OBJECTIVE: To examine if delayed transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) after physiologic deterioration is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: Inception cohort. SETTING: Community hospital in Ogden, Utah. PATIENTS: Ninety-one consecutive inpatients with noncardiac diagnoses at the time of emergent transfer to the ICU. We determined the time when each patient first met any of 11 pre-specified physiologic criteria. We classified patients as "slow transfer" when patients met a physiologic criterion 4 or more hours before transfer to the ICU. Patients were followed until discharge. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: In-hospital mortality, functional status at hospital discharge, hospital resources. MAIN RESULTS: At the time when the first physiologic criterion was met on the ward, slow- and rapid-transfer patients were similar in terms of age, gender, diagnosis, number of days in hospital prior to ICU transfer, prehospital functional status, and APACHE II scores. By the time slow-transfer patients were admitted to the ICU, they had significantly higher APACHE II scores (21.7 vs 16.2; P =.002) and were more likely to die in-hospital (41% vs 11%; relative risk [RR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.4 to 9.5). Slow-transfer patients were less likely to have had their physician notified of deterioration within 2 hours of meeting physiologic criteria (59% vs 31%; P =.001) and less likely to have had a bedside physician evaluation within the first 3 hours after meeting criteria (23% vs 83%; P =.001). CONCLUSIONS: Slow transfer to the ICU of physiologically defined high-risk hospitalized patients was associated with increased risk of death. Slow response to physiologic deterioration may explain these findings.
OBJECTIVE: To examine if delayed transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) after physiologic deterioration is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: Inception cohort. SETTING: Community hospital in Ogden, Utah. PATIENTS: Ninety-one consecutive inpatients with noncardiac diagnoses at the time of emergent transfer to the ICU. We determined the time when each patient first met any of 11 pre-specified physiologic criteria. We classified patients as "slow transfer" when patients met a physiologic criterion 4 or more hours before transfer to the ICU. Patients were followed until discharge. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: In-hospital mortality, functional status at hospital discharge, hospital resources. MAIN RESULTS: At the time when the first physiologic criterion was met on the ward, slow- and rapid-transfer patients were similar in terms of age, gender, diagnosis, number of days in hospital prior to ICU transfer, prehospital functional status, and APACHE II scores. By the time slow-transfer patients were admitted to the ICU, they had significantly higher APACHE II scores (21.7 vs 16.2; P =.002) and were more likely to die in-hospital (41% vs 11%; relative risk [RR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.4 to 9.5). Slow-transfer patients were less likely to have had their physician notified of deterioration within 2 hours of meeting physiologic criteria (59% vs 31%; P =.001) and less likely to have had a bedside physician evaluation within the first 3 hours after meeting criteria (23% vs 83%; P =.001). CONCLUSIONS: Slow transfer to the ICU of physiologically defined high-risk hospitalized patients was associated with increased risk of death. Slow response to physiologic deterioration may explain these findings.
Authors: Matthew M Churpek; Blair Wendlandt; Frank J Zadravecz; Richa Adhikari; Christopher Winslow; Dana P Edelson Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: David N Hager; Pranav Chandrashekar; Robert W Bradsher; Ali M Abdel-Halim; Souvik Chatterjee; Melinda Sawyer; Roy G Brower; Dale M Needham Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Matthew M Churpek; Trevor C Yuen; Christopher Winslow; Ari A Robicsek; David O Meltzer; Robert D Gibbons; Dana P Edelson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 21.405