Literature DB >> 12528901

A cognitive complexity metric applied to cognitive development.

Glenda Andrews1, Graeme S Halford.   

Abstract

Two experiments tested predictions from a theory in which processing load depends on relational complexity (RC), the number of variables related in a single decision. Tasks from six domains (transitivity, hierarchical classification, class inclusion, cardinality, relative-clause sentence comprehension, and hypothesis testing) were administered to children aged 3-8 years. Complexity analyses indicated that the domains entailed ternary relations (three variables). Simpler binary-relation (two variables) items were included for each domain. Thus RC was manipulated with other factors tightly controlled. Results indicated that (i) ternary-relation items were more difficult than comparable binary-relation items, (ii) the RC manipulation was sensitive to age-related changes, (iii) ternary relations were processed at a median age of 5 years, (iv) cross-task correlations were positive, with all tasks loading on a single factor (RC), (v) RC factor scores accounted for 80% (88%) of age-related variance in fluid intelligence (compositionality of sets), (vi) binary- and ternary-relation items formed separate complexity classes, and (vii) the RC approach to defining cognitive complexity is applicable to different content domains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12528901     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00002-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  21 in total

1.  Belief-based and analytic processing in transitive inference depends on premise integration difficulty.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Emily M Elliott; J Scott Saults; Candice C Morey; Sam Mattox; Anna Hismjatullina; Andrew R A Conway
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews; Damian Birney; Graeme S Halford
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

4.  Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: a new hypothesis.

Authors:  Graeme S Halford; Nelson Cowan; Glenda Andrews
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Age differences in visual working memory capacity: not based on encoding limitations.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Angela M AuBuchon; Amanda L Gilchrist; Timothy J Ricker; J Scott Saults
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-06-18

6.  The benefits and costs of comparisons in a novel object categorization task: interactions with development.

Authors:  Luc Augier; Jean-Pierre Thibaut
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

7.  Working Memory Underpins Cognitive Development, Learning, and Education.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-06-01

8.  Developmental grey matter changes in superior parietal cortex accompany improved transitive reasoning.

Authors:  Cristián Modroño; Gorka Navarrete; Antoinette Nicolle; José Luis González-Mora; Kathleen W Smith; Miriam Marling; Vinod Goel
Journal:  Think Reason       Date:  2018-10-03

9.  The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  What do transitive inference and class inclusion have in common? Categorical (co)products and cognitive development.

Authors:  Steven Phillips; William H Wilson; Graeme S Halford
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.