Literature DB >> 16449602

Barriers to contraceptive use in product labeling and practice guidelines.

Daniel Grossman1, Charlotte Ellertson, Katrina Abuabara, Kelly Blanchard, Francisco T Rivas.   

Abstract

Many contraceptives are encumbered with potentially unnecessary restrictions on their use. Indeed, fear of side effects, fostered by alarmist labeling, is a leading reason that women do not use contraceptives. In the United States, hormonal methods currently require a prescription, although research suggests that women can adequately screen themselves for contraindications, manage side effects, and determine an appropriate initiation date, leaving little need for routine direct physician involvement. Sizing, spermicidal use, and length-of-wear limits burden users of cervical barriers and may be unnecessary. Despite recent changes in the labeling of intrauterine devices, clinicians commonly restrict use of this method and in some countries may limit the types of providers authorized to insert them. Although in some cases additional research is necessary, existing data indicate that evidence-based demedicalization of contraceptive provision could reduce costs and improve access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16449602      PMCID: PMC1470589          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.040774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  60 in total

Review 1.  Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception: Current practice vs evidence.

Authors:  F H Stewart; C C Harper; C E Ellertson; D A Grimes; G F Sawaya; J Trussell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-05-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Home and laboratory pregnancy-testing kits.

Authors:  M Wheeler
Journal:  Prof Nurse       Date:  1999-05

3.  Off-label use of prescription drugs.

Authors:  Stuart L Nightingale
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  Discontinuation of contraceptive use in Ghana.

Authors:  Nicholas J Parr
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 5.  Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  D Grimes; K Schulz; N Stanwood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

6.  Nurse-midwife insertion of the copper T in Thailand: performance, acceptance, and programmatic effects.

Authors:  N H Wright; C Sujpluem; A G Rosenfield; S Varakamin
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  1977-09

7.  Understanding risk: a randomized controlled trial of communicating contraceptive effectiveness.

Authors:  Markus J Steiner; Sandra Dalebout; Sean Condon; Rosalie Dominik; James Trussell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Frank A Sonnenberg; Ronald T Burkman; C Greg Hagerty; Leon Speroff; Theodore Speroff
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Follow-up visits after IUD-insertion: sense or nonsense? A technology assessment study to analyze the effectiveness of follow-up visits after IUD insertion.

Authors:  Karlijn Neuteboom; Cornelis D de Kroon; Marianne Dersjant-Roorda; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 10.  Combined hormonal versus nonhormonal versus progestin-only contraception in lactation.

Authors:  S T Truitt; A B Fraser; D A Grimes; M F Gallo; K F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003
View more
  9 in total

1.  Is effective contraceptive use conceived prenatally in Florida? The association between prenatal contraceptive counseling and postpartum contraceptive use.

Authors:  Leticia E Hernandez; William M Sappenfield; David Goodman; Jennifer Pooler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

2.  Computer-assisted provision of hormonal contraception in acute care settings.

Authors:  Eleanor B Schwarz; Elizabeth J Burch; Sara M Parisi; Kathleen P Tebb; Daniel Grossman; Ateev Mehrotra; Ralph Gonzales
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Accuracy of self-screening for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive use.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Leticia Fernandez; Kristine Hopkins; Jon Amastae; Sandra G Garcia; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Mixed-methods study on pharmacies as contraception providers to Kenyan young people: who uses them and why?

Authors:  Lianne Gonsalves; Kaspar Wyss; Jenny A Cresswell; Michael Waithaka; Peter Gichangi; Adriane Martin Hilber
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Impact of a social franchise intervention program on the adoption of long and short acting family planning methods in hard to reach communities in Myanmar.

Authors:  Tin Aung; May Me Thet; May Sudhinaraset; Nadia Diamond-Smith
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  Demand- and supply-side factors associated with the use of contraceptive methods in Pakistan: a comparative study of demographic and health surveys, 1990-2018.

Authors:  Sadia Jabeen; Adnan Rathor; Maria Riaz; Rubeena Zakar; Florian Fischer
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Use of simulated patients to evaluate combined oral contraceptive dispensing practices of community pharmacists.

Authors:  Paulo Roque Obreli-Neto; Leonardo Régis Leira Pereira; Camilo Molino Guidoni; André de Oliveira Baldoni; Srecko Marusic; Divaldo Pereira de Lyra-Júnior; Kelsen Luis de Almeida; Ana Claudia Montolezi Pazete; Janaina Dutra do Nascimento; Mitja Kos; Edmarlon Girotto; Roberto Kenji Nakamura Cuman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Determinants of contraceptives use amongst youth: an exploratory study with family planning service providers in Karachi Pakistan.

Authors:  Noureen Aleem Nishtar; Neelofar Sami; Sabina Alim; Nousheen Pradhan; Farid Ul Hasnain
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2013-01-05

9.  "Doctors are in the best position to know…": The perceived medicalization of contraceptive method choice in Ibadan and Kaduna, Nigeria.

Authors:  Hilary M Schwandt; Joanna Skinner; Abdulmumin Saad; Lisa Cobb
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-03-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.