Literature DB >> 19383509

Chick eyes compensate for chromatic simulations of hyperopic and myopic defocus: evidence that the eye uses longitudinal chromatic aberration to guide eye-growth.

Frances J Rucker1, Josh Wallman.   

Abstract

Longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) causes short wavelengths to be focused in front of long wavelengths. This chromatic signal is evidently used to guide ocular accommodation. We asked whether chick eyes exposed to static gratings simulating the chromatic effects of myopic or hyperopic defocus would "compensate" for the simulated defocus. We alternately exposed one eye of each chick to a sine-wave grating (5 or 2 cycle/deg) simulating myopic defocus ("MY defocus": image focused in front of retina; hence, red contrast higher than blue) and the other eye to a grating of the same spatial frequency simulating hyperopic defocus ("HY defocus": blue contrast higher than red). The chicks were placed in a drum with one eye covered with one grating, and then switched to another drum with the other grating with the other eye covered. To minimize the effects of altered eye-growth on image contrast, we studied only the earliest responses: first, we measured changes in choroidal thickness 45 min to 1 h after one 15-min episode in the drum, then we measured glycosaminoglycans (GAG) synthesis in sclera and choroid (by the incorporation of labeled sulfate in tissue culture) after a day of four 30-min episodes in the drum. The eyes compensated in the appropriate directions: The choroids of the eyes exposed to the HY simulation showed significantly more thinning (less thickening) over the course of the experiment than the choroids of the eyes exposed to the MY simulation (all groups mean:-17 microm; 5 c/d groups: -24 microm; paired t-test (one-tailed): p=0.0006). The rate of scleral GAG synthesis in the eye exposed to the HY simulation was significantly greater than in the eye exposed to the MY simulation (HY/MY ratio=1.20; one sample t-test (one-tailed): p=0.015). There was no significant interaction between the sign of the simulated defocus and either the spatial frequency or the presence of a +3 D lens used to compensate for the 33 cm distance of the drum. Although previous work has shown that chromatic cues to defocus are not essential for lens-compensation, in that chicks can compensate in monochromatic light, our evidence implies that the eye may be able to infer whether the eye is myopic or hyperopic from the different chromatic contrasts that result from different signs of defocus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19383509      PMCID: PMC2779109          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  28 in total

1.  Accommodation to static chromatic simulations of blurred retinal images.

Authors:  J H Lee; L R Stark; S Cohen; P B Kruger
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Refractive error and the green/red ratio.

Authors:  R E WIENKE
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1960-04

3.  Contrast and spatial-frequency requirements for emmetropization in chicks.

Authors:  K L Schmid; C F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Cone contributions to signals for accommodation and the relationship to refractive error.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Philip B Kruger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Cone signals for spectacle-lens compensation: differential responses to short and long wavelengths.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Accommodation responds to changing contrast of long, middle and short spectral-waveband components of the retinal image.

Authors:  P B Kruger; S Mathews; K R Aggarwala; D Yager; E S Kruger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The eye of the blue acara (Aequidens pulcher, Cichlidae) grows to compensate for defocus due to chromatic aberration.

Authors:  R H Kröger; H J Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H C Howland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Incidence of myopia in high school students with and without red-green color vision deficiency.

Authors:  Yi-Shan Qian; Ren-Yuan Chu; Ji C He; Xing-Huai Sun; Xing-Tao Zhou; Nai-Qing Zhao; Dan-Ning Hu; Matthew R Hoffman; Jin-Hui Dai; Xiao-Mei Qu; Kristina E Yi-Hwa Pao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Proteoglycan synthesis by scleral chondrocytes is modulated by a vision dependent mechanism.

Authors:  J A Rada; A L McFarland; P K Cornuet; J R Hassell
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.424

View more
  32 in total

1.  Chicks use changes in luminance and chromatic contrast as indicators of the sign of defocus.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Visual regulation of refractive development: insights from animal studies.

Authors:  E L Smith; L-F Hung; B Arumugam
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The hyperopic effect of narrow-band long-wavelength light in tree shrews increases non-linearly with duration.

Authors:  Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton; Carrie E Huisingh; Timothy J Gawne
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The role of temporal contrast and blue light in emmetropization.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Mark Henriksen; Tiffany Yanase; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Signals for defocus arise from longitudinal chromatic aberration in chick.

Authors:  Frances J Rucker; Rhea T Eskew; Christopher Taylor
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Long-wavelength (red) light produces hyperopia in juvenile and adolescent tree shrews.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Narrow-band, long-wavelength lighting promotes hyperopia and retards vision-induced myopia in infant rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Li-Fang Hung; Baskar Arumugam; Zhihui She; Lisa Ostrin; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Compensation to positive as well as negative lenses can occur in chicks reared in bright UV lighting.

Authors:  David S Hammond; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The wavelength composition and temporal modulation of ambient lighting strongly affect refractive development in young tree shrews.

Authors:  Timothy J Gawne; John T Siegwart; Alexander H Ward; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Opposing effects of atropine and timolol on the color and luminance emmetropization mechanisms in chicks.

Authors:  Laura A Goldberg; Frances J Rucker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.