Literature DB >> 12553544

Double-pass measurement of retinal image quality in the chicken eye.

Nancy J Coletta1, Susana Marcos, Christine Wildsoet, David Troilo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The chicken, Gallus gallus domesticus, is used as an animal model to study the development of refractive error. Although vision is important in determining the eye's refractive state, relatively little is known about the retinal image quality of the chicken eye. An objective double-pass technique was used to measure the optical quality of the eyes of White Leghorn chickens.
METHODS: Measurements were made on 21 eyes of six untreated birds and eight experimental birds that were members of a study of refractive development. Ages ranged from 3 to 6 weeks, and refractions ranged from -1.29 to +0.58 D in the untreated eyes and -4.58 to +10.17 D in the experimental eyes. The measurements were made under general anesthesia combined with either cycloplegia or ciliary nerve section. Proper optical alignment of the eye was achieved with the aid of a TV monitor, CCD camera, and an infrared source. A 543-nm laser point source was focused on the retina, and the double-pass aerial image was collected by a high-resolution CCD camera. Refractive errors were corrected with trial lenses, using a bracketing method to optimize the retinal images. Both the full width at half-maximum of the double-pass aerial image and the single-pass modulation transfer function were used as objective estimates of the optical quality.
RESULTS: The mean full width at half-maximum value in eyes of the untreated birds was 1.60 min arc for a 4.50-mm mean pupil diameter. Optical quality tended to be worse in the experimental myopic eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: The optical quality of the chicken eye measured under monochromatic conditions meets or may even exceed the neural limits of spatial acuity based on anatomical estimates of ganglion cell spacing. The data also suggest that optical quality is worse in myopic eyes, which is consistent with studies of human eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12553544     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200301000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  11 in total

1.  Single cell imaging of the chick retina with adaptive optics.

Authors:  Kenneth Headington; Stacey S Choi; Debora Nickla; Nathan Doble
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.424

2.  Monochromatic ocular wave aberrations in young monkeys.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Aberrations of chick eyes during normal growth and lens induction of myopia.

Authors:  Marsha L Kisilak; Melanie C W Campbell; Jennifer J Hunter; Elizabeth L Irving; Lan Huang
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  IMI - Report on Experimental Models of Emmetropization and Myopia.

Authors:  David Troilo; Earl L Smith; Debora L Nickla; Regan Ashby; Andrei V Tkatchenko; Lisa A Ostrin; Timothy J Gawne; Machelle T Pardue; Jody A Summers; Chea-Su Kee; Falk Schroedl; Siegfried Wahl; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Ocular wavefront aberrations in the common marmoset Callithrix jacchus: effects of age and refractive error.

Authors:  Nancy J Coletta; Susana Marcos; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visually guided chick ocular length and structural thickness variations assessed by swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Feng Yan; Chen Wang; Jayla A Wilson; Michael O'Connell; Sam Ton; Noah Davidson; Mourren Sibichan; Kari Chambers; Ahmed Ahmed; Jody Summers; Qinggong Tang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Wave aberrations in rhesus monkeys with vision-induced ametropias.

Authors:  Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Chea-Su Kee; Li-Fang Hung; Ying Qiao-Grider; Juan Huang; Austin Roorda; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-06       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Chick eyes compensate for chromatic simulations of hyperopic and myopic defocus: evidence that the eye uses longitudinal chromatic aberration to guide eye-growth.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The significance of retinal image contrast and spatial frequency composition for eye growth modulation in young chicks.

Authors:  Nina Tran; Sara Chiu; Yibin Tian; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Brightness discrimination in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Olle Lind; Sandra Karlsson; Almut Kelber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.