Literature DB >> 22957130

Rodents on pig and chicken farms - a potential threat to human and animal health.

Annette Backhans1, Claes Fellström.   

Abstract

Rodents can cause major problems through spreading various diseases to animals and humans. The two main species of rodents most commonly found on farms around the world are the house mouse (Mus musculus) and the brown rat (Rattus norvegicus). Both species are omnivorous and can breed year-round under favourable conditions. This review describes the occurrence of pathogens in rodents on specialist pig and chicken farms, which are usually closed units with a high level of bio-security. However, wild rodents may be difficult to exclude completely, even from these sites, and can pose a risk of introducing and spreading pathogens. This article reviews current knowledge regarding rodents as a hazard for spreading disease on farms. Most literature available regards zoonotic pathogens, while the literature regarding pathogens that cause disease in farm animals is more limited.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chicken; infections; pigs; rodents; zoonoses

Year:  2012        PMID: 22957130      PMCID: PMC3426328          DOI: 10.3402/iee.v2i0.17093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol        ISSN: 2000-8686


Rodents can cause major problems due to destruction and contamination of food, and also by the spread of various diseases. This review describes the occurrence of pathogens in rodents specifically on pig and chicken farms. The emphasis is on zoonotic pathogens that are indirectly transmitted to humans through contaminated food, or pathogens that cause important diseases in pigs. The order Rodentia (L. rodere, to gnaw) constitutes the most successful mammalian group, both in terms of the number of species and individuals (1). Two commensal (L. cum mensa, sharing a table) species are common inhabitants on farms worldwide: the house mouse (Mus musculus) and the brown rat syn. norwegian rat (Rattus norvegicus). Both species originated from Asia, from where they spread over the world along with the development of agriculture, which provided shelter and supplies of food. They are underground dwellers, omnivorous and can breed year-round when conditions are optimal (1, 2). The house mouse weighs 12–30 g, eats vegetables or any available food, and is active at any hour of the day. It manages well without water for a substantial time and can adapt to temperatures down to 10 °C (1). Its home range is less than 10 m2 and daily movement of an individual mouse is only a few square or cubic metres. A female can produce up to 10–14 l, each containing 3–12 puppies per year (2). The brown rat usually weighs 200–400 g and lives in territorial colonies with population densities on farms of 50–300 individuals. Compared with the house mouse, it has a rather large home range of 25–150 m in diameter, but individual rats can move 3 km away and back in one night (2), and rats are more active during night time (3).

Rodents as carriers of zoonotic disease

On farms, the risk of rodent-borne spread of pathogens to production animals is obvious due to the difficulty of excluding rodents from animal houses. Several studies have focused on rodents as possible carriers of various pathogens. Table 1 shows selected studies regarding rodents as carriers of zoonotic pathogens. Included in the table are studies published in international peer-reviewed journals, on rodents caught on pig or chicken farms and their surroundings. Results regarding rodent species other than brown rats, black rats, and house mice have been excluded.
Table 1

Selected studies on rodents as carriers of human pathogens on pig and chicken farms

