Literature DB >> 35064004

Selective Interruption of Auditory Interhemispheric Cross Talk Impairs Discrimination Learning of Frequency-Modulated Tone Direction But Not Gap Detection and Discrimination.

Katja Saldeitis1,2,3, Marcus Jeschke1,2,3, Annika Michalek4, Julia U Henschke5, Wolfram Wetzel1, Frank W Ohl1,6,7, Eike Budinger8,7.   

Abstract

Functional hemispheric lateralization is a basic principle of brain organization. In the auditory domain, the right auditory cortex (AC) determines the pitch direction of continuous auditory stimuli whereas the left AC discriminates gaps in these stimuli. The involved functional interactions between the two sides, mediated by commissural connections, are poorly understood. Here, we selectively disrupted the interhemispheric cross talk from the left to the right primary AC and vice versa using chromophore-targeted laser-induced apoptosis of the respective projection neurons, which make up 6-17% of all AC neurons in Layers III, V, and VI. Following photolysis, male gerbils were trained in a first experimental set to discriminate between rising and falling frequency-modulated (FM) tone sweeps. The acquisition of the task was significantly delayed in lesioned animals of either lesion direction. However, the final discrimination performance and hit rate was lowest for animals with left-side lesioned commissural neurons, demonstrating that also information from the left AC is relevant for FM direction learning. Photolysis after successful learning did not affect the retrieval of the learned task, indicating that the disruption during learning was not because of a general functional impairment. In a second experimental set, the gerbil's ability to detect and discriminate small silent gaps of varying length within FM sweeps was tested. This ability was also preserved after interhemispheric disruption. Taken together, interhemispheric communication between the left and right AC is important for the acquisition of FM tone direction learning but not for its retrieval and for gap detection and gap duration discrimination.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Hemispheric lateralization of neuronal functions such as speech and music processing in humans are common throughout the brain; however, the involved interhemispheric interactions are ill-defined. Here, we show that the selective photolytic disruption of auditory cortical commissural connections in rodents impairs the acquisition but not retrieval of a frequency-modulated tone direction discrimination task. The final discrimination performance and hit rate was lowest for animals with lesioned left-to-right-side projections; thus, although right auditory cortex is dominant, left auditory cortex is also relevant for learning this task. The detection and discrimination of small gaps within the tone sweeps remain intact, suggesting a pathway for the processing of these temporal structures, which could be independent from the lesioned interhemispheric cross talk.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mongolian gerbil; auditory cortex; chromophore-targeted photolysis; corpus callosum; hemispheric specialization; rodent

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35064004      PMCID: PMC8925647          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0216-21.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  101 in total

Review 1.  Prefrontal cortex regulates inhibition and excitation in distributed neural networks.

Authors:  R T Knight; W R Staines; D Swick; L L Chao
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

2.  Spectral and temporal processing in the human auditory cortex--revisited.

Authors:  Marc Schönwiesner; Rudolf Rübsamen; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  The cognitive auditory cortex: task-specificity of stimulus representations.

Authors:  Henning Scheich; André Brechmann; Michael Brosch; Eike Budinger; Frank W Ohl
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Differential representation of auditory categories between cell classes in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joji Tsunada; Jung H Lee; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Reinhard König; Cezary Sieluzycki; Constantinos Simserides; Peter Heil; Henning Scheich
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Callosal projections drive neuronal-specific responses in the mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  Crystal Rock; Alfonso Junior Apicella
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The corpus callosum and recovery of working memory after epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Karen Blackmon; Heath R Pardoe; William B Barr; Babak A Ardekani; Werner K Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Ruben Kuzniecky; Thomas Thesen
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  Distinct sensitivity to spectrotemporal modulation supports brain asymmetry for speech and melody.

Authors:  Benjamin Morillon; Robert J Zatorre; Philippe Albouy; Lucas Benjamin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  The neurotransmitters and postsynaptic actions of callosally projecting neurons.

Authors:  F Conti; T Manzoni
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1994-10-20       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Gap detection threshold in the rat before and after auditory cortex ablation.

Authors:  J Syka; N Rybalko; J Mazelová; R Druga
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.