Literature DB >> 12588506

The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.

M A Abdullah1, Y F Talic.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the tensile bond strengths of two impression material systems (polysulphide and polyvinyl siloxane) to two custom tray materials [autopolymerizing and visible light-cured (VLC) acrylic resin]. The effect of polymerizing the tray materials directly against wax spacer and tin foil was evaluated for each material. Polymerizing tray materials against tin foil significantly increased the bond strengths of polysulphide and polyvinyl siloxane impression materials to VLC and autopolymerizing acrylic resin tray materials. Polyvinyl siloxane VLC cured against tin foil combination produced the strongest bond. The VLC resin tray material generated greater bond strength than autopolymerizing acrylic resin when polymerized against tin foil.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12588506     DOI： 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01023.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN： 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  6 in total

1.  An in vitro study of the bond strength of five adhesives used for vinyl polysiloxane impression materials and tray materials.

Authors:  Surender Kumar; Udey Vir Gandhi; Saurav Banerjee
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-01-06

2.  The bond strength of different tray adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane to two tray materials: an in vitro study.

Authors:  B L Ashwini; S Manjunath; K Xavier Mathew
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-10-07

3.  A Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of the Dies Affected by Tray Type, Material Viscosity, and Pouring Sequence of Dual and Single Arch Impressions- An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Poonam R Kulkarni; Rahul S Kulkarni; Rupal J Shah; Rahul Chhajlani; Bhuwan Saklecha; Kavita Maru
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

4.  Need for a reliable alternative to custom-made Implant Impression trays: An in vitro study comparing accuracy of custom trays versus specialized aluminum stock tray.

Authors:  Mukti Goel; Pankaj Dhawan; Piyush Tandan; Pankaj Madhukar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

5.  Effect of variation of impression material combinations, dual arch tray types, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of working dies: "An in vitro study".

Authors:  Nagam Raja Reddy; Jakranpally Sathya Reddy; Bramha Josyula Indira Padmaja; Budigi Madan Mohan Reddy; Motupalli Sunil; Bommireddy Tejeswar Reddy
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

6.  Compatibility of a Silicone Impression/Adhesive System to FDM-Printed Tray Materials-A Laboratory Peel-off Study.

Authors:  Yichen Xu; Alexey Unkovskiy; Felix Klaue; Frank Rupp; Juergen Geis-Gerstorfer; Sebastian Spintzyk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 3.623
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.