Literature DB >> 12531751

A prospective randomized study of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Kim A Jansson1, Eric Linko, Jerker Sandelin, Arsi Harilainen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft has been the most commonly used graft material in anterior cruciate reconstructions, but there has been increasing use of hamstring tendon grafts. However, no existing clinical studies show adequate support for the choice of one graft over the other. HYPOTHESIS: Hamstring tendons are equally as good as patellar tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with laxity caused by a torn anterior cruciate ligament underwent arthroscopically assisted reconstruction with graft randomization according to their birth year. Grafts were either bone-patellar tendon-bone with metal interference screw fixation or double-looped hamstring tendons with metal plate fixation. There were no significant differences between the two groups preoperatively or at operation. Standard rehabilitation included immediate postoperative mobilization without a knee brace, protected weightbearing for 2 weeks, and return to full activity at 6 to 12 months.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients in the patellar tendon group and 46 patients in the hamstring tendon group were available for clinical evaluation at a minimum of 21 months after surgery. No statistically significant differences were seen with respect to clinical and instrumented laxity testing, International Knee Documentation Committee Score ratings, isokinetic muscle torque measurements, and Kujala patellofemoral, Lysholm, and Tegner scores.
CONCLUSION: Equal results were seen for patellar and hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions at 2 years after surgery. Both techniques seem to improve patients' performance. Copyright 2003 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12531751     DOI: 10.1177/03635465030310010501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  62 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of patellar tendon grafts or hamstring tendon grafts in endoscopic ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Anita Sole; Torbjørn Strand; Gisle Uppheim; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Jon Olav Drogset
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in females: a comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autografts.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller; Alasdair G Sutherland; Johanna Elliott
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Quantitative evaluation of anterior tibial translation during isokinetic motion in knees with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either patellar or hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  N Sato; H Higuchi; M Terauchi; M Kimura; K Takagishi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  ACL reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring grafts--economical aspects.

Authors:  Magnus Forssblad; Anders Valentin; Björn Engström; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A prospective comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male patients.

Authors:  Gauti Laxdal; Ninni Sernert; Lars Ejerhed; Jon Karlsson; Jüri T Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The effect of graft choice on functional outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Matjaz Sajovic; Andrej Strahovnik; Radko Komadina; Mojca Z Dernovsek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Randomized prospective study of ACL reconstruction with interference screw fixation in patellar tendon autografts versus femoral metal plate suspension and tibial post fixation in hamstring tendon autografts: 5-year clinical and radiological follow-up results.

Authors:  Arsi Harilainen; Eric Linko; Jerker Sandelin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Engineering orthopedic tissue interfaces.

Authors:  Peter J Yang; Johnna S Temenoff
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft versus LARS artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Zhong-tang Liu; Xian-long Zhang; Yao Jiang; Bing-Fang Zeng
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Differences in the rehabilitation period following two methods of anterior cruciate ligament replacement: semitendinosus/gracilis tendon vs. ligamentum patellae.

Authors:  Tim Rose; Thomas Engel; Joachim Bernhard; Pierre Hepp; Christoph Josten; Helmut Lill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.