Literature DB >> 24604999

An in vitro study of the bond strength of five adhesives used for vinyl polysiloxane impression materials and tray materials.

Surender Kumar1, Udey Vir Gandhi2, Saurav Banerjee3.   

Abstract

Although stock trays often provide mechanical retention for elastomeric impression materials, manufacturers typically recommend the use of an adhesive, whether a stock or custom tray is used. The mention of the bond strength on the adhesive packaging is not available, therefore the clinician has no idea whatsoever of the ideal adhesive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of three vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) materials, one with a poly(methyl methacrylate) autopolymerizing (PMMA) specimen and another with a light-polymerizing tray material (VLC), using the adhesive recommended by the manufacturer of the impression material, and two universal adhesives. A total of ninety specimens (15 × 15 × 20 mm) were used, 45 specimens were made in PMMA and rest 45 was made in VLC. Five paint-on adhesives (Coltene, Caulk, 3M, universal Zhermack and universal GC) were applied. Three impression materials, Affinis, Reprosil, and 3M, were mixed and injected into a perforated poly vinyl chloride cylinder. Tray specimens were positioned against the open cylinder end in contact with the VPS material. Tensile strength tests were conducted until adhesive separation failure. Mean values and standard errors of the adhesive strength were recorded in MPa for each material combination. GC paint-on universal adhesive provided significantly higher adhesive strength values.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GC adhesive; Tensile bond strength; VPS

Year:  2013        PMID: 24604999      PMCID: PMC3935036          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0243-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  24 in total

1.  The bond strength of elastomer tray adhesives to thermoplastic and acrylic resin tray materials.

Authors:  W R Hogans; J R Agar
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.

Authors:  J A Payne; B P Pereira
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  The teaching of all-ceramic restorations in North American dental schools: materials and techniques employed.

Authors:  K B Frazier; I A Mjör
Journal:  J Esthet Dent       Date:  1997

4.  The relative effectiveness of adhesives for polysulphide impression materials.

Authors:  A H Ellam; D C Smith
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1966-02-01       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  Comparing effects of tray treatment on the accuracy of dies.

Authors:  A H Tjan; S B Whang
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.

Authors:  D L Dixon; L C Breeding; M J Bosser; A J Nafso
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Strength of tray adhesives for elastomeric impression materials.

Authors:  J W Nicholson; K H Porter; T Dolan
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.440

8.  Tensile and bond strength of putty-wash elastomeric impression materials.

Authors:  J L Sandrik; J L Vacco
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  The effect of different adhesives on vinyl polysiloxane bond strength to two tray materials.

Authors:  A Peregrina; M F Land; C Wandling; W M Johnston
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Peel bond strengths of five impression material tray adhesives.

Authors:  R MacSween; R B Price
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  1 in total

1.  Compatibility of a Silicone Impression/Adhesive System to FDM-Printed Tray Materials-A Laboratory Peel-off Study.

Authors:  Yichen Xu; Alexey Unkovskiy; Felix Klaue; Frank Rupp; Juergen Geis-Gerstorfer; Sebastian Spintzyk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 3.623

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.