Literature DB >> 12554445

Taxon sampling, bioinformatics, and phylogenomics.

Michael S Rosenberg1, Sudhir Kumar.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 12554445      PMCID： PMC2796430          DOI： 10.1080/10635150390132894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN： 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used.

Authors:  K Takahashi; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  M S Rosenberg; S Kumar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias.

Authors:  D M Hillis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  David D Pollock; Derrick J Zwickl; Jimmy A McGuire; David M Hillis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  A stepwise algorithm for finding minimum evolution trees.

Authors:  S Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Molecular dating and biogeography of the early placental mammal radiation.

Authors:  E Eizirik; W J Murphy; S J O'Brien
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals.

Authors:  W J Murphy; E Eizirik; W E Johnson; Y P Zhang; O A Ryder; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  K Tamura; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small.

Authors:  M Nei; S Kumar; K Takahashi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  M Hasegawa; H Kishino; T Yano
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.395
View more
  28 in total

1.  Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  Yuri I Wolf; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference?

Authors:  David M Hillis; David D Pollock; Jimmy A McGuire; Derrick J Zwickl
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Novel relationships among ten fish model species revealed based on a phylogenomic analysis using ESTs.

Authors:  Dirk Steinke; Walter Salzburger; Axel Meyer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Microbial community composition of the Danshui river estuary of Northern Taiwan and the practicality of the phylogenetic method in microbial barcoding.

Authors:  Pei-Chun Liao; Bing-Hong Huang; Shong Huang
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  The phylogenetic informativeness of nucleotide and amino acid sequences for reconstructing the vertebrate tree.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Townsend; Francesc López-Giráldez; Robert Friedman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 6.  The impact of taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference: a review of two decades of controversy.

Authors:  Ahmed Ragab Nabhan; Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Mitochondrial data are not suitable for resolving placental mammal phylogeny.

Authors:  Claire C Morgan; Christopher J Creevey; Mary J O'Connell
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  What is the phylogenetic signal limit from mitogenomes? The reconciliation between mitochondrial and nuclear data in the Insecta class phylogeny.

Authors:  Gerard Talavera; Roger Vila
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  The effect of branch lengths on phylogeny: an empirical study using highly conserved orthologs from mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Austin L Hughes; Robert Friedman
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 4.286

10.  Assessing the value of DNA barcodes and other priority gene regions for molecular phylogenetics of Lepidoptera.

Authors:  John James Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.