Literature DB >> 12564760

Phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection.

Victor S Ferreira1, Zenzi M Griffin.   

Abstract

Speakers produce words to convey meaning, but does meaning alone determine which words they say? We report three experiments that show independent semantic and phonological influences converging to determine word selection. Speakers named pictures (e.g., of a priest) following visually presented cloze sentences that primed either semantic competitors of the target object name ("The woman went to the convent to become a..."), homophones of the competitors ("I thought that there would still be some cookies left, but there were..."), or matched unrelated control object names. Primed semantic competitors (nun) were produced instead of picture names more often than primed unrelated control object names, showing the well-documented influence of semantic similarity on lexical selection. Surprisingly, primed homophone competitors (none) also substituted for picture names more often than control object names even though they only sounded like competitors. Thus, independent semantic and phonological influences can converge to affect word selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12564760     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.01424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  17 in total

1.  What the tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) says about homophone frequency inheritance.

Authors:  Inés Antón-Méndez; Carson T Schütze; Mary K Champion; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

2.  Top-down influences on lexical selection during spoken word production: A 4T fMRI investigation of refractory effects in picture naming.

Authors:  Greig de Zubicaray; Katie McMahon; Mathew Eastburn; Alan Pringle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Markus F Damian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-04

4.  Phonological regularities and grammatical gender retrieval in spoken word recognition and word production.

Authors:  Katharina Spalek; Julie Franck; Herbert Schriefers; Ulrich H Frauenfelder
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-05-09

5.  The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation.

Authors:  Matthew Goldrick; Rhonda McClain; Emily Cibelli; Yossi Adi; Erin Gustafson; Cornelia Moers; Joseph Keshet
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Effect of sound similarity and word position on lexical selection.

Authors:  Megan Reilly; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Friends and foes in the lexicon: homophone naming in aphasia.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Qi Chen; Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Cherry pit primes Brad Pitt: Homophone priming effects on young and older adults' production of proper names.

Authors:  Deborah M Burke; Jill Kester Locantore; Ayda A Austin; Bryan Chae
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03

9.  Are phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection the result of a monitoring bias?

Authors:  Els Severens; Elie Ratinckx; Victor S Ferreira; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  The (in)dependence of articulation and lexical planning during isolated word production.

Authors:  Esteban Buz; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.