Thomas H Gallagher; Patricia R Hill; Carolyn B Harris; Kerry Bommarito; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2004-09

10.  Medication errors observed in 36 health care facilities.

Authors:  Kenneth N Barker; Elizabeth A Flynn; Ginette A Pepper; David W Bates; Robert L Mikeal
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-09
View more
  19 in total

1.  Biosafety Training and Incident-reporting Practices in the United States: A 2008 Survey of Biosafety Professionals.

Authors:  Allison T Chamberlain; Louann C Burnett; Jennifer P King; Ellen S Whitney; Sean G Kaufman; Ruth L Berkelman
Journal:  Appl Biosaf       Date:  2009

2.  Surveying multiple health professional team members within institutional settings: an example from the nursing home industry.

Authors:  Melissa A Clark; Anthony Roman; Michelle L Rogers; Denise A Tyler; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Exploration of the barriers of reporting nursing errors in intensive care units: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Hamid Peyrovi; Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi; Sina Valiee
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2016-03-15

4.  A randomized trial of the impact of survey design characteristics on response rates among nursing home providers.

Authors:  Melissa Clark; Michelle Rogers; Andrew Foster; Faye Dvorchak; Frances Saadeh; Jessica Weaver; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  Safety culture of nursing homes: opinions of top managers.

Authors:  Nicholas G Castle; Laura M Wagner; Jamie C Ferguson; Steven M Handler
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun

6.  Assessing patient safety culture of internal medicine house staff in an academic teaching hospital.

Authors:  Harish Jasti; Heena Sheth; Margaret Verrico; Subashan Perera; Gregory Bump; Deborah Simak; Raquel Buranosky; Steven M Handler
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

7.  Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of reporting of clinical adverse events scale (C-RoCAES).

Authors:  Xiao Sun; Yan Shi; Shuying Zhang; Meimei Tian; Yafen Mao; Qian Wu; Xiaoping Zhu; Meifang Gong
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 8.  Enhancing Patient Safety Event Reporting. A Systematic Review of System Design Features.

Authors:  Yang Gong; Hong Kang; Xinshuo Wu; Lei Hua
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Home-care nurses' perceptions of unmet information needs and communication difficulties of older patients in the immediate post-hospital discharge period.

Authors:  Katrina M Romagnoli; Steven M Handler; Frank M Ligons; Harry Hochheiser
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Medication incident reporting in residential aged care facilities: limitations and risks to residents' safety.

Authors:  Amina Tariq; Andrew Georgiou; Johanna Westbrook
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.