OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the process of reverse left ventricular remodelling in response to carvedilol is dependent on baseline heart rate (BHR), heart rhythm, or heart rate reduction (HRR) in response to carvedilol. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of serial echocardiograms in 257 patients with chronic systolic heart failure at baseline and at 12-18 months after starting carvedilol. Reverse left ventricular remodelling was determined by changes in left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD), end systolic dimension (LVESD), and fractional shortening (LVFS). SETTING: Heart failure clinic within a university teaching hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in LVEDD, LVESD, and LVFS. RESULTS: LVEDD and LVESD decreased by 2.6 (0.4) mm and 4.9 (0.5) mm, respectively (mean (SEM)), and LVFS increased by 4.3 (0.5)% (all p < 0.0001 v baseline). Simple regression revealed no significant relation between BHR or HRR and the changes in LVEDD, LVESD, or LVFS. Stratification of patients into high and low BHR groups (above and below the mean) or according to the baseline heart rhythm (sinus rhythm v atrial fibrillation) showed no differences between groups in the extent of reverse left ventricular remodelling. Improvements in left ventricular function and dimensions were associated with significant improvements in New York Heart Association functional class. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of carvedilol in terms of reverse left ventricular remodelling and symptomatic improvement in patients with chronic heart failure are independent of BHR, heart rhythm, and the HRR that occurs in response to carvedilol.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the process of reverse left ventricular remodelling in response to carvedilol is dependent on baseline heart rate (BHR), heart rhythm, or heart rate reduction (HRR) in response to carvedilol. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of serial echocardiograms in 257 patients with chronic systolic heart failure at baseline and at 12-18 months after starting carvedilol. Reverse left ventricular remodelling was determined by changes in left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVEDD), end systolic dimension (LVESD), and fractional shortening (LVFS). SETTING:Heart failure clinic within a university teaching hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in LVEDD, LVESD, and LVFS. RESULTS: LVEDD and LVESD decreased by 2.6 (0.4) mm and 4.9 (0.5) mm, respectively (mean (SEM)), and LVFS increased by 4.3 (0.5)% (all p < 0.0001 v baseline). Simple regression revealed no significant relation between BHR or HRR and the changes in LVEDD, LVESD, or LVFS. Stratification of patients into high and low BHR groups (above and below the mean) or according to the baseline heart rhythm (sinus rhythm v atrial fibrillation) showed no differences between groups in the extent of reverse left ventricular remodelling. Improvements in left ventricular function and dimensions were associated with significant improvements in New York Heart Association functional class. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of carvedilol in terms of reverse left ventricular remodelling and symptomatic improvement in patients with chronic heart failure are independent of BHR, heart rhythm, and the HRR that occurs in response to carvedilol.
Authors: P Lechat; J S Hulot; S Escolano; A Mallet; A Leizorovicz; M Werhlen-Grandjean; G Pochmalicki; H Dargie Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-03-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: K A Schleman; J A Lindenfeld; B D Lowes; M R Bristow; D Ferguson; E E Wolfel; W T Abraham; L S Zisman Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: J M Cruickshank; G Neil-Dwyer; J P Degaute; Y Hayes; T Kuurne; J Kytta; J L Vincent; M E Carruthers; S Patel Journal: Lancet Date: 1987-09-12 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sandra Amorim; João Rodrigues; Manuel Campelo; Brenda Moura; Elisabete Martins; Filipe Macedo; J Silva-Cardoso; M Júlia Maciel Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-12-24 Impact factor: 2.357