Literature DB >> 12589891

Motor and parietal cortical areas both underlie kinaesthesia.

Patricia Romaiguère1, Jean-Luc Anton, Muriel Roth, Laurence Casini, Jean-Pierre Roll.   

Abstract

Tendon vibration has long been known to evoke perception of illusory movements through activation of muscle spindle primary endings. Few studies, however, have dealt with the cortical processes resulting in these kinaesthetic illusions. We conceived an fMRI experiment to investigate the cortical structures taking part in these illusory perceptions. Since muscle spindle afferents project onto different cortical areas involved in motor control it was necessary to discriminate between activation related to sensory processes and activation related to perceptual processes. To this end, we designed and compared different conditions. In two illusion conditions, covibration at different frequencies of the tendons of the right wrist flexor and extensor muscle groups evoked perception of slow or fast illusory movements. In a no illusion condition, covibration at the same frequency of the tendons of these antagonist muscle groups did not evoke a sensation of movement. Results showed activation of most cortical areas involved in sensorimotor control in both illusion conditions. However, in most areas, activation tended to be larger when the movement perceived was faster. In the no illusion condition, motor and premotor areas were little or not activated. Specific contrasts showed that perception of an illusory movement was specifically related to activation in the left premotor, sensorimotor, and parietal cortices as well as in bilateral supplementary motor and cingulate motor areas. We conclude that activation in motor as well as in parietal areas is necessary for a kinaesthetic sensation to arise.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12589891     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00221-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  34 in total

1.  Proprioceptive feedback in humans expresses motor invariants during writing.

Authors:  Frederic Albert; Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Michel Fiocchi; Mikael Bergenheim; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Prior experience and current goals affect muscle-spindle and tactile integration.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Countering postural posteffects following prolonged exposure to whole-body vibration: a sensorimotor treatment.

Authors:  Olivier Oullier; Anne Kavounoudias; Cyril Duclos; Frédéric Albert; Jean-Pierre Roll; Régine Roll
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effects of wrist tendon vibration on arm tracking in people poststroke.

Authors:  Megan O Conrad; Robert A Scheidt; Brian D Schmit
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The neural basis of central proprioceptive processing in older versus younger adults: an important sensory role for right putamen.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; James P Coxon; Annouchka Van Impe; Monique Geurts; Wim Van Hecke; Stefan Sunaert; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Gait-like vibration training improves gait abilities: a case report of a 62-year-old person with a chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Agnès Barthélémy; Dany H Gagnon; Cyril Duclos
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2016-07-21

7.  Boosted activation of right inferior frontoparietal network: a basis for illusory movement awareness.

Authors:  Fabien Cignetti; Marianne Vaugoyeau; Bruno Nazarian; Muriel Roth; Jean-Luc Anton; Christine Assaiante
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Short-term effect of neck muscle vibration on postural disturbances in stroke patients.

Authors:  Stéphanie Leplaideur; Emilie Leblong; Karim Jamal; Chloé Rousseau; Annelise Moulinet Raillon; Pauline Coignard; Mireille Damphousse; Isabelle Bonan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Muscular responses appear to be associated with existence of kinesthetic perception during combination of tendon co-vibration and motor imagery.

Authors:  Eriko Shibata; Fuminari Kaneko; Masaki Katayose
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Event-related desynchronization possibly discriminates the kinesthetic illusion induced by visual stimulation from movement observation.

Authors:  Eriko Shibata; Fuminari Kaneko
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.