Pathogen studiedReferenceRodent speciesCountryLocationDetection methodDetection rate
Salmonella EnteritidisDavies and Wray (14) MiceGreat BritainBroiler & layer breeder flocksCulture29/84
Salmonella EnteritidisLapuz, Tani et al. (106) R. rattus JapanLayer farmsCulture113/851
Salmonella Infantis158/851
Salmonella LivingstoneMeerburg, Jacobs-Reitsma et al. (11) R. norvegicus NsOrganic farmsCulture0/8
M. musculus 1/83
Salmonella spp.Pocock, Searle et al. (18) M. musculus domesticus UKMixed farmsCulture0/341
Salmonella EnteritidisHenzler and Opitz (16) M. musculus USAPoultry farmsCulture116/715
Salmonella sp.Le Moine, Vannier et al. (107) R. norvegicus FrancePig farmsCulture1/40
M. musculus 2/34
Campylobacter spp.Meerburg, Jacobs-Reitsma et al. (11) R. norvegicus nsOrganic farmsCulture1/8
M. musculus 8/83
Campylobacter jejuni Le Moine, Vannier et al. (107) R. norvegicus FrancePig farmsCulture16/40
M. musculus 4/34
Yersinia spp. biotype 1APocock, Searle et al. (18) M. musculus UKMixed farmsCulture21/354
Yersinia (Y.) enterocolitica O:3Aldova, Cerny et al. (24) R. rattus CzechoslovakiaPig housesCulture16/96
Y. enterocolitica O:3Pokorna and Aldova (108) R. rattus CzechoslovakiaPig housesCulture5/36
Y. enterocolitica 4/O:3Kaneko, Hamada et al. (25) R. norvegicus JapanSlaughter-house, barn, zooCulture2/270
R. rattus
Y. enterocolitica 4/O:3Backhans, Fellström et al. (26) R. norvegicus SwedenPig farmTaqMan PCR7/56
M. musculus 2/120
Y. pseudotuberculosis Pocock, Searle et al. (18) M. musculus UKMixed farmsCulture1/354
Y. pseudotuberculosis Kaneko, Hamada et al. (35) R. norvegicus JapanBarnCulture8/259
R. rattus 0/11
Y. pseudotuberculosis Aldova, Cerny et al. (24) R. rattus CzechoslovakiaPig housesCulture16/178
R. norvegicus
Y. pseudotuberculosis Backhans, Fellström et al. (26) R. norvegicus SwedenPig farmTaqMan PCR0/56
M. musculus 1/120
Cryptosporidium parvum Quy, Cowan et al. (65) R. norvegicus UKFarmsIFAT105/438
Cryptosporidium parvum Webster and MacDonald (66) R. norvegicus UKRuralModified Ziehl-Nielsen46/73
Leptospira spp.Webster, Ellis et al. (40) R. norvegicus UKMixed farmsMAT, ELISA, cultivation37/259
Listeria spp.Webster, Ellis et al. (109) R. norvegicus UKRuralCultivation5/44
Trichinella spiralis Stojcevic, Zivicnjak et al. (61) R. norvegicus CroatiaPig farmsns18/2287
Trichinella spiralis Leiby, Duffy et al. (110) R. norvegicus USAPig farmPeptic digestion188/443
Toxoplasma gondii Kijlstra, Meerburg et al. (50) R. rattus NetherlandsOrganic pig farmsTaqMan PCR4/39
M. musculus 2/31
Toxoplasma gondii Smith, Zimmerman et al. (56) R. norvegicus USAPig farmsSerology (MAT)0/9
M. musculus 2/588
Toxoplasma gondii Webster (111) R. norvegicus UKRuralILAT ELISA84/235
HantavirusWebster (111) R. norvegicus UKRuralELISA5/173

R, Rattus; M, Mus; ns, not specified; IFAT, indirect immunofluorescent antibody test; MAT, microscopic agglutination test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ILAT, indirect latex agglutination test.

Selected studies on rodents as carriers of human pathogens on pig and chicken farms R, Rattus; M, Mus; ns, not specified; IFAT, indirect immunofluorescent antibody test; MAT, microscopic agglutination test; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ILAT, indirect latex agglutination test.

