| Literature DB >> 16398337 |
M Fossil1, K Ahlsten, T Pohjanvirta, M Anttila, T Kokkonen, T K Jensen, M Boye, A Sukura, K Pelkola, S Pelkonen.
Abstract
A hippurate-negative biovariant of Brachyspira pilosicoli (B. pilosicolihipp-) is occasionally isolated in diarrhoeic pigs in Finland, often concomitantly with hippurate-positive B. pilosicoli or Lawsonia intracellularis. We studied pathogenicity of B. pilosicolihipp- with special attention paid to avoiding co-infection with other enteric pathogens. Pigs were weaned and moved to barrier facilities at the age of 11 days. At 46 days, 8 pigs were inoculated with B. pilosicolihipp- strain Br1622, 8 pigs were inoculated with B. pilosicoli type strain P43/6/78 and 7 pigs were sham-inoculated. No signs of spirochaetal diarrhoea were detected; only one pig, inoculated with P43/6/78, had soft faeces from day 9 to 10 post inoculation. The pigs were necropsied between days 7 and 23 after inoculation. Live pigs were culture-negative for Brachyspira spp., but B. pilosicolihipp- was reisolated from necropsy samples of two pigs. The lesions on large colons were minor and did not significantly differ between the three trial groups. In silver-stained sections, invasive spirochaetes were detected in colonic mucosae of several pigs in all groups. Fluorescent in situ hybridisation for genus Brachyspira, B. pilosicoli and strain Br1622 was negative. However, in situ detection for members of the genus Leptospira was positive for spirochaete-like bacteria in the colonic epithelium of several pigs in both infected groups as well as in the control group. L. intracellularis, Salmonella spp., Yersinia spp. and intestinal parasites were not detected. The failure of B. pilosicoli strains to cause diarrhoea is discussed with respect to infectivity of the challenge strains, absence of certain intestinal pathogens and feed and management factors.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16398337 PMCID: PMC1618965 DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-46-257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Vet Scand ISSN: 0044-605X Impact factor: 1.695
Names, sequences and specificities of rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes used.
| Probe | Systematic name1 | Sequence (5'-3') | Specificity |
| Eub3382 | S-D-Bact-0338-a-A-18 | GCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGT | Domain bacteria |
| NON-Eub3382 | S-*-non-0338-a-S-18 | CGACGGAGGGCATCCTCA | Unspecific control probe |
| SER14103 | L-G-Brachy-1410-a-A-19 | GTCATTCCATCGAAACATA | Genus |
| Pilosi2093 | S-S-B.pilo-0209-a-A-18 | GCTCATCGTGAAGCGAAA | |
| Br1622 | S-S-Br1622-0637-a-A-18 | CCAAGATCTACAGTATCC | Br1622 |
| Treponema | S-G-Trepon-0728-a-A-18 | TCGGCCAGAAACCCGCCT | |
| Borrelia | S-G-Borre-0688-a-A-18 | TATCAACAGATTCCACCC | |
| Leptospira | S-G-Leptospi-1414-a-A-18 | CGGGTGCTCCCCACTCAG |
1 According to the Oligonucleotide Probe Database (OPD) nomenclature [1].
2 [2].
3 [3].
Pigs inoculated with B. pilosicolihipp- strain Br1622, B. pilosicoli type strain P43/6/78 or sterile broth (control). Pathology and results from fluorescent in situ hybridisation are shown.
| Pig No. | Inoculum | Necropsy day post-inoculation | Gross pathology1 | Histology | FISH4 | ||
| Histopathology2 | Spiral-shaped bacteria3 | 1 | 2 | ||||
| 1 | Br1622 | 7 | - | + | - | + | - |
| 2 | Br1622 | 9 | - | (+) | + | - | - |
| 3 | Br1622 | 11 | + | + | ++ | + | - |
| 4 | Br1622 | 15 | ++ | + | ++, s | + | - |
| 5 | Br1622 | 16 | ++ | (+) | -, s | + | - |
| 6 | Br1622 | 17 | + | + | ++ | + | - |
| 7 | Br1622 | 21 | + | (+) | ++ | - | - |
| 8 | Br1622 | 23 | ++ | + | - | - | - |
| 9 | P43/6/78 | 7 | + | (+) | + | - | - |
| 10 | P43/6/78 | 9 | - | (+) | - | + | - |
| 11 | P43/6/78 | 11 | + | (+) | + | - | - |
| 12 | P43/6/78 | 15 | ++ | (+) | ++ | - | - |
| 13 | P43/6/78 | 16 | ++ | (+) | ++ | + | - |
| 14 | P43/6/78 | 17 | + | + | + | - | - |
| 15 | P43/6/78 | 21 | + | (+) | ++ | + | - |
| 16 | P43/6/78 | 23 | ++ | (+) | - | - | - |
| 17 | control | 7 | - | (+) | - | - | - |
| 18 | control | 15 | + | + | - | + | - |
| 19 | control | 17 | - | (+) | ++ | + | - |
| 20 | control | 23 | + | + | - | - | - |
| 21 | control | 9 | + | (+) | - | - | - |
| 22 | control | 11 | - | (+) | - | - | - |
| 23 | control | 21 | + | (+) | ++ | + | - |
1Gross findings in caecum and/or colon. - = normal; + = mucosa slightly hyperaemic; ++ = mucosa hyperaemic and slightly oedematous.
2(+) = diffuse lymphocytic and plasmacytic infiltration in lamina propria, and multifocal accumulation of phagocytic macrophages beneath the epithelial cells of the caecum and/or colon; + = in addition, occasional microabscesses in crypts and/or mild exocytosis of neutrophils.
3Spiral-shaped bacteria in caecum and/or colon in silver-stained sections. - = none; + = very rare or irregularly observed in crypts and/or near tips of villi; ++ = invading through epithelial lining into lamina propria and/or abundantly in crypts; s = Br1622 reisolated from necropsy samples.
4Fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Positive (+) and negative (-) results with probes designed for 1 = domain bacteria and genus Leptospira, and 2 = genus Brachyspira, species B. pilosicoli and strain Br1622.
Figure 1Invasion of spirochaetes in and below the colonic epithelium is shown in pig no. 13, which was inoculated with B. pilosicoli P43/6/78 and necropsied 16 days post-inoculation. Warthin-Starry silver staining. 1000×.
Figure 2Invasive spirochaetes in a colonic crypt. Same pig as in Fig. 1. Warthin-Starry silver staining. 1000×.
Figure 3Fluorescent in situ hybridisation with a genus-specific probe Leptospira. Demonstration of spirochaetes infiltrating the colonic epithelium. Pig no. 3 inoculated with B. pilosicolihipp- strain Br1622 and necropsied 11 days post-inoculation. 1000×.