Literature DB >> 12580262

Effect of broiler age, feed withdrawal, and transportation on levels of coliforms, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli and Salmonella on carcasses before and after immersion chilling.

J K Northcutt1, M E Berrang, J A Dickens, D L Fletcher, N A Cox.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine effects of bird age at slaughter, feed withdrawal, and transportation on levels of coliforms, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella on carcasses before and after immersion chilling. Broilers were processed at 42, 49, and 56 d of age after a 12-h feed withdrawal period or a 0-h feed withdrawal period (full fed). At each age, broilers were processed from two commercial farms previously identified as Campylobacter positive. One week before slaughter, broilers were gavaged with nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella. During bleeding, cotton plugs were inserted into the cloaca of each carcass. Whole-carcass rinses (WCR) were performed before and after immersion chilling with 20 ppm sodium hypochlorite, and rinses were analyzed for coliforms, Campylobacter, E. coli and Salmonella. Log10 counts for coliforms, Campylobacter, and E. coli were (P < 0.05) affected by bird age at slaughter. Feed withdrawal (FW) affected only Campylobacter on carcasses of older broilers (56 d of age). Chilling with sodium hypochlorite resulted in log10 reductions of 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 0.5 for coliforms, Campylobacter, E. coli, and Salmonella, respectively. Under the conditions of this experiment, it appears that contamination on the exterior of birds entering the processing facility is critical to carcass bacterial counts. Moreover, carcass bacterial counts did not vary when microbial counts of broilers were comparable. FW may increase prechill carcass counts for E. coli and Campylobacter, but it appears to have no effect on postchill carcass counts when sodium hypochlorite is used in the chilling operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12580262     DOI: 10.1093/ps/82.1.169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  9 in total

1.  Enumeration of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. in environmental farm samples and processing plant carcass rinses from commercial broiler chicken flocks.

Authors:  Roy D Berghaus; Stephan G Thayer; Bibiana F Law; Rita M Mild; Charles L Hofacre; Randall S Singer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of preslaughter events on prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in market-weight turkeys.

Authors:  Irene V Wesley; Wayne T Muraoka; Darrell W Trampel; H Scott Hurd
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effect of conventional and organic production practices on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. in poultry.

Authors:  Taradon Luangtongkum; Teresa Y Morishita; Aaron J Ison; Shouxiong Huang; Patrick F McDermott; Qijing Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Evaluation of a commercially available organic acid product on body weight loss, carcass yield, and meat quality during preslaughter feed withdrawal in broiler chickens: a poultry welfare and economic perspective.

Authors:  A Menconi; V A Kuttappan; X Hernandez-Velasco; T Urbano; F Matté; S Layton; G Kallapura; J Latorre; B E Morales; O Prado; J L Vicente; J Barton; R L Andreatti Filho; M Lovato; B M Hargis; G Tellez
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Enumeration of Escherichia coli cells on chicken carcasses as a potential measure of microbial process control in a random selection of slaughter establishments in the United States.

Authors:  Sean F Altekruse; Mark E Berrang; Harry Marks; Bharat Patel; William K Shaw; Parmesh Saini; Patricia A Bennett; J Stan Bailey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Influence of lauric acid on the susceptibility of chickens to an experimental Campylobacter jejuni colonisation.

Authors:  Julia Hankel; Johanna Popp; Diana Meemken; Katrin Zeiger; Martin Beyerbach; Venja Taube; Günter Klein; Christian Visscher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Reviewing Interventions against Enterobacteriaceae in Broiler Processing: Using Old Techniques for Meeting the New Challenges of ESBL E. coli?

Authors:  Michaela Projahn; Ewa Pacholewicz; Evelyne Becker; Guido Correia-Carreira; Niels Bandick; Annemarie Kaesbohrer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Survival and Control of Campylobacter in Poultry Production Environment.

Authors:  Mohammed J Hakeem; Xiaonan Lu
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  The incidence of Campylobacter contamination levels through Chicken-Sashimi Processing steps in A Small-scale Poultry processing plant applying the External stripping method.

Authors:  Vu Minh Duc; Rina Kakiuchi; Takeshi Obi; Hiroshi Asakura; Takehisa Chuma
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 1.267

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.