Zoonotic bacteria

The three most commonly reported zoonoses in the EU are the foodborne enteric diseases campylobacteriosis, salmonellosis, and yersiniosis (4). Most cases of campylobacteriosis are caused by Campylobacter jejuni, followed by Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari. Humans become infected by consuming contaminated meat, especially poultry meat, which is commonly contaminated by C. jejuni. Pigs, in particular growing pigs, are commonly colonised by Campylobacter spp., mostly by C. coli, but also by C. jejuni (5, 6). However, results from genotyping studies indicate that isolates from pigs differ genetically from human isolates to a larger extent than poultry isolates (7). There are just a few studies on the subject of rodents as a risk of transmission of campylobacter, but one study concluded that occurrence of rodents was one of the risk factors for high Campylobacter prevalence in broiler chicken flocks (8), and a similar tendency, although not significant, was described by in another study (9). Mice experimentally infected with C. jejuni become colonised and excrete bacteria for several weeks (10). One study found that isolates from pig manure and rodents on organic pig farms differed genetically (11), but these isolates originated from different farms, so the results may simply reflect biodiversity within the species. Non-typhoidal salmonellosis is the second most reported zoonosis, and also the most frequently reported cause of food-borne outbreaks within the EU (4). The majority of cases worldwide are caused by Salmonella serovar Enteritidis, of which the most important sources are eggs and poultry meat (4, 12). The second most common, and in North America the most common serovar, is Salmonella Typhimurium, which is usually derived from pig, poultry, or bovine meat (4). Infected pigs are usually subclinical carriers of zoonotic Salmonella, although some serovars cause disease in the pig (13). The source of infection of Salmonella to poultry or other farm animals, except for the introduction of infected animals, can be anything from a broad range of wild animals including birds and rodents, to cats, feed, and the environment. Salmonella persists for years in suitable conditions, surviving both freezing and dryness (13). Davies and Wray (14) showed that Salmonella Enteritidis could be cultured from a large proportion (19–86%) of mice on infected layer and broiler farms, and that droppings from infected mice were infective for pullets up to 2 months after inoculation. Liebana et al. (15) further emphasised mice as the most common finding in their study of vast numbers of environmental and vector samples on S. Enteritidis-contaminated farms. Henzler and Opitz (16) found that mice amplify the bioconcentration of S. Enteritidis, resulting in an isolation rate three times higher than from the environment. Mouse population density has also been shown to be an important factor for the transmission of Salmonella between chicken and mouse. In a study from Denmark, a strong correlation was indicated between Salmonella in production animals and wildlife, including rodents. However, wildlife animals tested positive only during periods when Salmonella was detected in production animals, indicating the production animals as the source of infection (17). Similarly, two other studies showed that low prevalence of Salmonella in mice on farms coincided with negative farm animals (11, 18). Yersiniosis is the third most frequently reported zoonosis in Europe, with the majority of human cases caused by Yersinia (Y). enterocolitica bioserotype 4/O:3 (19), with occasional outbreaks especially in the northern hemisphere caused by Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (20, 21). The reservoir of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica is the domestic pig (22). One study found Y. enterocolitica in about 8% of wild rodents in Scandinavia, but no human pathogenic biotypes (23). House mice on farms are colonised mainly by Y. enterocolitica serogroup 1A (18), but serotype O:3 has been isolated from black rats (Rattus rattus) in pig houses (24), and serotype 4/O:3 from brown rats in a slaughterhouse (25) and brown rats and house mice in pig houses, of similar genotypes as pig isolates from the same farms (26). Yersinia pseudotuberculosis appears to circulate between animals and the environment in wild birds (27), various free-living mammals such as deer, hare, marten, and racoon dog (28) and water (29), but has also been isolated from domestic pigs (30, 31) and from wild boars (32). In Finland, recent outbreaks of Y. pseudotuberculosis were traced to carrots and iceberg lettuce stored in such a way that they were accessible to rodents and other wildlife. The same authors identified pest animals as a risk factor for high prevalence of Y. pseudotuberculosis on pig farms (20, 21, 33). Furthermore, Y. pseudotuberculosis has been found in mice, moles, and barn rats (34, 35). Identical restriction endonuclease patterns were found in isolates from rat and a patient within the same area in Japan where transmission through rodent-contaminated water was suspected (29). Rats were also strongly suspected of being the source of infection in a breeding monkey outdoor facility (36). Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease of worldwide distribution which causes subclinical to severe cases of icteric leptospirosis with renal failure, often called Weil's disease (37). Animals of different species, including rodents, act as maintenance hosts for different serovars of Leptospira (38). Several studies show that wild rodents are common carriers of leptospires, including feral rodents (39), rodents on farms (40), and rodent pets (41). A high proportion of sewer rats in Copenhagen were recently found to be infected with serovars Pomona, Sejroe, and Icterhaemorrhagiae (42). In the Netherlands, black rats on pig farms were found to be carriers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) of a multilocus sequence type 38 strain that has emerged as a cause of hospital-acquired infections (43).

