| Literature DB >> 12546713 |
Rungnapa Hirunsatit1, Narisorn Kongruttanachok, Kanjana Shotelersuk, Pakpoom Supiyaphun, Narin Voravud, Anavaj Sakuntabhai, Apiwat Mutirangura.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is an important squamous cell cancer endemic in Southeast Asia and the Far East and can be considered a multifactorial genetic disease. This research explores potential associations between nasopharyngeal epithelial EBV receptor and NPC susceptibility. To prove the hypothesis, we evaluated two candidate genes, complement receptor 2 (CR2) and polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (PIGR) by using 4 SNPs, CR2IVS2-848C-->T, PIGRIVS3-156G-->T, PIGR1093G-->A and PIGR1739C-->T, to genotype 175 cases and 317 controls, divided into Thai, Chinese and Thai-Chinese based on their respective ethnic origins.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12546713 PMCID: PMC149362 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-4-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Figure 1SNPs analysis of CR2 and PIGR. (A) The CR2IVS2-848C→T was distinguishable by TaqI restriction. Digestion of the 1241 bp amplicon yielded two DNA fragments, 750 and 491 bp. Lane 1, 3 and 4 were homozygous -/- and lane 2 was heterozygous +/-. (B-D) PIGR polymorphisms was investigated by PCR-RFLP and ARMS. (B) RFLP analysis of 1392 bp PIGRIVS3-156G→T PCR products with PvuII digestion yielded 1163 and 229 bp DNA fragments. Lane 1,2,4,7 and 8 were heterozygous +/-, samples 3,9 and 12 were homozygous +/+, and samples 5,6,10 and 11 were homozygous -/-. (C) RFLP of PIGR1739C of the 220 bp PCR product was analyzed by HgaI digestion and yielded two fragments of 180 and 40 bp, respectively, whereas 1739T remained as 220 bp DNA product. Heterozygous CT yielded 220,180 and 40 bp fragments. Negative control in lane1; homozygous CC in lanes 2,5,7 and 8; heterozygous CT in lanes 3 and 6, and homozygous TT in lane 4. (D) PIGR1093G→A was detected by ARMS. Negative control in lanes 1 and 2 for primer sets A and B. Samples S1, 2, 3, were homozygous 1093G. Samples S4, 5, 6 were homozygous 1093A, and S7 was heterozygous.
CR2 and PIGR polymorphisms in NPC cases and control subjects.
| THAI | CHINESE | TOTAL | |||||
| case | control | case | control | case | control | ||
| Number of tests | 110 | 104 | 42 | 107 | 175 | 317 | |
| CR2IVS2-848C→T | |||||||
| +/+ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| +/- | 34 | 20 | 7 | 21 | 48 | 63 | |
| -/- | 76 | 83 | 34 | 85 | 125 | 252 | |
| + allele frequency | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.11 | |
| Crude OR (95%CI) | 1.55(0.84–2.85) | 1.00(0.41–2.39) | 1.48(0.98–2.22)1 | ||||
| Ethnic group adjusted OR (95%CI) | 1.47(0.96–2.26) | ||||||
| age, sex and ethnic group adjusted OR (95%CI) | 1.80(1.14–3.03)1 | ||||||
| +/+ | 32 | 30 | 9 | 42 | 49 | 114 | |
| +/- | 61 | 58 | 26 | 48 | 99 | 155 | |
| -/- | 17 | 16 | 7 | 17 | 27 | 48 | |
| + allele frequency | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.56 | 0.60 | |
| Crude OR (95%CI) | 1.00(0.67–1.50) | 0.68(0.40–1.17) | 0.84(0.64–1.11) | ||||
| Ethnic group adjusted OR (95%CI) | 0.88(0.66–1.18) | ||||||
| Age, sex and ethnic group adjusted OR (95%CI) | 0.93(0.67–1.29) | ||||||
| GG | 53 | 48 | 17 | 52 | 79 | 142 | |
| GA | 49 | 46 | 24 | 42 | 82 | 137 | |
| AA | 8 | 10 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 38 | |
| G allele frequency | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.66 | |
| Crude OR (95%CI) | 1.11(0.72–1.71) | 1.04(0.58–1.86) | 1.10(0.83–1.47) | ||||
| Ethnic group adjusted OR (95%CI) | 1.03(0.76–1.40) | ||||||
| Age, sex and ethnic group adjusted OR (95%CI) | 0.96(0.68–1.36) | ||||||
| CC | 79 | 58 | 32 | 60 | 132 | 170 | |
| CT | 26 | 40 | 9 | 38 | 37 | 130 | |
| TT | 5 | 6 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 17 | |
| C allele frequency | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.86 | 0.74 | |
| Crude OR (95%CI) | 1.70(1.03–2.82)1 | 2.35(1.11–5.07)1 | 2.14(1.49–3.09)3 | ||||
| Ethnic group adjusted OR (95%CI) | 2.26(1.51–3.25)3 | ||||||
| Age, sex and ethnic group adjusted OR (95%CI) | 2.06(1.36–3.30)2 | ||||||
Total is Thai, Chinese and Thai-Chinese cases and controls. CR2IVS2-848C→T and PIGRIVS3-156G→T allele+ and allele- are digested and not digested with the restriction enzyme, respectively. G and A are nucleotide at PIGR1093, and C and T are nucleotide at PIGR1739, respectively. OR (95%CI) = odd ratios and 95% confidence interval of allele CR2+, PIGRIVS3-156G, PIGR1093G, PIGR1739C when compared with the other alleles of the same SNPs. 1 p < 0.05, 2 p < 0.001, 3 p < 0.0001
Risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma associated with PIGR1739C→T genotype according to different models of inheritance.
