Literature DB >> 12566610

Ethical, legal and economic issues raised by the use of human tissue in postgenomic research.

M A Reymond1, R Steinert, J Escourrou, G Fourtanier.   

Abstract

Ethical, legal and economic framework issues concerning human samples, genetic data and bioresources are rapidly evolving. In most cases, international standards have not been defined. National legislations on the use and exploitation of human sample collections differ widely. Legislations relating to intellectual property rights, access to database information for public or private bodies, of national or foreign origin, are similarly diverse. Importation and exportation rules, concerning in particular data protection, biosafety and protection of individual rights, have not always been defined. This article makes a short assessment of the legal, ethical and economic framework in selected EC countries (Germany, France and UK), and compares them with the conditions in the USA. On the basis of the information collected, it is obvious that the use of human cells, tissues and organs in medical research has to be considered as a global, worldwide question. Such use has profound ethical, cultural and economic consequences not only in the country of origin, but also globally. Biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies conducting research with human samples are facing different framework conditions in the area of data protection, policy measures, economic support, exportation, etc., that already influence trade activities and investments of such firms at the international level. Over the 3 last years, a trend towards harmonization can be recognized: the World Health Organization has recognized the problems of postgenomic medical research as a priority. The OECD has created a taskforce on centers for biological resources. Biobanks are a common theme of the French and the German National Ethic Councils. A lack of international harmonization and consistency might not only present a challenge to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, but can also endanger the goals the laws and regulations seek to achieve. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12566610     DOI: 10.1159/000067677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis        ISSN: 0257-2753            Impact factor:   2.404


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bodily rights and property rights.

Authors:  B Björkman; S O Hansson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Different types--different rights. Distinguishing between different perspectives on ownership of biological material.

Authors:  Barbro Björkman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Ethical and Legal Issues in Biobanking for Genomic Research in Nigeria.

Authors:  Simisola O Akintola
Journal:  BEOnline       Date:  2012

4.  Tumour banks in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  J Balaguer; A Cañete; E Costa; S Oltra; M Hernández; V Castel
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  A biobank management model applicable to biomedical research.

Authors:  Christiane Auray-Blais; Johane Patenaude
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Biobanks for genomics and genomics for biobanks.

Authors:  Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Pascal Ducournau; Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; David Pontille
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2003
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.