Zoonotic parasites

The parasite Toxoplasma gondii is a coccidium that infects all warm-blooded animals which act as intermediate hosts (44), whereas definitive hosts are cats of various species (45). In humans, infection during pregnancy can cause abortion or congenital toxoplasmosis in the foetus, with subsequent central nervous system (CNS) and ocular lesions (46). The sources of infection to humans are soil exposure (47), eating undercooked meat, especially pork (44), and cleaning cat litter boxes (48), while rodents are believed to be an important source of T. gondii infection to cats (49). Rodents also seem to play a role in the transmission of T. gondii to pigs: a correlation between T. gondii seroprevalence in pigs and seropositive rodents has been shown in several studies (50, 51). Prevalence studies show somewhat different results depending on methods used. Various serological methods have been used (52, 53), but also polymerase chain reaction (PCR) applied directly on brain tissue, which generally results in higher prevalences (54, 55). Murphy et al. (81) used both PCR and serology simultaneously in mice and found a PCR detection rate of 59%, whereas the detection rate by serology was only 1.0%. Thus, low sensitivity for serological methods detecting T. gondii could be the explanation for the low prevalence of toxoplasmosis previously reported in rodents (56, 57). The eight recognised species of the nematode Trichinella are all pathogenic to humans, causing intestinal and muscular disease of varying severity (58). The most important species associated with human disease is T. richinella spiralis, which is most adapted to domestic and wild pigs (58), whereas other species have wild carnivores as main and intermediate hosts. In Europe, T. richinella britova has become more widespread due to its occurrence in sylvatic carnivores, whereas T. spiralis dominates in domestic pigs and wild boars (59). In Romania, for example, trichinellosis is a serious health problem, with an annual incidence of 6.2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants between 1990 and 2007 (60). Rats can be infected by Trichinella, but their importance in spreading the disease is unclear. Leiby et al. (22) found that a population of rats scavenging on infected dead pigs remained infected during a 25-month period after the infected pigs were removed. Stojcevic et al. (61), on the other hand, detected infected rats only on pig farms with positive pigs in an area with endemic infection of T. spiralis and concluded that the cause of infection in rats is improper slaughter procedures, which result in the spread of infected pork scraps in the environment. The parasitic gastrointestinal infections cryptosporidiosis and giardiosis are common and have worldwide distributions. For both of these infections, outbreaks can often be traced to water or to food, and the infectious dose is small (62, 63). To date, there are 19 known species of the protozoan Cryptosporidium (64), of which two, Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum, can cause diarrhoea in humans. C. hominis is restricted to humans, whereas C. parvum is zoonotic. Before the development of molecular biology methods for genotyping isolates of Cryptosporidium, wild animals including rodents were considered carriers of zoonotic Cryptosporidium (65, 66), leading to an overestimation of their zoonotic importance. More recent studies show that most of the Cryptosporidium oocysts detected in rodents belong to other species or genotypes than C. parvum, for instance mouse genotype I, which is host-adapted to rodents, and Cryptosporidium muris (67), which in rare cases has been isolated from human patients (68, 69). Giardia intestinalis (syn. duodenalis, lamblia) has been described as the most common intestinal parasite in humans and livestock (70). Similarly, with the use of molecular methods, Giardia, an intestinal flagellate, has been divided into assemblages A–G, each of which has distinct host spectra. Assemblages A and B are zoonotic genotypes, C and D are dog genotypes, E livestock, F cat, and G are rat genotypes (71). Other Giardia species that have been isolated from rodents are Giardia muris and Giardia microti, species which are not zoonotic (72).

Zoonotic virus

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) belongs to the family Hepeviridae and includes four genotypes with the ability to infect humans and other animals. Besides genotypes 1 and 2, which are restricted to humans, genotypes 3 and 4 have been detected in both humans and pigs (73). Several studies have shown that occupational pig exposure is a factor for HEV infection (74), which suggests animal-human transmission of the virus. In the search for other potential reservoir animals for hepatitis E, Kabrane-Lazizi et al., 1999 found that between 44 and 90% of rats tested positive by ELISA (75). However, sequence and phylogenetic analyses of rat HEV indicate that these constitute a completely different genotype of unknown pathogenicity to humans (76).

Rodents as carriers of animal pathogens

Only a few studies have been published on rodent transmission of specific animal pathogens in pig and chicken herds, but some of the agents discussed previously as zoonoses can also affect the health of pigs, e.g. Toxoplasma gondii, Leptospira, and Campylobacter spp. and some serovars of Salmonella.

