Literature DB >> 10470775

Forgoing life support in western European intensive care units: the results of an ethical questionnaire.

J L Vincent1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine current views of European intensive care physicians regarding end-of-life decisions.
DESIGN: A questionnaire was sent to all physician members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. All questionnaires were anonymous.
RESULTS: A total of 504 completed questionnaires from 16 western European countries were analyzed. Eighty-seven percent of the respondents were male. Forty-six percent of respondents said that intensive care unit admissions were generally or commonly affected by bed shortages, particularly in the south. Nevertheless, 73% of units frequently admit patients with no hope of survival, although only 33% of respondents felt that such patients should be admitted. Eighty percent of respondents felt that written do-not-resuscitate orders should be applied, but only 58% did so, with a wide variation according to country (from 8% in Italy to 91% in The Netherlands). Ninety-three percent of physicians sometimes withhold treatment from patients with no hope of a meaningful life, but withdrawal of treatment is less common. Forty percent of respondents said that they would deliberately administer large doses of drugs to such patients until death ensued. Forty-nine percent of respondents involved staff, patients, and family in end-of-life decisions. Forty-five percent of respondents felt that an ethics consultation was useful in such situations. Physicians in the countries of southern Europe were less likely than those in the north to apply do-not-resuscitate orders, withhold treatment, and discuss such issues with the patients. However, they were more likely to value the opinion of an ethics consultant.
CONCLUSIONS: Intensive care unit admissions are frequently limited by the availability of beds across Europe, particularly in the south and in the United Kingdom, yet 73% of intensivists still admit patients with no hope of survival. When treating patients with no hope of survival, 40% of intensivists will deliberately administer large doses of drugs until death ensues. There are interesting differences between what a physician actually does and what he or she believes should be done with regard to various ethical questions. Important differences in attitudes also exist between European countries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10470775     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  92 in total

Review 1.  Conditions and consequences of medical futility--from a literature review to a clinical model.

Authors:  R Löfmark; T Nilstun
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Factors affecting physicians' decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatments in terminal care.

Authors:  H Hinkka; E Kosunen; R Metsänoja; U-K Lammi; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Ethics and decision making in end stage lung disease.

Authors:  A K Simonds
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Withdrawing life support and resolution of conflict with families.

Authors:  Jenny Way; Anthony L Back; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-07

5.  Excellence in end-of-life care: a goal for intensivists.

Authors:  Robert D Troung; Jeffrey P Burns
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Association between education in EOL care and variability in EOL practice: a survey of ICU physicians.

Authors:  Daniel Neves Forte; Jean Louis Vincent; Irineu Tadeu Velasco; Marcelo Park
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Intensivists managing end-of-life care: dwarfs without giants' shoulders to stand upon.

Authors:  Nereo Zamperetti; Pasquale Piccinni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units.

Authors:  Sara K Johnson; Christopher A Bautista; Seo Yeon Hong; Lisa Weissfeld; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Thomas Woodcock; Peter Sjokvist; Bara Ricou; Hans-Henrik Bulow; Anne Lippert; Paulo Maia; Simon Cohen; Mario Baras; Seppo Hovilehto; Didier Ledoux; Dermot Phelan; Elisabet Wennberg; Wolfgang Schobersberger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a Lebanese intensive care unit: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Alexandre Yazigi; Moussa Riachi; Georges Dabbar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-05       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.