Literature DB >> 9690883

Tailored outreach visits as a method for implementing guidelines and improving preventive care.

M E Hulscher1, B B van Drenth, H G Mokkink, E H van De Lisdonk, J C van Der Wouden, C van Weel, R P Grol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Authors of successful outreach visit studies stress the importance of tailoring the intervention to the unique attributes and needs of each practice. For a better understanding of the outreach visit method, the tailoring mechanism is explored in this article. The variation among practices in preventive outreach visits to implement guidelines and characteristics that determine the variation (baseline adherence to organizational guidelines, practice and visitor characteristics) are described. We explored whether and how many visits were paid to practices that showed no increase in adherence to guidelines. SETTING AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS: For 18 months, six trained nurse visitors assisted 33 family practices in implementing a set of guidelines to organize a program for cardiovascular disease prevention. MEASURES: Visit and consultative action parameters (number and duration of visits, duration of training and of conferring) and increase in adherence to organizational guidelines after 18 months of assistance compared to baseline adherence.
RESULTS: Practices differed considerably concerning the visit and consultative action parameters. Exploratory multiple regression analysis showed that baseline adherence to guidelines, and practice and visitor characteristics were related to the number of visits. Visitor characteristics were strongly related to the total time spent on visits, training, and conferring. DISCUSSION: Our findings confirm that, concerning the number of visits, assistance is primarily adapted to the unique attributes of each clinic. It may be useful, from the viewpoint of cost-effectiveness, to standardize the performance of visitors somewhat more with regard to the visit length. The tailoring mechanism resulted in time well spent in assisting practices. We hope that our results contribute to the further development of the outreach method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9690883     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/10.2.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  6 in total

1.  Process evaluation on quality improvement interventions.

Authors:  M E J L Hulscher; M G H Laurant; R P T M Grol
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

2.  A process evaluation of an intervention to improve respiratory infection control practices in family physician offices.

Authors:  Patricia Huston; William Hogg; Carmel Martin; Enrique Soto; Adriana Newbury
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

3.  Genetics support to primary care practitioners - a demonstration project.

Authors:  N Drury; J Bethea; P Guilbert; N Qureshi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A cluster randomised controlled trial of a pharmacist-led collaborative intervention to improve statin prescribing and attainment of cholesterol targets in primary care.

Authors:  Richard Lowrie; Suzanne M Lloyd; Alex McConnachie; Jill Morrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Designing a multifaceted quality improvement intervention in primary care in a country where general practice is seeking recognition: the case of Cyprus.

Authors:  George A Samoutis; Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Henri E Stoffers; Theodora Zachariadou; Anastasios Philalithis; Christos Lionis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Cost savings associated with improving appropriate and reducing inappropriate preventive care: cost-consequences analysis.

Authors:  William Hogg; Neill Baskerville; Jacques Lemelin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.