Literature DB >> 12141132

An empirical analysis of the super-latent inhibition effect.

L G De la Casa1, R E Lubow.   

Abstract

In three conditioned taste aversion experiments, we examined the roles of several variables in producing super-latent inhibition (LI). This effect, greater LI after a long interval than after a short interval between the conditioning and the test stages (De la Casa & Lubow, 2000), was shown to increase with the number of stimulus preexposures (0, 2, or 4; Experiment 1) and with the length of the delay interval (1, 7, 14, or 21 days; Experiment 2). Furthermore, super-LI was obtained when the delay interval was introduced between the conditioning and the test stages (Experiments 1 and 2), but not when it was introduced between the preexposure and the conditioning stages (Experiment 3). The results are discussed in relation to interference explanations of LI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12141132     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Learn Behav        ISSN: 0090-4996


  15 in total

1.  Loss of latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion following exposure to a novel flavour before test.

Authors:  S Killcross
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-08

2.  Superlatent inhibition and spontaneous recovery: differential effects of pre- and postconditioning CS-alone presentations after long delays in different contexts.

Authors:  R E Lubow; L G De la Casa
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-11

3.  Postconditioning recovery from the latent inhibition effect in conditioned taste aversion.

Authors:  L Bakner; K Strohen; M Nordeen; D C Riccio
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1991-12

4.  Additivity of the effects of retention interval and context change on latent inhibition: toward resolution of the context forgetting paradox.

Authors:  J M Rosas; M E Bouton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-07

5.  Unconditioned stimulus intensity and retention interval effects.

Authors:  W R Batsell; J W George
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1996-12

6.  The Importance of Context in the US Preexposure Effect in CTA: Novel versus Latently Inhibited Contextual Stimuli

Authors: 
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  1996-11

Review 7.  Latent inhibition.

Authors:  R E Lubow
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Latent inhibition in conditioned taste aversion: the roles of stimulus frequency and duration and the amount of fluid ingested during preexposure.

Authors:  G De la Casa; R E Lubow
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 9.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  16 in total

1.  Superlatent inhibition and spontaneous recovery: differential effects of pre- and postconditioning CS-alone presentations after long delays in different contexts.

Authors:  R E Lubow; L G De la Casa
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-11

2.  Massive preexposure and preexposure in multiple contexts attenuate the context specificity of latent inhibition.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Raymond C Chang; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  The role of injection cues in the production of the morphine preexposure effect in taste aversion learning.

Authors:  Catherine M Davis; Isabel de Brugada; Anthony L Riley
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Interaction of retention interval with CS-preexposure and extinction treatments: symmetry with respect to primacy.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Steven C Stout; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Trial order and retention interval in human predictive judgment.

Authors:  Steven C Stout; Jeffrey C Amundson; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

6.  Effects of preexposure and retention interval placement on latent inhibition and perceptual learning in a choice-maze discrimination task.

Authors:  L G De La Casa; William Timberlake
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Primacy effects induced by temporal or physical context shifts are attenuated by a preshift test trial.

Authors:  Daniel S Wheeler; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 8.  There is a time and a place for everything: bidirectional modulations of latent inhibition by time-induced context differentiation.

Authors:  R E Lubow; L G De la Casa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

9.  Facilitation of taste memory acquisition by experiencing previous novel taste is protein-synthesis dependent.

Authors:  Maayan Merhav; Kobi Rosenblum
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Challenges Facing Contemporary Associative Approaches to Acquired Behavior.

Authors:  Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2006-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.