Literature DB >> 12557077

Attitudes of health care workers towards waking a terminally ill patient in the intensive care unit for treatment decisions.

Bernice S Elger1, Jean-Claude Chevrolet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether health care workers would wake an intubated patient whose preferences are not known, and whether attitudes are influenced by how health care workers themselves would like to be treated if they were in the patient's place. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
SUBJECTS: Convenience sample of 90 participants at a postgraduate lecture to anesthesiologists and related professions. Participants filled out questionnaires after a case presentation followed by two commentaries, one arguing against, the other for waking a 49-year-old intubated patient suffering from a large, intratracheal, poorly differentiated metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the lungs. The patient was not aware of the diagnosis and poor prognosis and had not expressed any preferences.
RESULTS: Participants were almost equally divided between the two alternatives. Significant differences were found between professions concerning the willingness not to wake the patient (19.8% of nurses vs. 45% of physicians and others). There was a strong correlation between the preferences of the health care worker for her-/himself and what he/she would do if in charge of the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that attitudes of health care workers towards waking and informing an intubated patient in the intensive care unit about a hopeless situation differ. Educational programs should ensure that physicians and nurses, especially when discussing and deciding withdrawal of vital support, are aware of theses differences and realize that their own behavior can be influenced by their own preferences if themselves in the patient's situation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12557077     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1612-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  13 in total

1.  Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire.

Authors:  J L Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Factors affecting physicians' decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments in terminal care.

Authors:  H Hinkka; E Kosunen; R Metsänoja; U-K Lammi; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Influence of an advance directive on the initiation of life support technology in critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  S Kish Wallace; C G Martin; A D Shaw; K J Price
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Do-not-resuscitate orders--should the patient be informed?

Authors:  R Löfmark; T Nilstun
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Should the ventilator be withdrawn? Attitudes of the general public, nurses and physicians.

Authors:  P Sjökvist; L Berggren; M Svantesson; T Nilstun
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey. French LATAREA Group.

Authors:  E Ferrand; R Robert; P Ingrand; F Lemaire
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-01-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Advance care planning: pitfalls, progress, promise.

Authors:  T J Prendergast
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses.

Authors:  D P Sulmasy; P B Terry; C S Weisman; D J Miller; R Y Stallings; M A Vettese; K B Haller
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support.

Authors:  N A Christakis; D A Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Myth of substituted judgment. Surrogate decision making regarding life support is unreliable.

Authors:  J Suhl; P Simons; T Reedy; T Garrick
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  [The problem of performing medical procedures without informed consent in unconscious patients].

Authors:  H-C Hansen; R Drews; P W Gaidzik
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Ethics roundtable debate: should a sedated dying patient be wakened to say goodbye to family?

Authors:  Anna Batchelor; Leslie Jenal; Farhad Kapadia; Stephen Streat; Leslie Whetstine; Brian Woodcock
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 9.097

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.