Literature DB >> 12588200

Colon polyp recurrence in a managed care population.

Marianne Ulcickas Yood1, Susan Oliveria, J Gregory Boyer, Karen Wells, Paul Stang, Christine Cole Johnson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detection, treatment, and subsequent screening of patients with colorectal polyps have considerable implications for public health. Understanding the natural history of colorectal polyps from biologic and health care services standpoints is critical in determining optimal treatment.
METHODS: Using computerized data from a large Midwestern health maintenance organization, we identified patients 50 years or older who underwent a polypectomy (index polypectomy) between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1999. We followed up patients to identify subsequent polypectomies through September 1, 2001.
RESULTS: Our final study sample consisted of 8865 individuals with an index polypectomy. Overall, 2704 patients (30.5%) were diagnosed as having recurrent polyps. Kaplan-Meier projections estimate that 50% of patients will have a recurrence within 7.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.2-8.1 years). Among patients who underwent colon screening at least 9 months after the index polypectomy (52% of original cohort), Kaplan-Meier projections estimate that 50% will have a recurrent polyp within 3.9 years (95% CI, 3.8-4.1 years).
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that, even when screening and treatment are received by those who need it, the risk of colon polyp recurrence is high and many patients do not undergo additional screening. Efforts to increase and monitor ongoing screening of postpolypectomy patients are warranted. In addition, further research is needed to better identify patients at risk for recurrence so that continued screening and other interventions can be targeted at these groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12588200     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.4.422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  9 in total

1.  Recurrence with malignancy after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps with high-grade dysplasia: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Neal Mehta; Ashraf Abushahin; Meena Sadaps; Mohammad Alomari; John Vargo; Deepa Patil; Rocio Lopez; Matthew Kalady; Conor P Delaney; Emre Gorgun; James Church; Yutaka Saito; Carol A Burke; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  CT colonography: role in FOBT-based screening programs for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Grazia Grazzini; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-26

3.  Clinicopathological features of colon polyps from African-Americans.

Authors:  Mehdi Nouraie; Fatemeh Hosseinkhah; Hassan Brim; Behrouz Zamanifekri; Duane T Smoot; Hassan Ashktorab
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Cardiovascular outcomes in women with advanced breast cancer exposed to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Karen E Wells; Sharon Hensley Alford; Heather Dakki; Annette B Beiderbeck; Arti Hurria; Cary P Gross; Susan A Oliveria
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Reena V Chokshi; Christine E Hovis; Graham A Colditz; Dayna S Early; Jean S Wang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The impact of fair colonoscopy preparation on colonoscopy use and adenoma miss rates in patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; H Myra Kim; Eric E Elliott; Jennifer L Mickevicius; Brittany B Graustein; Philip S Schoenfeld
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Factors predictive of high-risk adenomas at the third colonoscopy after initial adenoma removal.

Authors:  Sook Hee Chung; Soo Jung Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Mi Sung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  GPNMB methylation: a new marker of potentially carcinogenic colon lesions.

Authors:  Hassan Ashktorab; Hamed Rahi; Mehdi Nouraie; Babak Shokrani; Edward Lee; Tahmineh Haydari; Adeyinka O Laiyemo; Peter Siegel; Hassan Brim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening--review of literature.

Authors:  Sri Rapuri; Jeanne Spencer; Dennis Eckels
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.