Literature DB >> 15175495

The problem of appraising qualitative research.

M Dixon-Woods1, R L Shaw, S Agarwal, J A Smith.   

Abstract

Qualitative research can make a valuable contribution to the study of quality and safety in health care. Sound ways of appraising qualitative research are needed, but currently there are many different proposals with few signs of an emerging consensus. One problem has been the tendency to treat qualitative research as a unified field. We distinguish universal features of quality from those specific to methodology and offer a set of minimally prescriptive prompts to assist with the assessment of generic features of qualitative research. In using these, account will need to be taken of the particular method of data collection and methodological approach being used. There may be a need for appraisal criteria suited to the different methods of qualitative data collection and to different methodological approaches. These more specific criteria would help to distinguish fatal flaws from more minor errors in the design, conduct, and reporting of qualitative research. There will be difficulties in doing this because some aspects of qualitative research, particularly those relating to quality of insight and interpretation, will remain difficult to appraise and will rely largely on subjective judgement.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15175495      PMCID: PMC1743851          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  9 in total

Review 1.  Explicit guidelines for qualitative research: a step in the right direction, a defence of the 'soft' option, or a form of sociological imperialism?

Authors:  A Chapple; A Rogers
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Qualitative research in systematic reviews. Has established a place for itself.

Authors:  M Dixon-Woods; R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

Review 3.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?

Authors:  R S Barbour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

4.  Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research.

Authors:  J Popay; A Rogers; G Williams
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  1998-05

5.  Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals.

Authors:  E H Bradley; E S Holmboe; J A Mattera; S A Roumanis; M J Radford; H M Krumholz
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-02

6.  Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality.

Authors:  C Pope; P van Royen; R Baker
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

7.  Qualitative research and psychological theorizing.

Authors:  K L Henwood; N F Pidgeon
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1992-02

8.  Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care.

Authors:  Rona Campbell; Pandora Pound; Catherine Pope; Nicky Britten; Roisin Pill; Myfanwy Morgan; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic study.

Authors:  K Taxis; N Barber
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-10
  9 in total
  118 in total

Review 1.  Care-seeking decisions for worsening symptoms in heart failure: a qualitative metasynthesis.

Authors:  S E Ivynian; M DiGiacomo; P J Newton
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Pain and fracture-related limitations persist 6 months after a fragility fracture.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Lucy Frankel; Stephen Thielke; Larry Funnell
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.

Authors:  Andrew Booth
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-10

Review 4.  The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems: a review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control.

Authors:  Regien G Biesma; Ruairí Brugha; Andrew Harmer; Aisling Walsh; Neil Spicer; Gill Walt
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.344

5.  Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Deborah J Cohen; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Improving utility of evidence synthesis for healthy public policy: the three Rs (relevance, rigor, and readability [and resources]).

Authors:  Hilary Thomson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Community-based services for homeless adults experiencing concurrent mental health and substance use disorders: a realist approach to synthesizing evidence.

Authors:  Patricia O'Campo; Maritt Kirst; Nicole Schaefer-McDaniel; Michelle Firestone; Allison Scott; Kelly McShane
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  Management of depression and referral of older people to psychological therapies: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Rachael Frost; Angela Beattie; Cini Bhanu; Kate Walters; Yoav Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Child abuse and neglect among orphaned children and youth living in extended families in sub-Saharan Africa: What have we learned from qualitative inquiry?

Authors:  Gillian Morantz; Donald Cole; Rachel Vreeman; Samuel Ayaya; David Ayuku; Paula Braitstein
Journal:  Vulnerable Child Youth Stud       Date:  2013-01-01

Review 10.  Twenty-four/seven: a mixed-method systematic review of the off-shift literature.

Authors:  Pamela B de Cordova; Ciaran S Phibbs; Ann P Bartel; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 3.187

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.