Literature DB >> 19363066

Enumeration of Escherichia coli cells on chicken carcasses as a potential measure of microbial process control in a random selection of slaughter establishments in the United States.

Sean F Altekruse1, Mark E Berrang, Harry Marks, Bharat Patel, William K Shaw, Parmesh Saini, Patricia A Bennett, J Stan Bailey.   

Abstract

To evaluate whether the number of Escherichia coli bacteria in carcass rinses from chicken slaughter establishments could be monitored for the purpose of microbial process control, we drew a random sample from 20 of 127 large USDA-inspected operations. In 2005, every 3 months, two sets of 10 carcass rinses, 100 ml each, were collected from establishments, netting 80 sample sets from the rehang and postchill stages. E. coli and Campylobacter numbers and Salmonella prevalence were measured. Mixed-effect models were used to estimate variance of mean log(10) E. coli cell numbers of 10-carcass rinse sample sets. Relationships between E. coli and Campylobacter and Salmonella were examined. For 10-carcass rinse sets, at both the rehang and postchill stages the mean log(10) E. coli CFU/ml fit the logistic distribution better than the normal distribution. The rehang overall mean log(10) E. coli was 3.3 CFU/ml, with a within-sample set standard deviation of 0.6 CFU/ml. The overall postchill mean log(10) E. coli was 0.8 CFU/ml, with 13 establishments having mean log(10) E. coli CFU/ml values of less than 1.0 and 7 having mean values of 1.2 or more. At the midpoint separating these establishments, a mean log(10) E. coli CFU/ml of 1.1, the within-sample set standard deviation was 0.5 CFU/ml, with smaller standard deviations as means increased. Postchill sample sets with mean log(10) E. coli counts less than or equal to 1.1 CFU/ml had lower overall prevalence of Salmonella and mean log(10) Campylobacter CFU/ml than sample sets with higher means. These findings regarding reductions in E. coli numbers provide insight relevant to microbial process control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19363066      PMCID: PMC2687290          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02685-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  12 in total

1.  Counts of Campylobacter spp. on U.S. broiler carcasses.

Authors:  Norman J Stern; Stephen Pretanik
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.077

2.  The effects on the microbiological condition of product of carcass dressing, cooling, and portioning processes at a poultry packing plant.

Authors:  C O Gill; L F Moza; M Badoni; S Barbut
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Validation of individual and multiple-sequential interventions for reduction of microbial populations during processing of poultry carcasses and parts.

Authors:  J D Stopforth; R O'Connor; M Lopes; B Kottapalli; W E Hill; M Samadpour
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.077

4.  Investigation of the concurrent colonization with Campylobacter and Salmonella in poultry flocks and assessment of the sampling site for status determination at slaughter.

Authors:  G Rasschaert; K Houf; J Van Hende; L De Zutter
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Prevalence and numbers of Campylobacter on broiler carcasses collected at rehang and postchill in 20 U.S. processing plants.

Authors:  M E Berrang; J S Bailey; S F Altekruse; B Patel; W K Shaw; R J Meinersmann; P J Fedorka-Cray
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.077

6.  Effects of postchill application of acidified sodium chlorite to control Campylobacter spp. and Escherichia coli on commercial broiler carcasses.

Authors:  Omar A Oyarzabal; Christopher Hawk; Sacit F Bilgili; C Cayce Warf; G Kere Kemp
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.077

7.  Effect of broiler age, feed withdrawal, and transportation on levels of coliforms, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli and Salmonella on carcasses before and after immersion chilling.

Authors:  J K Northcutt; M E Berrang; J A Dickens; D L Fletcher; N A Cox
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Hygiene indicator microorganisms for selected pathogens on beef, pork, and poultry meats in Belgium.

Authors:  Y Ghafir; B China; K Dierick; L De Zutter; G Daube
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.077

9.  The effect of airsacculitis on bird weights, uniformity, fecal contamination, processing errors, and populations of Campylobacter spp. and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S M Russell
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Assessment of post-Hurricane Katrina recovery in poultry slaughter establishments.

Authors:  D Smith; S F Altekruse; J S Bailey
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.077

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of Escherichia coli isolates from healthy chickens to determine their potential risk to poultry and human health.

Authors:  Zachary R Stromberg; James R Johnson; John M Fairbrother; Jacquelyn Kilbourne; Angelica Van Goor; Roy Curtiss; Melha Mellata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.