Torfinn Eriksen-Volnes1,2, Arne Westheim3, Lars Gullestad4,5,6, Eva Kjøl Slind1, Morten Grundtvig1,7. 1. Department of Medicine and Healthcare, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway. 2. Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway. 3. Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Oslo, Norway. 4. K.G. Jebsen Centre for Cardiac Research and Centre for Heart Failure Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 5. Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. 6. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 7. Lillehammer Division, Department of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Lillehammer, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Use of β-blockers and titration to the highest tolerated dose are highly recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for treatment of chronic heart failure (HF) with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but little attention has been paid to the achieved heart rate (HR) during this treatment. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to examine the achieved HR in relation to the use of β-blockers in these patients. METHODS: All of the patients (n = 2,689) in the National Norwegian Heart Failure Registry as part of the Norwegian Cardiovascular Disease Registry with a sinus rhythm and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% at stable follow-up visiting specialised hospital outpatient HF clinics in Norway were included. The β-blocker doses were calculated as a percent of the target dose according to ESC HF guidelines. Differences between baseline variables according to the achieved HR were analysed by the Student's t test for continuous variables and Pearson's χ2 test for categorical variables. Linear regression was used to determine the predictors of HR ≥70 beats/min (bpm) in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One third of the patients had a resting HR ≥70 bpm. Of the patients with an HR ≥70 bpm, 72.3% used less than the target dose of β-blocker; they were younger and had a higher NYHA class, more diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and higher N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates compared to the patients with an HR <70 bpm. The 1-year mortality was 3.1, 3.7, 5.8, and 9.1% among the patients with an HR <70, 70-79, 80-89, and >89 bpm, respectively. Only 2 patients used ivabradine. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFrEF and sinus rhythm, an HR ≥70 bpm was associated with worse clinical variables and outcomes. A high proportion of the patients who had an HR ≥70 bpm was not treated with or/did not tolerate the target dose of a β-blocker, although the β-blocker dose was higher than in patients with an HR <70 bpm. This may suggest that increased efforts should be made to further increase the β-blocker dose, and treatment with ivabradine could be considered among patients with an HR ≥70 bpm.
BACKGROUND: Use of β-blockers and titration to the highest tolerated dose are highly recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for treatment of chronic heart failure (HF) with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but little attention has been paid to the achieved heart rate (HR) during this treatment. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to examine the achieved HR in relation to the use of β-blockers in these patients. METHODS: All of the patients (n = 2,689) in the National Norwegian Heart Failure Registry as part of the Norwegian Cardiovascular Disease Registry with a sinus rhythm and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% at stable follow-up visiting specialised hospital outpatient HF clinics in Norway were included. The β-blocker doses were calculated as a percent of the target dose according to ESC HF guidelines. Differences between baseline variables according to the achieved HR were analysed by the Student's t test for continuous variables and Pearson's χ2 test for categorical variables. Linear regression was used to determine the predictors of HR ≥70 beats/min (bpm) in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: One third of the patients had a resting HR ≥70 bpm. Of the patients with an HR ≥70 bpm, 72.3% used less than the target dose of β-blocker; they were younger and had a higher NYHA class, more diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and higher N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates compared to the patients with an HR <70 bpm. The 1-year mortality was 3.1, 3.7, 5.8, and 9.1% among the patients with an HR <70, 70-79, 80-89, and >89 bpm, respectively. Only 2 patients used ivabradine. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HFrEF and sinus rhythm, an HR ≥70 bpm was associated with worse clinical variables and outcomes. A high proportion of the patients who had an HR ≥70 bpm was not treated with or/did not tolerate the target dose of a β-blocker, although the β-blocker dose was higher than in patients with an HR <70 bpm. This may suggest that increased efforts should be made to further increase the β-blocker dose, and treatment with ivabradine could be considered among patients with an HR ≥70 bpm.
Authors: Finlay A McAlister; Natasha Wiebe; Justin A Ezekowitz; Alexander A Leung; Paul W Armstrong Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Monica M Colvin; Mark H Drazner; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Gregg C Fonarow; Michael M Givertz; Steven M Hollenberg; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; Pamela N Peterson; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Cheryl Westlake Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: John J V McMurray; Scott D Solomon; Silvio E Inzucchi; Lars Køber; Mikhail N Kosiborod; Felipe A Martinez; Piotr Ponikowski; Marc S Sabatine; Inder S Anand; Jan Bělohlávek; Michael Böhm; Chern-En Chiang; Vijay K Chopra; Rudolf A de Boer; Akshay S Desai; Mirta Diez; Jaroslaw Drozdz; Andrej Dukát; Junbo Ge; Jonathan G Howlett; Tzvetana Katova; Masafumi Kitakaze; Charlotta E A Ljungman; Béla Merkely; Jose C Nicolau; Eileen O'Meara; Mark C Petrie; Pham N Vinh; Morten Schou; Sergey Tereshchenko; Subodh Verma; Claes Held; David L DeMets; Kieran F Docherty; Pardeep S Jhund; Olof Bengtsson; Mikaela Sjöstrand; Anna-Maria Langkilde Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Marco Metra; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Karl Swedberg; John G F Cleland; Andrea Di Lenarda; Michel Komajda; Willem J Remme; Beatrix Lutiger; Armin Scherhag; Mary Ann Lukas; Andrew Charlesworth; Philip A Poole-Wilson Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2005-07-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Marlena V Habal; Peter P Liu; Peter C Austin; Heather J Ross; Gary E Newton; Xuesong Wang; Jack V Tu; Douglas S Lee Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 8.790