Bacteria

The genus Brachyspira constitutes bacteria that are found in the intestines of many species of mammals and birds. Brachyspira hyodysenteriae is the aetiological agent of swine dysentery (SD) (77), a pig disease that causes severe mucohaemorrhagic diarrhoea. All age groups of pigs except for newborns can be affected (78). Brachyspira pilosicoli causes a milder colitis referred to as porcine colonic spirochaetosis (PCS) (79). Weaners and growers are affected with watery diarrhoea or porridge-like faeces, sometimes with mucus, resulting in reduced growth rate. In chicken, Brachyspira spp. colonisation, referred to as avian intestinal spirochaetosis (AIS), is associated with egg production losses and signs of disease. Intestinal spiral-shaped bacteria have been observed microscopically in both laboratory and wild-caught rodents, of which some showed the morphological characteristics of Brachyspira spp. (80). Isolates designated as Brachyspira hyodysenteriae have been detected in both wild and laboratory rodents (81, 82). Experimentally, B. hyodysenteriae has been shown to effectively spread between laboratory mice and pigs (83). Porcine genotypes of B. hyodysenteriae have been isolated from rats and mice caught in pig herds (84, 85) and porcine genotypes of B. pilosicoli in mice (84, 86). The intracellular bacterium Lawsonia intracellularis is the cause of porcine proliferative enteropathy (PPE) (87), a very common intestinal disease with large economic impact in growing pigs (5, 88). The clinical appearance is similar to that of colonic spirochaetosis, with diarrhoea and retarded growth. L. intracellularis has been detected in a number of animal species other than the pig, i.e. hamster, deer, ostrich, ferret, horse, and rabbit (89–91). Rodents have been implicated as possible reservoirs for the bacteria (92), and a recent study showed that infected rats shed large numbers of bacteria in their faeces for up to 3 weeks (93).

Virus

Encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) is a cardiovirus of the Picornaviridae that in growing pigs causes acute myocarditis and sudden deaths (94, 95). In sows, it causes reproductive problems with abortions and dead and weak piglets (96, 97). Outbreaks occur mainly in clusters in certain areas, which in Europe have been located in Belgium, Italy, Greece, and Cyprus (98). The epidemiology is inconclusive, but wild rodents are considered a natural reservoir for EMCV (99), from which the virus is shed in faeces (100, 101). In a few cases, EMCV has been suspected of causing disease in humans (102) and seroprevalence has been found to be high in veterinarians, farmers, abattoir workers and especially hunters (103). Porcine respiratory syndrome (PRRS), a highly contagious syndrome with reproductive failure and pneumonia in growing pigs, has spread worldwide and often remains as an endemic infection in herds (104). Several non-porcine reservoirs for this arterivirus have been suspected, but attempts at virus isolation from rodents caught on infected pig farms have failed, and transmission experiments to laboratory rodents have shown that rodents are not susceptible to the virus (105).

Conclusions and perspectives

The literature shows that wild rodents carry pathogens that can be transmitted to production animals on farms and thereby constitute an important factor in the epidemiology of these pathogens. In general, rodents are not true reservoirs of the pathogens reviewed here, but could act as transmitters of disease within a facility or in some cases between farms. In addition, rodents on farms can be a link between wild fauna and domestic animals used for consumption, and in the case of intensively reared animals kept indoors, rodents pose a danger of introducing new infections into herds. The conclusion is that rodent control should be considered an important measure to provide good bio-security on farms. Considering that climate change can be suspected to promote rodent populations in the temperate zone, in the future the problem is likely to become more difficult to combat. The use of rodent-proof buildings will thus be important when planning new facilities for production animals.
  99 in total

1.  Finding of Yersinia enterocolitica in Rattus rattus.

Authors:  V Pokorná; E Aldová
Journal:  J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1977

2.  Epidemiological investigation of risk factors for campylobacter colonization in Norwegian broiler flocks.

Authors:  G Kapperud; E Skjerve; L Vik; K Hauge; A Lysaker; I Aalmen; S M Ostroff; M Potter
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.451

3.  Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnancy. Results of a prospective case-control study in Norway.

Authors:  G Kapperud; P A Jenum; B Stray-Pedersen; K K Melby; A Eskild; J Eng
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Yersinia pseudotuberculosis with limited genetic diversity is a common finding in tonsils of fattening pigs.

