Literature DB >> 12590610

Thermal and urea-induced unfolding of the marginally stable lac repressor DNA-binding domain: a model system for analysis of solute effects on protein processes.

Daniel J Felitsky1, M Thomas Record.   

Abstract

Thermodynamic and structural evidence indicates that the DNA binding domains of lac repressor (lacI) exhibit significant conformational adaptability in operator binding, and that the marginally stable helix-turn-helix (HTH) recognition element is greatly stabilized by operator binding. Here we use circular dichroism at 222 nm to quantify the thermodynamics of the urea- and thermally induced unfolding of the marginally stable lacI HTH. Van't Hoff analysis of the two-state unfolding data, highly accurate because of the large transition breadth and experimental access to the temperature of maximum stability (T(S); 6-10 degrees C), yields standard-state thermodynamic functions (deltaG(o)(obs), deltaH(o)(obs), deltaS(o)(obs), deltaC(o)(P,obs)) over the temperature range 4-40 degrees C and urea concentration range 0 </= C(3) </= 6 M. For unfolding the HTH, deltaG(o)(obs) decreases linearly with increasing C(3) at all temperatures examined, which directly confirms the validity of the linear extrapolation method (LEM) to obtain the intrinsic stability of this protein. At 25 degrees C (pH 7.3 and 50 mM K(+)), both linear extrapolation and extrapolation via the local-bulk domain model (LBDM) to C(3) = 0 yield deltaG(o)(obs) = 1.23 +/- 0.05 kcal mol(-)(1), in agreement with direct measurement (1.24 +/- 0.30 kcal mol(-)(1)). Like deltaG(o)(obs), both deltaH(o)(obs) and deltaS(o)(obs) decrease linearly with increasing C(3); the derivatives with respect to C(3) of deltaG(o)(obs), deltaH(o)(obs) and TdeltaS(o)(obs) (in cal mol(-)(1) M(-)(1)) are -449 +/- 11, -661 +/- 90, and -203 +/- 91 at 25 degrees C, indicating that the effect of urea on deltaG(o)(obs) is primarily enthalpic. The deltaC(o)(P,obs) of unfolding (0.63 +/- 0.05 kcal mol(-)(1) K(-)(1)) is not detectibly dependent on C(3) or temperature. The urea m-value of the lacI HTH (-d deltaG(o)(obs),/dC(3) = 449 +/- 11 cal mol(-)(1) M(-)(1) at 25 degrees C) is independent of C(3) up to at least 6 M. Use of the LBDM to fit the C(3)-dependence of deltaG(o)(obs) yields the local-bulk partition coefficient for accumulation of urea at the protein surface exposed upon denaturation: K(P) = 1.103 +/- 0.002 at 25 degrees C. This partition coefficient is the same within uncertainty as those previously determined by LBDM analysis of osmometric data for solutions of urea and native (folded) bovine serum albumin, as well as LBDM analysis of the proportionality of m-values to changes in water accessible surface area upon protein unfolding. From the correspondence between values of K(P), we conclude that the average local urea concentration at both folded and unfolded protein surface exceeds the bulk by approximately 10% at 25 degrees C. The observed decrease in m-value for the lacI HTH with increasing temperature, together with the observed reductions in both deltaH(o)(obs) and deltaS(o)(obs) of unfolding with increasing urea concentration, demonstrate that K(P) for urea decreases with increasing temperature and that transfer of urea from the bulk solution to the local domain at the protein surface exposed on denaturation is enthalpically driven and entropically unfavorable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12590610     DOI: 10.1021/bi0270992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  29 in total

1.  Quantifying why urea is a protein denaturant, whereas glycine betaine is a protein stabilizer.

Authors:  Emily J Guinn; Laurel M Pegram; Michael W Capp; Michelle N Pollock; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Equilibrium unfolding of the PDZ domain of β2-syntrophin.

Authors:  Gabriela María Torchio; Mario Roberto Ermácora; Mauricio Pablo Sica
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Why Hofmeister effects of many salts favor protein folding but not DNA helix formation.

Authors:  Laurel M Pegram; Timothy Wendorff; Robert Erdmann; Irina Shkel; Dana Bellissimo; Daniel J Felitsky; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Temperature-dependent structural changes in intrinsically disordered proteins: formation of alpha-helices or loss of polyproline II?

Authors:  Magnus Kjaergaard; Ann-Beth Nørholm; Ruth Hendus-Altenburger; Stine F Pedersen; Flemming M Poulsen; Birthe B Kragelund
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Cooperative alpha-helix unfolding in a protein-DNA complex from hydrogen-deuterium exchange.

Authors:  Roberto K Salinas; Tammo Diercks; Robert Kaptein; Rolf Boelens
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  Dynamics, energetics, and structure in protein folding.

Authors:  Athi N Naganathan; Urmi Doshi; Adam Fung; Mourad Sadqi; Victor Muñoz
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Getting specificity from simplicity in putative proteins from the prebiotic earth.

Authors:  Jaime López de la Osa; David A Bateman; Sylvia Ho; Carlos González; Avijit Chakrabartty; Douglas V Laurents
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Use of urea and glycine betaine to quantify coupled folding and probe the burial of DNA phosphates in lac repressor-lac operator binding.

Authors:  Jiang Hong; Mike W Capp; Ruth M Saecker; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Osmolyte-induced perturbations of hydrogen bonding between hydration layer waters: correlation with protein conformational changes.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Joel M Friedman
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  How flexible polymers interact with proteins and its relationship with the protein separation method by protein-polymer complex formation.

Authors:  Valeria Boeris; Beatriz Farruggia; Diana Romanini; Guillermo Picó
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.371

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.