| Literature DB >> 12543542 |
Charles R Bonapace1, John A Bosso, Lawrence V Friedrich, Roger L White.
Abstract
Four different methods for interpreting the results of checkerboard synergy testing were compared by applying each to a set of synergy study data. Statistically significant differences in synergy were detected among methods (% synergy ranged from 10 to 83%). As interpretations were found to vary widely based upon method, one should be aware of this in interpreting the relevant literature.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12543542 DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00473-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ISSN: 0732-8893 Impact factor: 2.803