Literature DB >> 17431619

The effect of graft choice on functional outcome in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Matjaz Sajovic1, Andrej Strahovnik, Radko Komadina, Mojca Z Dernovsek.   

Abstract

A prospective, randomised, 5-year follow-up study was designed to compare the functional results between patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Primary reconstruction was performed in 32 patients using the central third of the patellar ligament and in 32 patients using double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. All reconstructions were performed by a single surgeon, with identical surgical technique and rehabilitation protocol. Of the total 64 patients in the study, 54 (85%) were available for the 5-year follow-up. No statistically significant differences were seen with respect to Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) classification, clinical and KT-2000 arthrometer laxity testing, single-legged hop test and anterior knee pain. Graft rupture occurred in two patients (8%) in the patellar tendon group and in two patients (7%) in the hamstring tendon group; 23 patients (88%) in the patellar tendon group and 23 patients (82%) in the hamstring tendon group returned to their pre-injury activity level. Good subjective outcome and stability can be obtained by using either graft; no statistically significant differences were found in functional outcome between the grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17431619      PMCID: PMC2532271          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0341-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  A prospective randomized study of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kim A Jansson; Eric Linko; Jerker Sandelin; Arsi Harilainen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Julian A Feller; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Followup of the acute nonoperated isolated anterior cruciate ligament tear.

Authors:  R J Hawkins; G W Misamore; T R Merritt
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Rupture of the patellar ligament after use of its central third for anterior cruciate reconstruction. A report of two cases.

Authors:  J J Bonamo; R M Krinick; A A Sporn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part I: the long-term functional disability in athletically active individuals.

Authors:  F R Noyes; P A Mooar; D S Matthews; D L Butler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts.

Authors:  Kevin B Freedman; Michael J D'Amato; David D Nedeff; Ari Kaz; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Untreated ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. A follow-up study.

Authors:  W J McDaniel; T B Dameron
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; P Nitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons.

Authors:  R A Marder; J R Raskind; M Carroll
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olufemi R Ayeni; Manraj Chahal; Michael N Tran; Sheila Sprague
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Does graft choice affect osteoarthritis development in the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Oguz Cebesoy; Mehmet Subasi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Fraudulent submissions.

Authors:  Marko Pecina; Anthony Hall
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  The effect of patient and injury factors on long-term outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Curr Orthop Pract       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 6.  Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Emilio Romanini; Franca D'Angelo; Salvatore De Masi; Ezio Adriani; Massimiliano Magaletti; Eleonora Lacorte; Paola Laricchiuta; Luciano Sagliocca; Cristina Morciano; Alfonso Mele
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-12-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.