Literature DB >> 24604995

The bond strength of different tray adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane to two tray materials: an in vitro study.

B L Ashwini1, S Manjunath2, K Xavier Mathew1.   

Abstract

There has been no established chemical bonding between custom tray resin and the elastomeric impression materials without the use of manufacturer's recommended specific tray adhesive. The present study was aimed to compare the bond strength of the manufacturer recommended tray adhesives with the universal tray adhesives using the medium body consistency vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) material and custom tray made of autopolymerising resin and visible light cure (VLC) resin. A total 90 cubicle specimens of autopolymerising resin and 90 specimens of VLC resin were tested for its tensile bond strength. Effectiveness of universal tray adhesive was compared with manufactured tray adhesive. Each of these specimens was then subjected to tensile load in hounsefield universal testing machine at a cross head speed of 5 mm/min and the results were compared and evaluated using one way analysis of variance and post hoc Tuckey's test. Analysis of bond strength revealed that the universal tray adhesive showed better strength and was statiscally significant when compared to the manufacture supplied tray adhesive. Comparison between both the groups, VLC resin showed better bond strength as compared to autopolymerizing resin. Universal tray adhesive had better tensile bond strength than the manufacturers recommended tray adhesive with the medium body viscosity VPS impression material for both autopolymerising and VLC tray resin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autopolymerising tray resin; Elastomeric impression material; Tensile bond strength; Tray adhesive; Universal adhesive; VLC resin tray material

Year:  2012        PMID: 24604995      PMCID: PMC3935054          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0184-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  12 in total

Review 1.  A review of contemporary impression materials and techniques.

Authors:  Terry E Donovan; Winston W L Chee
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04

2.  Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.

Authors:  J A Payne; B P Pereira
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Tensile and peel bond strengths of tray adhesives.

Authors:  B E Grant; A H Tjan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Comparing effects of tray treatment on the accuracy of dies.

Authors:  A H Tjan; S B Whang
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Strength of tray adhesives for elastomeric impression materials.

Authors:  J W Nicholson; K H Porter; T Dolan
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.440

6.  The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.

Authors:  M A Abdullah; Y F Talic
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.

Authors:  A Peregrina; M F Land; C Wandling; W M Johnston
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Tensile strength of elastomeric impression materials, adhesive and cohesive bonding.

Authors:  D R Cullen; J L Sandrik
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Accuracy of addition silicones as a function of technique.

Authors:  G H Johnson; R G Craig
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 10.  Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques.

Authors:  W W Chee; T E Donovan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  1 in total

1.  Compatibility of a Silicone Impression/Adhesive System to FDM-Printed Tray Materials-A Laboratory Peel-off Study.

Authors:  Yichen Xu; Alexey Unkovskiy; Felix Klaue; Frank Rupp; Juergen Geis-Gerstorfer; Sebastian Spintzyk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 3.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.