| THAI OR | CHINESE OR | TOTAL OR | ETHNIC GROUP ADJUSTED | AGE, SEX AND ETHNIC GROUP | |
| C codominance, T wild type | |||||
| CC | 1.63(0.42–6.55) | 4.80(0.57–105.53) | 2.20(0.79–6.44) | 2.59(0.85–7.48) | 2.53(0.68–13.43) |
| CT | 0.78(0.18–3.35) | 2.13(0.22–50.65) | 0.81(0.27–2.48) | 1.08(0.34–3.53) | 1.24(0.23–8.00) |
| TT | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| C dominance, T wild type | |||||
| TT | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CC or CT | 1.29(0.33–5.04) | 3.77(0.46–81.87) | 1.60(0.58–4.62) | 1.96(0.66–5.70) | 1.99(0.51–10.40) |
| C recessive, T wild type | |||||
| CT or TT | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CC | 2.02(1.10–3.17)1 | 2.51(1.05–6.09)1 | 2.65(1.73–4.08)3 | 2.71(1.72–4.23)3 | 2.42(1.51–4.29)2 |
CC and TT are the homozygous C and T at nucleotide 1739, respectively. CT is the heterozygous at nucleotide 1739. Total is Thai, Chinese and Thai-Chinese cases and controls. OR (95%CI) is odd ratios and 95% confidence interval between allele and compared allele, 1 p < 0.05, 2 p < 0.001, 3 p < 0.00001
Haplotype frequencies of PIGR1093–1739, crude OR and ethnic group adjusted OR.
| Haplotype | THAI | CHINESE | TOTAL | ETHNIC GROUP ADJUSTED | |||
| case | control | case | control | case | control | ||
| GC frequency | 0.556169 | 0.525147 | 0.590097 | 0.447343 | 0.543478 | 0.451985 | |
| OR (95%CI) | 1.13(0.76–1.68) | 1.18(1.05–3.12) | 1.37(1.04–1.79) | 1.36(1.02–1.80) | |||
| GT frequency | 0.148376 | 0.171968 | 0.100379 | 0.234900 | 0.043478 | 0.175374 | |
| OR (95%CI) | 0.84(0.49–1.46) | 0.35(0.14–0.80) | 0.64(0.43–0.93) | 0.55(0.37–0.84) | |||
| AC frequency | 0.280194 | 0.224853 | 0.278951 | 0.286302 | 0.413043 | 0.283864 | |
| OR (95%CI) | 1.34(0.85–2.13) | 0.95(0.52–1.72) | 1.23(0.91–1.66) | 1.28(0.93–1.76) | |||
| AT frequency | 0.015260 | 0.078032 | 0.030573 | 0.031455 | 0.000001 | 0.088777 | |
| OR (95%CI) | 0.17(0.04–0.62) | 1.10(0.22–4.85) | 0.12(0.03–0.40) | 0.26(0.09–0.63) | |||
| case vs case | 0.085 | ||||||
| case vs control | <0.05a | <0.05b | <0.005c | ||||
| control vs control | 0.192 | ||||||
Each haplotype frequency was calculated by the Estimating Haplotype-frequencies (EH) software program23. Total is Thai, Chinese and Thai-Chinese cases and controls. OR (95%CI) = odd ratios and 95% confidence interval between the tested haplotype and the other three alleles, The OR (95%CI) calculation used the estimated number from each haplotype number of cases and controls. The number of haplotypes in the total category were calculated from the summation of estimated haplotype number from each ethnic. GC, AC, GT, and AT are 1093G-1739C, 1093A-1739C, 1093G-1739T, and 1093A-1739T haplotypes, respectively. Case vs case = p value comparing haplotype frequency between Thai case and Chinese case. Case vs control = p value comparing haplotype frequency between case and control in each ethnic. a is Thai, b is Chinese and c is total. Control vs control = p value comparing haplotype frequency between Thai control and Chinese control.
Ethnic group adjusted odd ratios between each PIGR1093–1739 haplotype.
| GC | AC | GT | AT | |
| GC | 1.00 | 0.97(0.70–1.36) | 1.93(1.24–2.91) | 4.26(1.68–11.85) |
| AC | 1.00 | 2.02(1.23–3.23) | 4.31(1.76–13.18) | |
| GT | 1.00 | 2.18(0.83–7.34) | ||
| AT | 1.00 |
Ethnic group adjusted odd ratios were calculated from the number of cases and controls of each haplotype in the first column by comparing with haplotype listed in the upper row. Numbers before () are odd ratios and within () are 95% confidence interval. GC, AC, GT, and AT are 1093G-1739C, 1093A-1739C, 1093G-1739T, and 1093A-1739T haplotypes, respectively.