Literature DB >> 12551677

Comparison of a digital and a handheld infrared pupillometer for determining scotopic pupil diameter.

Thomas Kohnen1, Evdoxia Terzi, Jens Bühren, Eva Maria Kohnen.   

Abstract

To compare a digital infrared pupillometer with a handheld infrared pupillometer for determining scotopic pupil size. Department of Ophthalmology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. In 100 eyes of 50 healthy individuals (mean age 38.8 years +/- 10.7 [SD]), the scotopic pupil size was measured with a digital (Procyon) and a handheld (Colvard) infrared pupillometer. After dark adaptation of 1 minute, measurements were performed with both devices by 2 examiners (E1 and E2). Agreement and repeatability were analyzed using a comparison method described by Bland and Altman. The mean scotopic pupil diameter was 5.90 +/- 0.97 mm (range 3.24 to 7.91 mm) with the Procyon and 5.78 +/- 0.98 mm (range 3.00 to 7.30 mm) with the Colvard pupillometer. The mean difference between the 2 devices was -0.01 mm (E1) and -0.24 mm (E2). The limits of agreement ranged from 2.84 (E1) to 3.24 (E2). The coefficients of repeatability were 0.64 (Procyon) and 1.16 (Colvard). The mean difference between E1 and E2 was -0.10 for the Procyon and 0.13 for the Colvard pupillometer. The limits of agreement ranged from 1.28 (Procyon) to 2.32 (Colvard). The digital infrared pupillometer (Procyon) demonstrated better repeatability and agreement in measuring scotopic pupil size than a handheld device (Colvard).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12551677     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01898-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  7 in total

1.  Measurements of anterior segment parameters using three different non-contact optical devices in keratoconus patients.

Authors:  Ahmet Taylan Yazıcı; Gökhan Pekel; Ercüment Bozkurt; Yusuf Yıldırım; Evre Pekel; Ahmet Demirok; Omer Faruk Yılmaz
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  A simple infrared-augmented digital photography technique for detection of pupillary abnormalities.

Authors:  Tarek A Shazly; G R Bonhomme
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Corneal white-to-white distance and mesopic pupil diameter.

Authors:  Hasan Basri Cakmak; Nurullah Cagil; Huseyin Simavli; Sabri Raza
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Digital Pupillometry in Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Annekatrin Rickmann; Maria Waizel; Sara Kazerounian; Peter Szurman; Helmut Wilhelm; Karl T Boden
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2016-10-03

5.  Can we measure mesopic pupil size with the cobalt blue light slit-lamp biomicroscopy method?

Authors:  Miguel J Maldonado; Alberto López-Miguel; David P Piñero; José R Juberías; Juan C Nieto; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  [Intraindividual comparison of higher order aberrations after implantation of aspherical and spherical IOLs depending on pupil diameter].

Authors:  T Kasper; J Bühren; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Intrasession repeatability of pupil size measurements under different light levels provided by a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Dolores de Fez; Inmaculada Cabezos; Alberto López-Navarro; María T Caballero; Vicente J Camps
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.209

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.