Authors:  Taina Niskanen; Maria Fredriksson-Ahomaa; Hannu Korkeala
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.077

5.  Lawsonia intracellularis in rodents from pig farms with the occurrence of porcine proliferative enteropathy.

Authors:  M Friedman; V Bednár; J Klimes; J Smola; V Mrlík; I Literák
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.858

6.  Occurrence of Yersinia enterocolitica in house rats.

Authors:  K I Kaneko; S Hamada; Y Kasai; E Kato
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Transmission and pathogenicity of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) among rats.

Authors:  Vassiliki Spyrou; Huibert Maurice; Charalambos Billinis; Maria Papanastassopoulou; Dimitra Psalla; Mirjam Nielen; Frank Koenen; Orestis Papadopoulos
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Virulence of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis isolated from pork and from the throats of swine.

Authors:  K Shiozawa; M Hayashi; M Akiyama; T Nishina; S Nakatsugawa; H Fukushima; Y Asakawa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection contracted through water contaminated by a wild animal.

Authors:  H Fukushima; M Gomyoda; K Shiozawa; S Kaneko; M Tsubokura
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium.

Authors:  Ronald Fayer
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.011

View more
  18 in total

1.  Isolation and characterization of Salmonella enterica in day-old ducklings in Egypt.

Authors:  Kamelia M Osman; Sherif H Marouf; Tara R Zolnikov; Nayerah AlAtfeehy
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium difficile in wild Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) from Ontario swine farms.

Authors:  Jamie L Rothenburger; Joyce D Rousseau; J Scott Weese; Claire M Jardine
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.310

3.  Detection of the Emerging Picornavirus Senecavirus A in Pigs, Mice, and Houseflies.

Authors:  Lok R Joshi; Kristin A Mohr; Travis Clement; Kyle S Hain; Bryan Myers; Joseph Yaros; Eric A Nelson; Jane Christopher-Hennings; Danielle Gava; Rejane Schaefer; Luizinho Caron; Scott Dee; Diego G Diel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Discovery of Novel Alphacoronaviruses in European Rodents and Shrews.

Authors:  Theocharis Tsoleridis; Okechukwu Onianwa; Emma Horncastle; Emma Dayman; Miaoran Zhu; Taechasit Danjittrong; Marta Wachtl; Jerzy M Behnke; Sarah Chapman; Victoria Strong; Phillipa Dobbs; Jonathan K Ball; Rachael E Tarlinton; C Patrick McClure
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  A Detailed Protocol to Enable Safe-Handling, Preemptive Detection, and Systematic Surveillance of Rat-Vectored Pathogens in the Urban Environment.

Authors:  Michael H Parsons; Ronald J Sarno; Michael A Deutsch
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-07-14

6.  A 10-day vacancy period after cleaning and disinfection has no effect on the bacterial load in pig nursery units.

Authors:  K Luyckx; S Millet; S Van Weyenberg; L Herman; M Heyndrickx; J Dewulf; K De Reu
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Increasing incidence of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome could be associated with livestock husbandry in Changchun, northeastern China.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Dan-Dan Wang; Xin-Lou Li; Sake J de Vlas; Ya-Qin Yu; Jian Zhu; Ying Zhang; Bo Wang; Li Yan; Li-Qun Fang; Ya-Wen Liu; Wu-Chun Cao
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Expert Opinion on the Perceived Effectiveness and Importance of On-Farm Biosecurity Measures for Cattle and Swine Farms in Switzerland.

Authors:  Karin Kuster; Marie-Eve Cousin; Thomas Jemmi; Gertraud Schüpbach-Regula; Ioannis Magouras
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mapping the epidemic changes and risks of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Shaanxi Province, China, 2005-2016.

Authors:  Weifeng Liang; Xu Gu; Xue Li; Kangjun Zhang; Kejian Wu; Miaomiao Pang; Jianhua Dong; Hunter R Merrill; Tao Hu; Kun Liu; Zhongjun Shao; Hong Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prevalence of Leptospira spp. and Seoul hantavirus in brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) in four regions in the Netherlands, 2011-2015.

Authors:  Miriam Maas; Ankje De Vries; Chantal Reusken; Jan Buijs; Marga Goris; Rudy Hartskeerl; Ahmed Ahmed; Peter Van Tulden; Arno Swart; Roan Pijnacker; Miriam Koene; Åke Lundkvist; Paul Heyman; Barry Rockx; Joke Van Der Giessen
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.