Literature DB >> 12579011

Magnetic resonance imaging of total knee arthroplasty.

Carolyn M Sofka1, Hollis G Potter, Mark Figgie, Richard Laskin.   

Abstract

Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty can be clinically difficult, and traditional imaging techniques such as conventional radiographs, arthrography, and bone scintigraphy are limited by poor contrast resolution and specificity. Traditional magnetic resonance imaging techniques often are nondiagnostic because of significant metal artifact. Forty-one patients (46 knees) had magnetic resonance imaging, tailored to reduce metallic susceptibility artifact, after total knee arthroplasty, and the findings and clinical and surgical followup were reviewed. All studies consistently showed the integrity of the periprosthetic soft tissues. Magnetic resonance imaging findings led to surgical or other therapeutic interventional procedures in 20 patients, and influenced clinical treatment in all patients. Optimized magnetic resonance imaging, in which the metallic artifact is diminished, is a clinically useful adjunct to traditional imaging techniques in evaluation of patients with painful total knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12579011     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000030516.43495.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  13 in total

1.  MR imaging of the knee in patients with medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: comparison among sequences at 1.5 T.

Authors:  A Aliprandi; F Perona; M Bandirali; P Randelli; P Cabitza; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 2.  MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; Brett Lurie; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  MRI after patellofemoral replacement: the component-bone interface and rotational alignment.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Jens Figiel; Ulrike Hähnlein; Nina Timmesfeld; Markus D Schofer; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Turgay Efe
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-06-26

Review 4.  Metal-induced artifacts in MRI.

Authors:  Brian A Hargreaves; Pauline W Worters; Kim Butts Pauly; John M Pauly; Kevin M Koch; Garry E Gold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Usefulness of slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) technique for reducing metal artifacts after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ahmed Jawhar; Miriam Reichert; Michael Kostrzewa; Mathias Nittka; Ulrike Attenberger; Henning Roehl; Frederic Bludau
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-10-11

Review 6.  Current applications of advanced cross-sectional imaging techniques in evaluating the painful arthroplasty.

Authors:  Carolyn M Sofka
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  MRI diagnosis of patellar clunk syndrome following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Le Roy Chong; Jack Davis; Steven B Haas; Mark P Figgie; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-01-24

8.  Musculoskeletal imaging update: current applications of advanced imaging techniques to evaluate the early and long-term complications of patients with orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Carolyn M Sofka; Hollis G Potter; Ronald S Adler; Helene Pavlov
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-02

9.  MRI Findings at the Bone-Component Interface in Symptomatic Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and the Relationship to Radiographic Findings.

Authors:  Laura Jill Kleeblad; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Alissa J Burge; Mark J Amirtharaj; Hollis G Potter; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-08-23

10.  Comparison of pain perception between open and minimally invasive surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Biagio Moretti; Elsa Vitale; Antonio Esposito; Antonio Colella; Maria Cassano; Angela Notarnicola
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2010-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.