Literature DB >> 12535449

Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices.

D Grimes1, K Schulz, H Van Vliet, N Stanwood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insertion of an intrauterine device (IUD) immediately after delivery is appealing for several reasons. The woman is known not to be pregnant, her motivation for contraception may be high and the setting may be convenient for both the woman and her provider. However, the risk of spontaneous expulsion may be unacceptably high.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and feasibility of IUD insertion immediately after expulsion of the placenta. Our a priori hypothesis was that this practice is safe but associated with higher expulsion rates than interval IUD insertion. SEARCH STRATEGY: We used MEDLINE, Popline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register computer searches, supplemented by review articles and contact with investigators. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought all randomized controlled trials that had at least one treatment arm that involved immediate post-partum (within ten minutes of placental expulsion) insertion of an IUD. Comparisons could include different IUDs, different insertion techniques, immediate vs. delayed post-partum insertion, or immediate vs. interval insertion (unrelated to pregnancy). Studies could include either vaginal or cesarean deliveries. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We evaluated the methodological quality of each report and sought to identify duplicate reporting of data from multicenter trials. We abstracted data onto data collection forms. Principal outcome measures included pregnancy, expulsion, and continuation rates. Because the trials did not have uniform interventions, we were unable to aggregate them in a meta-analysis. MAIN
RESULTS: We found no randomized controlled trials that directly compared immediate post-partum insertion with either delayed post-partum or interval insertion. Modifications of existing devices, such as adding absorbable sutures or additional appendages, did not appear beneficial. Most studies showed no important differences between insertions done by hand or by instruments. Lippes Loops and Progestasert devices did not perform as well as did copper devices. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate post-partum insertion of IUDs appeared safe and effective, though direct comparisons with other insertion times were lacking. Advantages of immediate post-partum insertion include high motivation, assurance that the woman is not pregnant, and convenience. However, expulsion rates appear to be higher than with interval insertion. The popularity of immediate post-partum IUD insertion in countries as diverse as China, Mexico, and Egypt support the feasibility of this approach. Early follow-up may be important in identifying spontaneous IUD expulsions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12535449     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  10 in total

1.  Barriers to contraceptive use in product labeling and practice guidelines.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Charlotte Ellertson; Katrina Abuabara; Kelly Blanchard; Francisco T Rivas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Bridging the gaps among research, policy and practice in ten low- and middle-income countries: development and testing of a questionnaire for researchers.

Authors:  David Cameron; John N Lavis; G Emmanuel Guindon; Tasleem Akhtar; Francisco Becerra Posada; Godwin D Ndossi; Boungnong Boupha
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2010-01-29

3.  Bridging the gaps between research, policy and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a survey of health care providers.

Authors:  G Emmanuel Guindon; John N Lavis; Francisco Becerra-Posada; Hossein Malek-Afzali; Guang Shi; C Ashok K Yesudian; Steven J Hoffman
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Beatrice A Chen; Matthew F Reeves; Jennifer L Hayes; Heather L Hohmann; Lisa K Perriera; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Post-placental Intrauterine Device Insertion Versus Delayed Intrauterine Device Insertion: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Nadia Khurshid; Shehnaz Taing; Ambreen Qureshi; Insha Jan Khanyari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-02-08

Review 6.  Copper containing intra-uterine devices versus depot progestogens for contraception.

Authors:  G Justus Hofmeyr; Mandisa Singata; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

7.  Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertions in Caesarean and Vaginal Deliveries: A Comparative Study of Follow-Up Outcomes.

Authors:  Reetu Hooda; Sonika Mann; Smiti Nanda; Anjali Gupta; Hemant More; Jaikrit Bhutani
Journal:  Int J Reprod Med       Date:  2016-08-17

8.  Evaluating the Implementation of an Intervention to Improve Postpartum Contraception in Tanzania: A Qualitative Study of Provider and Client Perspectives.

Authors:  Kristy Hackett; Sarah Huber-Krum; Joel M Francis; Leigh Senderowicz; Erin Pearson; Hellen Siril; Nzovu Ulenga; Iqbal Shah
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2020-06-30

9.  Intrauterine device quo vadis? Why intrauterine device use should be revisited particularly in nulliparous women?

Authors:  Dirk Wildemeersch; Norman Goldstuck; Thomas Hasskamp; Sohela Jandi; Ansgar Pett
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2015-01-16

10.  A one-year cohort study of complications, continuation, and failure rates of postpartum TCu380A in Tanzania.

Authors:  France John Rwegoshora; Projestine Selestine Muganyizi; Grasiana Festus Kimario; Ponsian Patrick Paul; Anita Makins
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.223

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.