Literature DB >> 11036113

CYP17 promoter polymorphism and breast cancer in Australian women under age forty years.

A B Spurdle1, J L Hopper, G S Dite, X Chen, J Cui, M R McCredie, G G Giles, M C Southey, D J Venter, D F Easton, G Chenevix-Trench.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cytochrome P450c17alpha enzyme functions in the steroid biosynthesis pathway, and altered endogenous steroid hormone levels have been reported to be associated with a T to C polymorphism in the 5' promoter region of the CYP17 gene. Because steroid hormone exposure is known to influence breast cancer risk, we conducted a population-based, case-control-family study to assess the relationship between the CYP17 promoter polymorphism and early-onset breast cancer.
METHODS: Case subjects under 40 years of age at diagnosis of a first primary breast cancer, population-sampled control subjects, and the relatives of both case and control subjects were interviewed to record family history of breast cancer and other risk factors. CYP17 genotype was determined in 369 case subjects, 284 control subjects, and 91 relatives of case subjects. Genotype distributions were compared by logistic regression, and cumulative risk was estimated by a modified segregation analysis. All statistical tests were two-tailed.
RESULTS: Compared with the TT genotype (i.e., individuals homozygous for the T allele), the TC genotype was not associated with increased breast cancer risk (P: =.7). Compared with the TT and TC genotypes combined, the CC genotype was associated with a relative risk of 1. 81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-2.86; P: =.01) before adjustment for measured risk factors and 1.63 (95% CI = 1.00-2.64; P: =.05) after adjustment. There was an excess of CC genotypes in case subjects who had at least one affected first- or second-degree relative, compared with control subjects unstratified by family history of breast cancer (23% versus 11%; P: =.006), and these case subjects had a threefold to fourfold higher risk than women of other groups defined by genotype and family history of breast cancer. Analysis of breast cancer in first- and second-degree relatives of case subjects with the CC genotype, excluding two known carriers of a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2, gave a relative hazard in women with the CC genotype of 3.48 (95% CI = 1.13-10.74; P: =.04), which is equivalent to a cumulative risk of 16% to age 70 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The CC genotype may modify the effect of other familial risk factors for early-onset breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11036113     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.20.1674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  15 in total

1.  After BRCA1 and BRCA2-what next? Multifactorial segregation analyses of three-generation, population-based Australian families affected by female breast cancer.

Authors:  J Cui; A C Antoniou; G S Dite; M C Southey; D J Venter; D F Easton; G G Giles; M R McCredie; J L Hopper
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Oligogenic combinations associated with breast cancer risk in women under 53 years of age.

Authors:  Christopher E Aston; David A Ralph; Dominique P Lalo; Sharmila Manjeshwar; Bobby A Gramling; Daniele C DeFreese; Amy D West; Dannielle E Branam; Linda F Thompson; Melissa A Craft; Debra S Mitchell; Craig D Shimasaki; John J Mulvihill; Eldon R Jupe
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  CYP17 gene polymorphism and its association with high-risk north Indian breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Anurupa Chakraborty; N S Murthy; Chintamani Chintamani; D Bhatnagar; R S Mohil; P C Sharma; Sunita Saxena
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Variants of estrogen-related genes and breast cancer risk in European and African American women.

Authors:  Lei Quan; Chi-Chen Hong; Gary Zirpoli; Michelle R Roberts; Thaer Khoury; Lara E Sucheston-Campbell; Dana H Bovbjerg; Lina Jandorf; Karen Pawlish; Gregory Ciupak; Warren Davis; Elisa V Bandera; Christine B Ambrosone; Song Yao
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 5.678

5.  CYP17 and breast cancer: no overall effect, but what about interactions?

Authors:  Julian Little; Jacques Simard
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  CYP17 5'-UTR MspA1 polymorphism and the risk of premenopausal breast cancer in a German population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Emaculate Verla-Tebit; Shan Wang-Gohrke; Jenny Chang-Claude
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 7.  More breast cancer genes?

Authors:  J L Hopper
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2001-03-29       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  CYP17 genetic polymorphism, breast cancer, and breast cancer risk factors: Australian Breast Cancer Family Study.

Authors:  Jiun-Horng Chang; Dorota M Gertig; Xiaoqing Chen; Gillian S Dite; Mark A Jenkins; Roger L Milne; Melissa C Southey; Margaret R E McCredie; Graham G Giles; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; John L Hopper; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor polymorphisms and risk of nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Rungnapa Hirunsatit; Narisorn Kongruttanachok; Kanjana Shotelersuk; Pakpoom Supiyaphun; Narin Voravud; Anavaj Sakuntabhai; Apiwat Mutirangura
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  CYP17 genetic polymorphism, breast cancer, and breast cancer risk factors.

Authors:  Christine B Ambrosone; Kirsten B Moysich; Helena Furberg; Jo L Freudenheim; Elise D Bowman; Sabrina Ahmed; Saxon Graham; John E Vena; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-01-29       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.