| Literature DB >> 12589741 |
M Jacobson1, C Hård af Segerstad, A Gunnarsson, C Fellström, K de Verdier Klingenberg, P Wallgren, M Jensen-Waern.
Abstract
Diarrhoea among growing pigs (8-13 weeks old) is a significant problem in many herds. Nine herds with poor performance and diarrhoea among growing pigs were selected on the basis of their piglet mean age at a body weight of 25 kg, compared to the overall mean age in Swedish herds. In addition, four herds with good average performance and no problems with diarrhoea were selected. Pigs were necropsied and samples for histology and microbiology were collected. Based on the necropsy findings, the pigs from the good performing herds were all judged to be healthy. The presence of Brachyspira pilosicoli and Lawsonia intracellularis was significantly correlated to poor performing herds and the results indicate that these microbes are main pathogens involved in enteric diseases among Swedish grower pigs. In addition, concomitant infections with other presumptive pathogens were commonly found.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12589741 PMCID: PMC7127389 DOI: 10.1016/s0034-5288(02)00187-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Vet Sci ISSN: 0034-5288 Impact factor: 2.534
Samples for microbiology were collected and analysed as recorded
| Microorganism | Sampling site | Sampling material | Analysis method | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caecum, proximal colon, rectum | Swab, W CH | Culture | ||
| Distal ileum | Swab, W CH | Culture | ||
| Distal colon or rectum | Faeces | Culture | ||
| Distal jejunum | Swab | Culture | ||
| Ileum | Tissue specimen | PCR | ||
| Distal jejunum | Swab | Culture | ||
| Distal colon | Faeces, ∼30 g | Culture | ||
| Parasites | Distal colon or rectum | Faeces, 30–50 g | Flotation | |
| Rotavirus | Distal colon or rectum | Faeces | ELISA |
Swabs were rubbed against the gut wall and put in Amies transport medium with or without charcoal (Trans-system Amies W CH or W/O CH, Copan Italia, Brescia, Italy).
Selective enrichment in Rappaport broth was excluded.
The numbers of pigs with lesions at necropsy
| Poor performance herds | Good performance herds | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Case pigs ( | Control pigs ( | Control pigs ( | |
| Watery content in the intestines | 21 | 5 | 0 |
| Gross lesions | 21 | 5 | 0 |
| Small intestines | 19 | 5 | |
| Large intestines | 11 | 0 | |
| Microscopical lesions | 22 | 17 | 0 |
| Small intestines | 21 | 14 | |
| Large intestines | 21 | 13 | |
The pigs were selected from herds with an average “poor performance” and problems with diarrhoea among growing pigs, and from herds without diarrhoea among growing pigs and with average “good performance”. The case pigs had current clinical diarrhoea, whereas the controls were judged as healthy.
Fig. 1The ileum of a clinically healthy pig originating from a herd with an average good performance among growing pigs. The picture shows an example of a gut that is histologically judged as normal. No autolytic changes are present. H & E × 125.
Fig. 2A false brush border consisting of spirochetes intimately attached to the apical membrane of surface enterocytes in proximal colon. A false brush border was found in caecum and proximal colon of two pigs infected with Brachyspira pilosicoli. The pigs originated from two herds suffering from diarrhoea and poor average performance in growing pigs. H & E × 500.
Fig. 3Ileum from a pig with clinical diarrhoea, selected from a herd suffering from diarrhoea and poor average performance in growing pigs. Intracellular organisms are seen in the apical part of the crypt enterocytes and the presence of Lawsonia intracellularis was confirmed by PCR. Macroscopically, the lesions consisted of necrotic enteritis in distal jejunum and ileum. W-S × 250.
The microbial findings in pigs from herds with diarrhoeic problems in growing pigs and poor average performance, and in pigs from herds without any such problems and good average performance
| Animals | Coccidia | Parasites other | Rotavirus | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. Case pigs, | 13 (48%) | 16 (59%) | 4 (15%) | 4 (15%) | 8 (30%) | 18 (67%) | 0 | 3 (11%) | 2 (7%) | 1 (4%) | 1 (4%) |
| B. Controls, “poor”, | 7 (26%) | 10 (37%) | 10 (37%) | 0 | 6 (22%) | 11 (41%) | 0 | 6 (22%) | 0 | 5 (19%) | 0 |
| C. Controls, “good”, | 0 | 11 (92%) | 0 | 2 (17%) | 1 (8%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (8%) | 0 | 0 |
| Comparison A vs B | NS | NS | NS | – | NS | – | NS | – | – | – | |
| Comparison A+B vs C | – | NS | – | NS | – | – | – |
The case pigs had diarrhoea, whereas the controls were judged as healthy. The number of pigs in each group (%) from which each enteropathogen was isolated.
NS, not significant; –, the number of observations were to few to allow statistical calculations.
p⩽0.05.
p⩽0.01.
p⩽0.001.