Literature DB >> 12593329

Superlatent inhibition and spontaneous recovery: differential effects of pre- and postconditioning CS-alone presentations after long delays in different contexts.

R E Lubow1, L G De la Casa.   

Abstract

In two pairs of three-stage conditioned taste aversion experiments, we examined the effects of delay interval (1 or 21 days) between the second and third stages, and of context in which the animals spent the delay (same as or different from the context of the other stages) on latent inhibition (LI) and spontaneous recovery following extinction. In the LI experiments (Experiments 1A and 1B), the first stage comprised nonreinforced presentations to saccharin or to water. In the second stage, rats were conditioned by saccharin paired with LiCl. In the extinction experiments (Experiments 2A and 2B), the order of the stages was reversed. For all experiments, Stage 3, the test stage, consisted of three presentations of saccharin alone. There was a super-LI effect in the saccharin-preexposed group that spent the 21-day delay in the different context (Experiment 1A). When the delay was spent in the same context, there was no difference in the amount of LI between the short- and long-delay groups (Experiment 1B). Conversely, there was a spontaneous recovery effect in the long-delay/same-context group (Experiment 2B), but not in the long-delay/different-context group (Experiment 2A). The pattern of results, incompatible with current explanations of delay-induced changes in memory performance, was interpreted in terms of an interaction between the delay conditions (same or different delay context), which modulate the extinction of previously acquired context-CS-nothing associations (during CS-alone presentations), and primacy effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12593329     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Learn Behav        ISSN: 0090-4996


  22 in total

1.  Hippocampal formation supports conditioning to memory of a context.

Authors:  Jerry W Rudy; Ruth M Barrientos; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Postconditioning recovery from the latent inhibition effect in conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  L Bakner; K Strohen; M Nordeen; D C Riccio
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1991-12

3.  Retroactive and proactive inhibition after 5 and 48 hours.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-02

4.  Sexually dimorphic extinction of a conditioned taste aversion in rats.

Authors:  K C Chambers; C B Sengstake
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  1976-05

5.  Loss of latent inhibition of contextual conditioning following non-reinforced context exposure in rats.

Authors:  A S Killcross; M J Kiernan; D Dwyer; R F Westbrook
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1998-02

6.  Context specificity of latent inhibition in taste aversion learning.

Authors:  G Hall; S Channell
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1986-05

7.  Latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion: the roles of stimulus frequency and duration and the amount of fluid ingested during preexposure.

Authors:  G De la Casa; R E Lubow
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 8.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Latent inhibition in humans: data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia.

Authors:  R E Lubow; J C Gewirtz
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  7 in total

1.  An empirical analysis of the super-latent inhibition effect.

Authors:  L G De la Casa; R E Lubow
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

2.  Interaction of retention interval with CS-preexposure and extinction treatments: symmetry with respect to primacy.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Trial order and retention interval in human predictive judgment.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Jeffrey C Amundson; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

Review 4.  There is a time and a place for everything: bidirectional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation.

Authors:  R E Lubow; L G De la Casa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

5.  Sensory-specific associations in flavor-preference reversal learning.

Authors:  Janina Scarlet; Vincent Campese; Andrew R Delamater
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  A limited role for mediodorsal thalamus in devaluation tasks.

Authors:  Charles L Pickens
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Spontaneous recovery of excitation and inhibition.

Authors:  Heather T Sissons; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.